Information about shooting in Ravenna area

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25: the post names its responding authorities, "Seattle police are investigating" and "UWPD officers responded to the area", and explains the UW alerting decision.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" are both named as responding authorities.
  2. present: Seattle police and UWPD officers are named as responding and investigating.
  3. present: "UWPD officers" and "Seattle police" are both named as responders and sources.
  4. present: UWPD and Seattle police are both named as the agencies responding and investigating.
  5. present: "UWPD officers" and "Seattle police" are identified as the responding agencies.
  6. present: "Seattle police are investigating" and "UWPD officers responded" name the agencies involved.
  7. present: "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" are both identified as the responding agencies.
  8. present: Seattle police and UWPD officers are both named as responding and investigating.
  9. present: Cites "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" as the responding agencies.
  10. present: "UWPD officers" and "Seattle police" are both named as responding and investigating.
  11. present: "Seattle police are investigating" and "UWPD officers responded" name the agencies involved.
  12. present: Both "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" are named as the responding authorities.
  13. present: Both "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" are identified as investigating and responding.
  14. present: "UWPD officers" and "Seattle police" are identified as the investigating agencies behind the post.
  15. present: "UWPD officers" and "Seattle police" are named as the investigating authorities.
  16. present: "Seattle police are investigating" and "UWPD officers responded" identify the responding agencies.
  17. present: UWPD and Seattle police are named, and the UW speaks about its own alerting decision.
  18. present: "Seattle police", "UWPD officers" and the university voice identify the source.
  19. present: Seattle police and UWPD officers are named as investigating and responding.
  20. present: "UWPD officers responded" and "Seattle police are investigating" name both agencies behind the post.
  21. present: Seattle police and UWPD officers are named as investigating and responding.
  22. present: "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" are identified as the responding agencies.
  23. present: "Seattle police are investigating" and "UWPD officers responded" name both responding agencies.
  24. present: "UWPD officers responded" alongside Seattle police identifies the reporting authorities.
  25. present: "Seattle police" and "UWPD officers" are identified as the responding agencies.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25: the threat is a shooting, a student "was shot in the leg this morning" during an altercation, with officers "searching for the man who fired the gun".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The hazard is a shooting in which a student "was shot in the leg".
  2. present: A student being shot is the specific threat described.
  3. present: A shooting is named: a student "was shot in the leg" by a man who "fired the gun".
  4. present: A shooting is named specifically: a student "was shot in the leg".
  5. present: A shooting is named: a student "was shot in the leg" by a man who "fired the gun".
  6. present: The hazard is a shooting in which "A University of Washington student was shot in the leg".
  7. present: A student "was shot in the leg", naming gunfire as the specific threat.
  8. present: A shooting is named: a student "was shot in the leg" and a man fired the gun.
  9. present: Reports a student "was shot in the leg", naming gunfire as the threat.
  10. present: The message reports a student "was shot in the leg", naming gunfire as the threat.
  11. present: It reports a student "was shot in the leg", a specific gun violence event.
  12. present: A shooting is named specifically, with a student "shot in the leg" by an identified gunman.
  13. present: The threat named is a shooting in which a student "was shot in the leg".
  14. present: A shooting is named, with a student shot and officers searching for "the man who fired the gun".
  15. present: A shooting is named: a student "was shot in the leg" by a man who fired a gun.
  16. present: The incident is named as a shooting in which a student "was shot in the leg".
  17. present: A shooting is named: a student "was shot in the leg" by a man who fired a gun.
  18. present: A student "was shot in the leg", naming gunfire as the threat.
  19. present: A shooting is described, with a student "shot in the leg" by a man who fired a gun.
  20. present: The threat is a shooting: a student "was shot in the leg" by a man who fired a gun.
  21. present: A shooting in which a student was shot in the leg is the specific threat named.
  22. present: A shooting is named: the student "was shot in the leg".
  23. present: The threat is a shooting in which "A University of Washington student was shot in the leg".
  24. present: It states a student "was shot in the leg" by a man who fired a gun, a specific violent threat.
  25. present: It reports a student "was shot in the leg", naming gunfire as the specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25: the shooting is placed "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE", described as beyond the immediate area on or near the Seattle campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It happened "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" while the student walked.
  2. present: Near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE locates the shooting.
  3. present: It happened "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  4. present: It gives "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  5. present: It places the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  6. present: The shooting is placed "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  7. present: The shooting is placed "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  8. present: It gives the location "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  9. present: Specifies walking "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  10. present: It gives "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  11. present: The shooting is placed "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  12. present: The site is "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  13. present: It places the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  14. present: It places the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  15. present: The site is "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  16. present: It places the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  17. present: It locates the incident "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  18. present: It occurred "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  19. present: The location is "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  20. present: It locates the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE" in the Ravenna area.
