weather campus emergency notice

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. Seattle police are named throughout and one update is a signed post, "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD) August 15, 2019".

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Seattle police" and the "@SeattlePD" account are named as the source of the information.
  2. present: The source is Seattle police, including a signed post from "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)".
  3. present: Seattle police and their homicide detectives are named as the responding authority.
  4. present: "Seattle police" and its homicide detectives are named, with the SPD account quoted.
  5. present: Seattle police and its homicide detectives are named, with the "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" post quoted.
  6. present: Seattle police and the quoted "Seattle Police Dept." are named as the investigating authority.
  7. present: Seattle police and homicide detectives, plus the @SeattlePD account, are identified.
  8. present: "Seattle police" and the quoted "Seattle Police Dept." account are named as the reporting authority.
  9. present: "Seattle police homicide detectives" and the "@SeattlePD" account identify the authority.
  10. present: "Seattle police" and the "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" account are identified.
  11. present: Seattle police and its homicide detectives are named, with a quoted Seattle Police Dept. post.
  12. present: Seattle police and its homicide detectives are named, with the @SeattlePD post quoted.
  13. present: "Seattle police homicide detectives" and the "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" account are named.
  14. present: The investigating agency is named, "Seattle police homicide detectives", with the SPD account quoted.
  15. present: "Seattle police homicide detectives" and the "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" account identify the issuing authority.
  16. present: The Seattle Police Department, including homicide detectives, is named as the source.
  17. present: "Seattle police homicide detectives" and the @SeattlePD post identify the source.
  18. present: "Seattle police" and the "@SeattlePD" handle identify the source.
  19. present: "Seattle police homicide detectives" and the quoted "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" identify the source.
  20. present: Seattle police and its homicide detectives are named, with a quoted Seattle Police Dept. post.
  21. present: Seattle police homicide detectives are named, along with the quoted "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" account.
  22. present: Attribution runs through "Seattle police homicide detectives" and "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)."
  23. present: Seattle police and their homicide detectives are named, with a quoted "Seattle Police Dept. (@SeattlePD)" post.
  24. present: The Seattle Police Department is named and quoted, including its homicide detectives.
  25. present: "Seattle police" and their homicide detectives, plus the @SeattlePD account, identify the authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The threat is explicit, "a fatal stabbing" that became a "homicide investigation" with "Police actively searching for the suspects".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A "fatal stabbing" and homicide investigation with suspects still sought is named.
  2. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" and an ensuing "homicide investigation", specific violent threats.
  3. present: The hazard is a fatal stabbing, described as "a homicide investigation."
  4. present: It names a fatal stabbing and a homicide investigation, a specific violent threat.
  5. present: The hazard is explicit, a "fatal stabbing" now a homicide investigation with suspects at large.
  6. present: The hazard is a stabbing that became a homicide investigation with suspects at large.
  7. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" and a homicide investigation with suspects at large.
  8. present: The hazard is a "fatal stabbing" now handled as a "homicide investigation".
  9. present: It names a stabbing that became a homicide investigation with suspects at large.
  10. present: The hazard is a stabbing that became "a fatal stabbing" and homicide investigation.
  11. present: It names a fatal stabbing that became a homicide investigation with suspects still sought.
  12. present: The hazard is explicit: a fatal stabbing that became a homicide investigation.
  13. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" that became "a homicide investigation".
  14. present: It names a "fatal stabbing" and homicide investigation, a specific violent threat.
  15. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" that became "a homicide investigation," a specific violent hazard.
  16. present: It reports a stabbing that became a homicide investigation with suspects at large.
  17. present: It names a "fatal stabbing" and a homicide investigation, a specific violent threat.
  18. present: The hazard is a fatal stabbing, now "a homicide investigation".
  19. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" and an active homicide investigation.
  20. present: The hazard is explicit, a fatal stabbing with suspects still being sought.
  21. present: The threat is explicit: "a fatal stabbing" that became a homicide investigation.
  22. present: The hazard is a "fatal stabbing" with suspects still sought, an explicit violent threat.
  23. present: It names a stabbing that became "a homicide investigation", a specific violent threat.
  24. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" and an ongoing homicide investigation.
