Advisory issued after reports of three residence-hall assaults by one student

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: University Police and the Community Safety Advisory identify the university as sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "University Police" and the "Wake Safe App", identifying the university police as sender.
  2. present: It identifies "University Police" and the "Community Safety Advisory" institutional sender.
  3. present: It names "University Police" and the "Wake Safe App" as the institutional sender.
  4. present: It names "University Police" and is a "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the sender.
  5. present: It identifies "University Police" and is labeled a "Community Safety Advisory" under the "Clery Campus Safety Act", naming the sender.
  6. present: It names "University Police" and is labeled a "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the sender.
  7. present: Identifies "University Police" and the "Wake Safe App", naming the issuing authority.
  8. present: It names "University Police" and is titled a "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the issuing authority.
  9. present: Names "University Police" and the "Community Safety Advisory" branding, identifying the sender.
  10. present: It names "University Police" and is headed "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the sender.
  11. present: Identifies "University Police" as the issuing authority sending this Community Safety Advisory.
  12. present: Names "University Police" as the issuer and references the "Wake Safe App" and "police@wfu.edu".
  13. present: It names "University Police" and "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the issuing authority.
  14. present: Identifies the sender as "University Police" issuing a "Community Safety Advisory".
  15. present: Identifies "University Police" and the "Community Safety Advisory" sender, naming the authority.
  16. present: Identifies "University Police" and signs as a "Community Safety Advisory", naming the sender.
  17. present: Identifies "University Police" as the sender of the Community Safety Advisory.
  18. present: It names "University Police" and the "Jeanne Clery Campus Safety Act", identifying the issuing authority.
  19. present: It names "University Police" and the signature "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the sender.
  20. present: It names "University Police" and cites the "Jeanne Clery" Act, identifying the issuing authority.
  21. present: Names "University Police" and signs "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the sender.
  22. present: It names "University Police" issuing the "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the sender.
  23. present: It names "University Police" and is a "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the source.
  24. present: Identifies "University Police" as the issuing authority.
  25. present: It names "University Police" and a "Community Safety Advisory", identifying the issuing authority.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All reads agree: the alert names a specific threat, sexual assaults by a male student.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "Sexual Assaults" by a male student, a specific threat.
  2. present: It names "Sexual Assaults", a specific crime threat.
  3. present: It identifies "Sexual Assaults", a specific threat against three individuals.
  4. present: It names "sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific hazard.
  5. present: It names "Sexual Assaults" specifically as the hazard.
  6. present: It names "Sexual Assaults" and a male student who "sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific threat.
  7. present: Names "Sexual Assaults", a specific threat described in detail.
  8. present: It names the hazard: a "male student sexually assaulted three individuals", sexual assault.
  9. present: Names "Sexual Assaults" and a male student who "sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific threat.
  10. present: It names "Sexual Assaults" allegedly committed by a male student, a specific hazard.
  11. present: Names "Sexual Assaults" by a "male student", a specific hazard.
  12. present: It names "Sexual Assaults", a specific crime.
  13. present: It names the threat specifically as "Sexual Assaults" by a male student.
  14. present: Names the hazard specifically as alleged "Sexual Assaults" of three individuals.
  15. present: Names "Sexual Assaults", a specific hazard, with a male student alleged perpetrator.
  16. present: Names "Sexual Assaults" and a "sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific threat.
  17. present: Names "sexually assaulted" / "Sexual Assaults", a specific hazard.
  18. present: It states a male student "sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific hazard.
  19. present: It names "Sexual Assaults", a specific threat.
  20. present: It names "Sexual Assaults" by "a male student", a specific hazard.
  21. present: Names "sexual assaults", a specific hazard.
  22. present: It names "Sexual Assaults" and a male student who "sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific hazard.
  23. present: It names "sexually assaulted" and "Sexual Assaults", a specific hazard.
  24. present: Names "sexually assaulted" and "Sexual Assaults", a specific threat.
  25. present: It reports a "male student sexually assaulted three individuals", a specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: specific locations are given, residence halls on campus.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names "residence halls" and "on Campus", specific locations.
  2. present: It names "residence halls" on campus, a specific location.
  3. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", specific campus locations.
  4. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a place on campus.
  5. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls" and "on Campus".
  6. present: It names "residence halls" and "on Campus", specific places.
  7. present: Says the assaults occurred "in residence halls" on "Campus", specific places.
  8. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls" on campus, a location reference.
  9. present: Names "residence halls", a specific place on campus.
  10. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls" and "on Campus", a location.
  11. present: Says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific campus location.
  12. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific location.
  13. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a location.
  14. present: States the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a place on campus.
  15. present: Says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific location type.
  16. present: States the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a campus location.
  17. present: Says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a place on campus.
  18. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific location type on campus.
  19. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific location.
  20. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls" on campus, a specific place.
  21. present: Says assaults occurred "in residence halls" and "on Campus", specific places.
  22. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific campus location.
  23. present: It says "in residence halls", a specific place.
  24. present: Names "residence halls", a specific location.
  25. present: It says the assaults occurred "in residence halls", a specific place.
• Guidancepresent19/25

