other campus emergency notice — seattle 1

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, unanimous at 0 of 25. No agency, department or branded alert tag appears anywhere; the text is a bare notice of "Stevens Way closures" with a shortened link.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sender is identified: no agency, no university name, and no branded alert tag appears.
  2. absent: No sender, agency or branded alert tag appears; only a bare closure notice and a link.
  3. absent: The message names no sender, agency or alert brand, only a link and a send time.
  4. absent: No sender, agency or alert brand appears anywhere in this short closure notice.
  5. absent: No sender, agency or alert brand appears anywhere in this two line notice.
  6. absent: No sender, agency or branded alert signature appears in this brief traffic notice.
  7. absent: Nothing in the text names a university, alert brand or agency as sender.
  8. absent: The two lines carry no sender name, agency, or branded alert tag at all.
  9. absent: No sender, brand or agency appears anywhere in this two line traffic notice.
  10. absent: No agency, university name or alert signature appears in this brief traffic note.
  11. absent: No sender, agency or branded alert tag appears anywhere in this two-line notice.
  12. absent: No sender, agency or alert branding appears anywhere in the two short lines.
  13. absent: Nothing identifies the sender: no agency, university name or branded alert tag appears.
  14. absent: No sender, agency or branded signature appears anywhere in this short notice.
  15. absent: No sender, agency, or branded alert tag appears; the notice is unsigned apart from a shortened link.
  16. absent: No sender, agency or branded signature appears anywhere in this short closure notice.
  17. absent: No issuing office, agency or alert brand appears anywhere in the two line notice.
  18. absent: No university tag, alert brand or agency is named anywhere in this short notice.
  19. absent: Nothing identifies a sender: no university tag, alert brand or agency name appears in the two lines.
  20. absent: No sender, agency or alert brand identifies itself anywhere in the two short lines.
  21. absent: No agency, university, or branded alert signature identifies who sent this closure notice.
  22. absent: No agency, university name, or alert brand identifies who sent this closure notice.
  23. absent: No sender, agency or branded alert tag appears; the notice is unattributed.
  24. absent: No sender, university name, agency or branded alert tag appears anywhere in the two lines.
  25. absent: No department, university name or branded alert tag appears anywhere in the two short lines.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, unanimous at 0 of 25. Planned "closures" and "Bus reroutes" are scheduled construction logistics, not a threat or hazardous condition.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Planned street closures and bus reroutes are named, but no threat or hazard is stated.
  2. absent: It describes planned road closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat or hazard of any kind.
  3. absent: It describes scheduled road closures and bus reroutes, not any specific threat.
  4. absent: Road closures and bus reroutes are a planned disruption, not a named threat.
  5. absent: It describes street closures and bus reroutes, a planned disruption, not a specific threat.
  6. absent: It reports road closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat or hazard.
  7. absent: It announces road closures and bus reroutes, which are logistics, not a named threat.
  8. absent: Only planned road closures and bus reroutes are announced; no threat or hazard is named.
  9. absent: Planned street closures and bus reroutes are scheduling news, not a named threat.
  10. absent: It describes scheduled street closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat.
  11. absent: It describes planned street closures and bus reroutes, not any threat or hazard.
  12. absent: It reports scheduled road closures and bus reroutes, which is a disruption, not a named threat.
  13. absent: It announces planned road closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat or hazard.
  14. absent: It announces road closures and bus reroutes, which name no threat to anyone.
  15. absent: It announces road closures and bus reroutes, a planned construction disruption, not a named threat.
  16. absent: It announces street closures and bus reroutes but names no threat or hazard.
  17. absent: It reports scheduled street closures and bus reroutes, not any specific threat or hazard.
  18. absent: It announces road closures and bus reroutes, which are logistics rather than a named threat.
  19. absent: It announces road closures and bus reroutes, which is planned disruption, not any named threat.
  20. absent: It reports scheduled road closures and bus reroutes, which name no threat or hazard.
  21. absent: It describes planned street closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat or hazard at all.
  22. absent: It reports scheduled road closures and bus reroutes, which name no threat or hazard.
  23. absent: It reports scheduled street closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat at all.
  24. absent: It reports scheduled street closures and bus reroutes, naming no threat of any kind.
  25. absent: Planned street closures and bus reroutes are logistics, not a named threat to anyone.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The affected roadway is named outright, "Stevens Way closures start Monday, July 29".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the location of the closures.
  2. present: The location is "Stevens Way", with bus reroutes in that area.
  3. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the closure location.
  4. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the location of the closures.
  5. present: The place is named, "Stevens Way", with bus reroutes tied to it.
  6. present: The affected place is named: "Stevens Way".
  7. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the closure location.
  8. present: The location is given as "Stevens Way".
  9. present: "Stevens Way" is a specific campus roadway.
  10. present: "Stevens Way" is the named location.
  11. present: The affected roadway is named: "Stevens Way closures".
  12. present: It names Stevens Way as the location of the closures.
  13. present: The place is named, "Stevens Way", where closures start.
  14. present: It names the affected roadway, "Stevens Way".
  15. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the location of the closures.
  16. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the closed roadway.
  17. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the location of the closures.
  18. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the location of the closures.