  25. present: It names "a fatal stabbing" and an ongoing homicide investigation with suspects at large.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The scene is fixed at "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", and again at "the 1400 block of NE 43 Street".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The site is "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  2. present: The scene is "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", in the 1400 block of NE 43 Street.
  3. present: The location is the alley near "NE 43rd St. and University Way NE."
  4. present: It locates the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE" and the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  5. present: It locates the incident in "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  6. present: It names the alley near "NE 43rd St. and University Way NE" and the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  7. present: The site is the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE.
  8. present: The place is the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", in the 1400 block of NE 43 Street.
  9. present: The alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE" and the 1400 block of NE 43 Street are specified.
  10. present: It names the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE" and the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  11. present: The scene is "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", in the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  12. present: It places the attack in the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE.
  13. present: The place is the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  14. present: It gives the scene, the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  15. present: The scene is "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE," in the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  16. present: It names the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE and the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  17. present: It places the stabbing in the alley near "NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  18. present: It names the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  19. present: It locates it in "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", the 1400 block of NE 43 Street.
  20. present: It locates the scene at "NE 43rd St. and University Way NE" and the 1400 block of NE 43 Street.
  21. present: The place is given as "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", in the 1400 block of NE 43 Street.
  22. present: It specifies "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE" and "the 1400 block of NE 43 Street."
  23. present: It places the attack in an alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE".
  24. present: The scene is "the alley near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", in the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
  25. present: The scene is the alley "near NE 43rd St. and University Way NE", the 1400 block of NE 43rd.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, unanimous at 0 of 25. The alert states that "The area is cordoned off and will remained closed" but never tells recipients to avoid it, shelter or do anything.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It reports the area is cordoned off but never instructs recipients to avoid, shelter or act.
  2. absent: No protective action is asked of readers; the text only reports cordons and detective work.
  3. absent: It reports the area is cordoned off but never instructs readers to avoid or do anything.
  4. absent: No instruction is directed at readers; the text only describes the cordon and the investigation.
  5. absent: Nothing tells recipients what to do; the text only reports the area is cordoned off by police.
  6. absent: It describes cordons and police work but never tells recipients to take any action.
  7. absent: It reports cordons and police activity but never tells readers to take any action.
  8. absent: No protective instruction is given to readers; the text only notes the area is cordoned off by police.
  9. absent: It reports the area is cordoned off but never tells recipients to avoid it or take any action.
  10. absent: No protective instruction is given to recipients; it only reports the area is cordoned off by police.
  11. absent: No action is asked of recipients; the text only reports that police cordoned off the area.
  12. absent: It reports the area is cordoned off by police but asks recipients to do nothing themselves.
  13. absent: It reports the cordon and police search but never tells recipients what to do.
  14. absent: It reports cordons and searches by police but never tells recipients to avoid or do anything.
  15. absent: No action is requested of readers; the text only reports cordons and the ongoing police search.
  16. absent: It only describes police activity and cordons: recipients are given no protective instruction.
  17. absent: No protective instruction is given; the text only reports cordons and detective work.
  18. absent: It reports cordons and police searching but never tells recipients what to do.
  19. absent: No action is asked of readers; the text only says the area is cordoned off and police are searching.
  20. absent: It describes police activity and the cordon but never tells readers what to do.
  21. absent: The text only describes cordons and investigative work; recipients are never told to avoid or do anything.
  22. absent: The text only reports that the area is cordoned off; it never instructs readers to avoid or shelter.
  23. absent: It describes cordons and detective work but never instructs recipients to do anything.
  24. absent: Nothing is asked of recipients; the text only describes cordons and detective work by responders.
  25. absent: Readers are told the area is cordoned off but are never instructed to avoid it or take any action.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The stamps run from "Sent at 7:45:48 PM Wed" and a stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m." through updates at 7:51 p.m., 8 p.m. and 10:26 p.m.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Updates are stamped "10:26 p.m.", "8 p.m." and "7:51 p.m." with the stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m."
  2. present: Times run through "7:45:48 PM Wed", "shortly after 7 p.m.", 7:51, 8 and 10:26 p.m.
  3. present: Times "7:51 p.m.," "8 p.m." and "10:26 p.m." are given.
