Aggravated assault reported near Lemon Street

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent24/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 24 of 25. "officers responded to an assault call" plus the ASU case number 2023-02841 mark this as a campus police bulletin; the lone dissent noted no department actually signs it.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The text says "officers responded" and cites an ASU case number, identifying campus police.
  2. present: The notice describes "officers responded" and gives a university case number, marking a police source.
  3. present: "officers responded" and the reference to the university identify a campus police source.
  4. present: It reports that "officers responded," identifying campus police as the source of the account.
  5. present: It reports that "officers responded", identifying police as the issuing authority.
  6. present: It reports that "officers responded" and describes the university, identifying the police source.
  7. present: The notice describes "officers responded", identifying campus police as the issuing authority.
  8. present: The text says "officers responded" and gives a police case number, identifying the agency.
  9. present: The notice cites "officers" responding and references "the university" as the issuer.
  10. present: The text attributes the response to "officers" and reads as a university police crime notice.
  11. present: It reports that "officers responded", identifying campus police as the issuing authority.
  12. present: It reports that "officers responded" and gives an ASU style case number, identifying police as issuer.
  13. present: The text says "officers responded" and cites a case number, identifying police as the source.
  14. present: "officers responded" and the ASU case numbering identify campus police as issuer.
  15. present: "officers responded" plus the campus case numbering identify a police authority as the source.
  16. present: It states that "officers responded to an assault call", identifying police as the reporting authority.
  17. present: It reports that "officers responded" and cites university case numbers, identifying the police source.
  18. absent: Only unnamed "officers" are mentioned; no agency, university, or alert brand signs the message.
  19. present: The notice says "officers responded", identifying a police authority behind the report.
  20. present: The notice says "officers responded", identifying campus police as the issuing authority.
  21. present: The notice says "officers responded" and names the Tempe campus, identifying the campus police.
  22. present: "officers responded to an assault call" identifies police as the reporting authority.
  23. present: The text says "officers responded" and cites a police case number, identifying the reporting authority.
  24. present: It reports that "officers responded", identifying campus police as the responding authority.
  25. present: The notice describes "officers" responding and lists a police case number, identifying law enforcement as source.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The bulletin is headed "Aggravated Assault" and describes a victim "attacked by two unknown suspects," a specific violent crime.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Aggravated Assault" and an attack by two suspects name the specific crime.
  2. present: It is headed "Aggravated Assault" and describes a victim attacked by two suspects.
  3. present: The notice is headed "Aggravated Assault" and describes a victim attacked by two suspects.
  4. present: The heading and text name "Aggravated Assault" with a victim attacked by two suspects.
  5. present: The heading and body name "Aggravated Assault" with two suspects attacking a victim.
  6. present: The heading and text name "Aggravated Assault," a specific violent crime.
  7. present: It names an "Aggravated Assault" in which a victim was attacked by two suspects.
  8. present: It is headed "Aggravated Assault" and describes a victim attacked by two suspects.
  9. present: It is headed "Aggravated Assault" and describes an attack by two suspects.
  10. present: "Aggravated Assault" and an attack by two suspects name a specific threat.
  11. present: The heading and body name an "Aggravated Assault" by two suspects.
  12. present: The heading and body name "Aggravated Assault" by two unknown suspects.
  13. present: It names "Aggravated Assault" and an attack by two unknown suspects.
  14. present: It reports an "Aggravated Assault" in which a victim was attacked by two suspects.
  15. present: The heading and body name "Aggravated Assault" by two suspects.
  16. present: "Aggravated Assault" is named in the headline and crime type field.
  17. present: The header and body name "Aggravated Assault" by two unknown suspects.
  18. present: It reports an "Aggravated Assault" in which a victim was attacked by two suspects.
  19. present: The headline and body name an "Aggravated Assault" in which a victim was attacked.
  20. present: The heading and body name an "Aggravated Assault" by two suspects.
  21. present: It is headed "Aggravated Assault" and describes a victim attacked by two suspects.
  22. present: The notice names "Aggravated Assault" with a victim attacked by two suspects.
  23. present: The heading and body name "Aggravated Assault" with a victim attacked by two suspects.
  24. present: "Aggravated Assault" and an attack by two suspects name the specific crime.
  25. present: It names an "assault call" and an "Aggravated Assault" crime type.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, with no disagreement: the attack is placed "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus" and repeated in the Location field.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It locates the assault "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  2. present: The attack is located "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  3. present: It gives "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus" as the site.
  4. present: The assault is placed "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus."
  5. present: The place is given as "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus."
  6. present: The attack is placed "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus."
  7. present: The location is given as "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  8. present: The location is "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus".