  Final assessment

  Majority finds the alert instructs anyone with information to contact University Police via listed channels; a minority read tip-seeking as not protective guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs anyone with information to "contact University Police" via several listed methods, protective actions.
  2. absent: It asks for information from those who know, but gives no protective action to recipients.
  3. absent: It asks for tips but gives recipients no protective action to take for safety.
  4. present: It asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" and lists reporting channels, an instruction.
  5. present: It instructs anyone with information to "contact University Police" via listed channels.
  6. absent: It asks anyone with information to contact police but gives no protective action to recipients generally.
  7. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a directed action to recipients.
  8. present: It asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" and submit a tip, an instruction to recipients.
  9. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" and use the tip app, an action.
  10. present: It asks anyone with information to contact University Police and submit tips, a protective/action instruction.
  11. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" via listed channels, an instruction to recipients.
  12. present: It instructs anyone with information to "contact University Police", "submit a tip", or "file a report".
  13. present: It instructs anyone with information to "contact University Police", a recipient action.
  14. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" and provides reporting channels, an instruction.
  15. absent: Asks for information from those who have it but gives no protective action to recipients.
  16. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a protective/action instruction.
  17. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" via listed channels.
  18. present: It asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a directed action.
  19. absent: It asks anyone with information to contact police; no protective action for recipients generally.
  20. present: It asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a directed action to recipients.
  21. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a recipient instruction.
  22. present: It asks anyone with information to "contact University Police" and submit tips, an instructed action.
  23. absent: It asks anyone with information to contact police, an investigative ask, not protective action for recipients.
  24. present: Asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a directed action.
  25. present: It asks anyone with information to "contact University Police", a directed action.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous: a specific date range is stated, between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives the range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", specific dates.
  2. present: It states the assaults occurred "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", specific dates.
  3. present: It gives the date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15".
  4. present: It cites dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", time references.
  5. present: It gives a date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15".
  6. present: It gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", clear time references.
  7. present: Gives the date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  8. present: It gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", time references.
  9. present: Says "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", specific dates for the crimes.
  10. present: It gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  11. present: Gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", conveying when.
  12. present: It gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  13. present: It gives the date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  14. present: Gives a date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  15. present: Gives the date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", conveying when.
  16. present: Gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", conveying when.
  17. present: Gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a date reference.
  18. present: It cites the date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  19. present: It gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", specific timing.
  20. present: It gives the date range "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", specific dates.
  21. present: Gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", time references.
  22. present: It gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", conveying timing.
  23. present: It cites dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  24. present: Gives dates "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", a time reference.
  25. present: It cites the span "between Sept. 27 and Nov. 15", specific dates.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Yes; unanimous that the sexual-assault warning conveys harm to a person.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Reports a student sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit stated harm to victims.
  2. present: It reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, conveying clear serious harm to victims.
  3. present: A report of a male student sexually assaulting three individuals is an explicit stated harm to people.
  4. present: It reports a male student allegedly sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit serious harm to multiple victims.
  5. present: It describes a male student alleged to have sexually assaulted three individuals, conveying serious violent harm to victims.
  6. present: It reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clear stated harm to people.
  7. present: Describes a male student sexually assaulting three individuals, which is an explicit harm to people.
  8. present: It describes a male student sexually assaulting three individuals, an explicit serious harm to people.
  9. present: States a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clearly stated harm.
  10. present: It reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clearly stated harm to people.
  11. present: It alleges a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clearly stated serious harm to people.
  12. present: Reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit serious harm to multiple people.
  13. present: Reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit statement of serious harm to people.
  14. present: States a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clearly stated harm to people.
  15. present: Describes a student sexually assaulting three individuals, a clearly stated serious harm to people.
  16. present: It states a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit serious harm to people.
  17. present: It reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals in residence halls, an explicit harm to people.
  18. present: A safety advisory alleging a student sexually assaulted three individuals conveys explicit serious harm to people.
  19. present: Reports a student sexually assaulted three individuals, conveying violent harm to people.
  20. present: It reports a student allegedly sexually assaulted three individuals, clearly stated harm to people.
  21. present: Reports a male student allegedly sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit serious harm to people.
  22. present: It reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals in residence halls, conveying explicit serious harm to people.
  23. present: It reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clearly stated harm.
  24. present: This reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, a clearly stated serious harm.
  25. present: Reports a male student sexually assaulted three individuals, an explicit serious harm to victims.