  19. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the location of the closures.
  20. present: The place is named as "Stevens Way", with bus reroutes implied campus wide.
  21. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the affected roadway.
  22. present: The location is "Stevens Way," a specific campus roadway.
  23. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the place affected.
  24. present: "Stevens Way" is named as the closure location.
  25. present: It names "Stevens Way" as the closure location.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, unanimous at 0 of 25. Recipients are told to take no action; the message offers only "More info: http://bit.ly/2Zgo2ua".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It offers a link for more information but no instruction to take any action.
  2. absent: It offers no protective instruction, only a link for "More info".
  3. absent: No protective action is requested; readers are only pointed to a web link.
  4. absent: Readers are given no protective action, only a link for more information.
  5. absent: Nothing is asked of recipients beyond following a link for more information.
  6. absent: No protective action is given; only a link for more information.
  7. absent: Readers are only pointed to a link; no protective action is requested.
  8. absent: No protective action is requested; the text only offers a link for more information.
  9. absent: No protective action is requested, only a link to more information.
  10. absent: No protective action is requested; only a link for more information is offered.
  11. absent: No protective action is requested; only a link to more information is offered.
  12. absent: It offers a link for more information but asks readers to take no protective action.
  13. absent: No protective action is requested, only a link for more information.
  14. absent: It offers a link but never tells recipients any action such as detour or avoidance.
  15. absent: No protective action is requested; readers are only pointed to a link for more information.
  16. absent: It offers a link for more information but asks recipients to take no action.
  17. absent: No action is requested of recipients beyond following a link for more information.
  18. absent: No protective action is asked of the reader, only a link for more information.
  19. absent: No protective action is requested; the message only offers a link for more information.
  20. absent: Readers are pointed to a link for more info but given no protective action to take.
  21. absent: No protective or practical action is requested; the text only links to further information.
  22. absent: No protective or travel instruction is given, only a link with more information.
  23. absent: No protective action is requested; only a link to more information is offered.
  24. absent: No action is asked of readers beyond following a link for more information.
  25. absent: It offers a link for more information but instructs recipients to take no action.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Both endpoints are dated, closures that "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30", with the send stamp "11:01:40 AM Fri".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  2. present: Dates are given, closures "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  3. present: It gives "Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30."
  4. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes run "until Aug. 30."
  5. present: Dates are explicit, "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  6. present: It specifies closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  7. present: Dates are explicit: "Monday, July 29" through "Aug. 30".
  8. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  9. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  10. present: Dates are given: closures "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  11. present: It gives dates, "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  12. present: Dates are explicit: closures start Monday, July 29, with reroutes until Aug. 30.
  13. present: Dates are exact, "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  14. present: It gives dates, closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  15. present: It gives dates, closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30."
  16. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  17. present: It gives "Monday, July 29", "until Aug. 30" and a send time of "11:01:40 AM Fri".
  18. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  19. present: It gives dates, closures starting "Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  20. present: Dates are explicit, closures "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  21. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with "Bus reroutes until Aug. 30".
  22. present: Dates are given, closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30."
  23. present: It gives dates, "start Monday, July 29" and reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  24. present: Dates are explicit: closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
  25. present: It gives dates, closures "start Monday, July 29" with reroutes "until Aug. 30".
• Impactabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Absent by a strong majority, 2 of 25 saw impact. No danger, injury or damage is described; the pair who voted present treated a month of "Bus reroutes" as a stated consequence, which is inconvenience, not severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing is said about danger, injury or damage resulting from the closures.
  2. absent: Nothing about consequences or severity appears beyond routine travel disruption.
  3. absent: Nothing conveys harm or severity, only a schedule change.
  4. absent: No harm, danger or severity is conveyed about the closures.
  5. absent: No harm, danger or severity of any kind is described.
  6. absent: Nothing describes harm, danger or severity from the closures.
  7. absent: No consequence or danger from the closures is stated.
  8. absent: No consequence beyond scheduling is described, and no severity or danger is conveyed.
  9. present: It conveys the practical consequence, bus reroutes lasting a month.
  10. absent: No consequence beyond routine rerouting is described, and no severity is stated.
  11. absent: Nothing is said about danger, damage or severity from the closures.
  12. absent: No consequence or severity beyond the closures themselves is mentioned.
  13. absent: No harm, danger or severity is stated anywhere in the notice.
  14. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, only scheduling of closures.
  15. absent: Nothing describes harm, danger, or severity resulting from the closures.
  16. present: It states the practical consequence, bus reroutes lasting a month.
  17. absent: No consequence, danger or severity is described, only a construction schedule.
  18. absent: With no hazard, nothing is said about harm or seriousness, only schedule changes.
  19. absent: No harm, danger or severity of any kind is described.
  20. absent: No harm, danger or severity is suggested, only travel scheduling.
  21. absent: No consequence or severity of any kind is conveyed, only a schedule.
  22. absent: Nothing describes harm or severity, only routine construction disruption.
  23. absent: It conveys no harm, danger or severity of any kind.
  24. absent: No harm, danger or severity is conveyed, only a planned construction schedule.
  25. absent: No consequence beyond the reroute is described, and no severity or danger is stated.