  4. present: It is stamped "UPDATE at 10:26 p.m." and says the stabbing occurred "shortly after 7 p.m."
  5. present: Times are given, "shortly after 7 p.m." and updates at 7:51, 8 and 10:26 p.m.
  6. present: Timing is precise, from "shortly after 7 p.m." to the 10:26 p.m. update.
  7. present: Times include "shortly after 7 p.m." and updates at 7:51 p.m., 8 p.m. and 10:26 p.m.
  8. present: Several stamps appear, including "7:51 p.m." and the stabbing occurring "shortly after 7 p.m.".
  9. present: Times are given, "10:26 p.m.", "8 p.m." and "shortly after 7 p.m."
  10. present: Times "7:45 p.m.", "7:51 p.m." and "10:26 p.m." are given.
  11. present: Stamps include "7:45:48 PM Wed", "7:51 p.m." and "10:26 p.m.".
  12. present: Times run from shortly after 7 p.m. through the 10:26 p.m. update.
  13. present: Times run from "shortly after 7 p.m." to "UPDATE at 10:26 p.m.".
  14. present: It carries stamps at "7:45:48 PM Wed", "7:51 p.m." and "10:26 p.m.".
  15. present: It gives several clock times, including "UPDATE at 10:26 p.m." and a stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m."
  16. present: Times are given, "UPDATE at 10:26 p.m." and a stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m.".
  17. present: It gives "10:26 p.m.", "8 p.m." and the stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m."
  18. present: Timing is given as "shortly after 7 p.m." with stamps through 10:26 p.m.
  19. present: It stamps updates at "10:26 p.m." and "7:51 p.m." and dates the stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m.".
  20. present: Multiple stamps appear, from "7:45:48 PM Wed" through the "10:26 p.m." update.
  21. present: It carries "UPDATE at 10:26 p.m.", "8 p.m.", "shortly after 7 p.m." and "Sent at 7:45:48 PM Wed".
  22. present: Stamps include "UPDATE at 10:26 p.m." and the stabbing "shortly after 7 p.m."
  23. present: It stamps updates at "7:51 p.m.", "8 p.m." and "10:26 p.m." and says the stabbing occurred "shortly after 7 p.m.".
  24. present: Times are given: "10:26 p.m.", "8 p.m." and an incident "shortly after 7 p.m."
  25. present: Times run from "shortly after 7 p.m." through the "10:26 p.m." update.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, unanimous at 25 of 25. The outcome is stated flatly, "The victim was pronounced deceased", with suspects still at large.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The harm is stated plainly: "The victim was pronounced deceased" after being stabbed.
  2. present: Severity is explicit: "The victim was pronounced deceased" while "Police actively searching for the suspects".
  3. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects are still being sought.
  4. present: It states the outcome, "The victim was pronounced deceased," and notes suspects are still being sought.
  5. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that police are searching for the suspects.
  6. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that police are "actively searching for the suspects".
  7. present: The victim "was pronounced deceased" and police are "actively searching for the suspects", conveying lethal severity.
  8. present: It states the outcome plainly: "The victim was pronounced deceased" after the stabbing.
  9. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that police are searching for suspects.
  10. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects are still being sought.
  11. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects are still being sought.
  12. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that police are actively searching for suspects.
  13. present: It states the outcome, "The victim was pronounced deceased", with suspects still sought.
  14. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects remain at large, a severe outcome.
  15. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects remain at large, conveying lethal severity.
  16. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects are still being sought.
  17. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects are still being sought.
  18. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects are still being sought.
  19. present: It states "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects remain at large, a clear severity signal.
  20. present: It states the outcome directly, "The victim was pronounced deceased" after the stabbing.
  21. present: It conveys severity clearly: "The victim was pronounced deceased" and "Police actively searching for the suspects".
  22. present: Severity is explicit: "The victim was pronounced deceased" and "Police actively searching for the suspects."
  23. present: It reports "The victim was pronounced deceased" and that suspects remain at large, conveying lethal severity.
  24. present: "The victim was pronounced deceased" and police "actively searching for the suspects" convey grave severity.
  25. present: "The victim was pronounced deceased" states the gravest possible consequence.