  21. present: It gives NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE as where the student was walking.
  22. present: It locates the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  23. present: It locates the shooting "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  24. present: The shooting is placed "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
  25. present: The shooting is placed "near NE 52nd Street and 22nd Avenue NE".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25: the notice gives readers a clear action, "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is an action for readers.
  2. present: Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000.
  3. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is an instruction to readers.
  4. present: It asks, "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000".
  5. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is a direct instruction.
  6. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is an instruction to readers.
  7. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs recipient action.
  8. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is an instruction to readers.
  9. present: Asks "Anyone with information" to "contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000".
  10. present: It asks that "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000".
  11. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" instructs recipients.
  12. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs reader action.
  13. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is a direct instruction.
  14. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is an instruction to readers.
  15. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is an instruction to readers.
  16. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" is a direct request to readers.
  17. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs the reader.
  18. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs readers.
  19. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs recipients.
  20. present: It directs that "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000."
  21. present: Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000.
  22. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000."
  23. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs recipients to act.
  24. present: "Anyone with information is asked to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000" directs reader action.
  25. present: Readers with knowledge are asked "to contact Seattle Police at 206-233-5000".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25: the shooting is timed as "this morning just before 11 a.m.", anchoring when it occurred.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It says the shooting was "this morning just before 11 a.m.".
  2. present: It says this morning just before 11 a.m.
  3. present: It says "this morning just before 11 a.m.".
  4. present: The time is stated as "this morning just before 11 a.m.".
  5. present: It happened "this morning just before 11 a.m." according to the text.
  6. present: It happened "this morning just before 11 a.m.", a clear time reference.
  7. present: "this morning just before 11 a.m." fixes the time of the shooting.
  8. present: The shooting is timed "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  9. present: Says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  10. present: The shooting is placed "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  11. present: The time is given as "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  12. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  13. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m.".
  14. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  15. present: "This morning just before 11 a.m." pins the shooting in time.
  16. present: The shooting is timed "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  17. present: Timing is given as "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  18. present: "This morning just before 11 a.m." fixes the shooting time.
  19. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  20. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  21. present: It says the shooting happened this morning just before 11 a.m.
  22. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  23. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
  24. present: "this morning just before 11 a.m." gives the incident time.
  25. present: It says the shooting happened "this morning just before 11 a.m."
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present at 25 of 25: the outcome is stated, the student "was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition".

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Consequences are explicit: hospitalization with "non-life-threatening injuries" and satisfactory condition.
  2. present: It reports the student was shot in the leg with non life threatening injuries.
  3. present: It states the victim had "non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition", conveying harm severity.
  4. present: It reports the student was hospitalized with "non-life-threatening injuries" and is in satisfactory condition.
  5. present: Severity is explicit: "non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition".
  6. present: It reports actual harm, a leg wound with "non-life-threatening injuries" and hospital treatment.
  7. present: It reports the victim taken to hospital with "non-life-threatening injuries" and "satisfactory condition", conveying severity.
  8. present: Consequences are stated: the student went to hospital "with non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition".
  9. present: Describes "non-life-threatening injuries" and hospitalization, an explicit statement of harm and severity.
  10. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "non-life-threatening injuries" and is in satisfactory condition.
  11. present: It reports "non-life-threatening injuries" and satisfactory condition, conveying the severity of harm.
  12. present: It states the harm: the student went "to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries" and is "in satisfactory condition".
  13. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized "with non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition".
  14. present: It reports the student was "shot in the leg" with "non-life-threatening injuries" and is in satisfactory condition.
  15. present: It reports "non-life-threatening injuries" and satisfactory condition, conveying the severity of the harm.
  16. present: It reports the victim was "taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition".
  17. present: The outcome is described: hospitalization with "non-life-threatening injuries" and satisfactory condition.
  18. present: It reports "non-life-threatening injuries" and satisfactory condition, conveying harm and its degree.
  19. present: Harm is stated: the student went to hospital with "non-life-threatening injuries".
  20. present: It states the student suffered "non-life-threatening injuries" and is in satisfactory condition, conveying harm and degree.
  21. present: It reports non-life-threatening injuries and satisfactory condition, conveying severity.
  22. present: It reports "non-life-threatening injuries" and satisfactory condition, conveying the degree of harm.
  23. present: Severity is stated outright: the student went to hospital "with non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition".
  24. present: Harm is stated: the student was hospitalized with "non-life-threatening injuries" and is in satisfactory condition.
  25. present: It states the student suffered "non-life-threatening injuries and is in satisfactory condition", a stated harm level.