  9. present: The place is "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  10. present: The location is "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus".
  11. present: The location is "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus".
  12. present: The location is "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus", a precise address.
  13. present: The assault is placed "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  14. present: "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus" is the stated location.
  15. present: It places the attack "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  16. present: The location is "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  17. present: The location is given as "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus".
  18. present: The location is given as "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  19. present: The location is given as "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus".
  20. present: It locates the attack "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
  21. present: The location is "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus."
  22. present: It gives "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus" as the site.
  23. present: It specifies "711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus" as the assault location.
  24. present: The location is given as "711 E. Lemon Street, Tempe campus".
  25. present: The location is "near 711 E. Lemon St. on Tempe campus".
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. The notice ends in case fields, "Suspect description: Unknown," and never asks readers to take a protective step or even to call in tips.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective action or safety instruction is directed at recipients.
  2. absent: Readers are given no protective instruction, only case and suspect details.
  3. absent: No protective action is requested of readers, only case details are listed.
  4. absent: No protective action or safety instruction is directed at recipients anywhere in the notice.
  5. absent: No action is requested of readers; the notice is purely informational.
  6. absent: The notice gives facts and case details but asks recipients to do nothing protective.
  7. absent: Nothing tells the reader to take any protective step or report information.
  8. absent: Nothing instructs the reader to take any protective action.
  9. absent: The bulletin reports facts and case details but asks nothing of recipients.
  10. absent: No protective action is requested of readers anywhere in the notice.
  11. absent: No protective action or safety instruction is directed at recipients.
  12. absent: No protective action is requested of readers, only case details are listed.
  13. absent: The notice gives no protective instruction to readers, only incident facts.
  14. absent: No protective advice or action is requested of readers anywhere in the notice.
  15. absent: No protective action or reporting instruction is directed at readers.
  16. absent: The notice recounts the investigation but never tells readers what to do to stay safe.
  17. absent: The notice provides only incident facts and no protective instruction to readers.
  18. absent: No protective action is requested of readers, not even a tip line to call.
  19. absent: No protective action is asked of readers, the text is purely informational reporting.
  20. absent: No protective action is asked of readers; the notice is purely descriptive of the case.
  21. absent: No protective action is asked of readers; the text is purely informational.
  22. absent: No protective action is requested of readers; the notice only recounts the investigation.
  23. absent: No protective instruction is given to readers, only investigative facts and suspect details.
  24. absent: The notice offers no instruction to recipients, only case and suspect details.
  25. absent: Nothing tells readers to take any protective action; the text is purely descriptive.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25, fixed by "At approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023," an explicit date and hour for the assault.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  2. present: It states "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023".
  3. present: "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" gives a precise time and date.
  4. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  5. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023."
  6. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  7. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the incident time.
  8. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  9. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  10. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  11. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023".
  12. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the incident time.
  13. present: It specifies "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023".
  14. present: "At approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" gives the time and date.
  15. present: "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" is an explicit date and time.
  16. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the incident time.
  17. present: It states "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023".
  18. present: It states "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time of the attack.
  19. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the incident time.
  20. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the incident time.
  21. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023."
  22. present: "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" is a precise time and date.
  23. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023", an exact date and time.
  24. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023" as the time.
  25. present: It gives "approximately 2:00 a.m. Friday, October 27, 2023".
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The harm is stated plainly: the victim was "transported to the hospital with serious, but not life-threatening injuries."

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The victim was "transported to the hospital with serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm.
  2. present: The victim suffered "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying the harm caused.
  3. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized "with serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm severity.
  4. present: It states the victim went to hospital with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries," conveying severity.
  5. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries."
  6. present: It states the victim went to hospital with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries."
  7. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying severity.
  8. present: The victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying severity.
  9. present: The victim suffered "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying real harm.
  10. present: The victim suffered "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", an explicit severity statement.
  11. present: It states the victim went to hospital with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries".
  12. present: It reports the victim went to hospital with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm.
  13. present: The victim suffered "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", an explicit statement of harm.
  14. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries."
  15. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm.
  16. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying severity.
  17. present: It reports the victim suffered "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating the harm caused.
  18. present: The victim was "transported to the hospital with serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm severity.
  19. present: It reports the victim went to hospital with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating severity.
  20. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm severity.
  21. present: It reports the victim was hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries."
  22. present: It reports the victim hospitalized with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm done.
  23. present: The victim went to hospital with "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", stating harm severity.
  24. present: It reports the victim suffered "serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying severity.
  25. present: It reports the victim "transported to the hospital with serious, but not life-threatening injuries", conveying harm severity.