Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
ASU

Yik Yak bomb claims evacuated three buildings overnight; three students arrested

AI-generated · every claim is source-linked
AZbomb threatemergency notificationhigh confidence
Confirmed HoaxDetermined to be a hoax. The institutional response is documented because it reveals how the alert system performed under a perceived real threat.

Shortly before 9:30 p.m. MST on September 12, 2022, Arizona State University Police received reports of multiple Yik Yak posts claiming bombs had been placed in the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residence Hall. The posts escalated into a bizarre one-upmanship: one student wrote 'I put the bomb in the MU,' another replied 'No, I put the bomb in the MU,' and a third chimed in 'It's OK guys we all put the bomb in the MU.' The MU, Hassayampa Academic Village, and Barrett Residential Complex were evacuated and swept overnight; no items of concern were found. Three students were arrested and charged with a felony and four misdemeanors each.

Alerts
2
Response
Killed
Injured
Institution
Arizona State University
Public R1 · AZ
All ASU cases →
~83,000 studentsASU Alert
Official alert policy
Read when and how ASU says it will use ASU Alert: summarized, quoted, and analyzed.
Documented Timeline

Alert Sequence

2 messages in sequence · 2 verified verbatim

INITIAL ALERTTwitter/X
Verified verbatim@ASUPolice on X (verbatim raw t.co)170 chars
POLICE SITUATION - Tempe campus ASUPD is working a Police Situation at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls. Stay clear of the area until further notice.
Exact text from official @ASUPolice X status 1569560809982013440 including line breaks.
ALL CLEARTwitter/X+2h 55m
FINAL UPDATE - Tempe campus All incidents cleared. No items found. All campus activity is cleared to return to normal.
Verbatim full text from official @ASUPolice X final update status 1569604902057558017.
Preserves "No items found" and campus-return language exactly.
Message elements

How the first alert is built

To check this alert, Claude (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

POLICE SITUATION - Tempe campus ASUPD is working a Police Situation at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls. Stay clear of the area until further notice.

  • Sourcepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the element is present: it names ASUPD as working the situation, identifying the authority.

    Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It names "ASUPD" as working the situation.
    2. present: It names "ASUPD" as working the situation.
    3. present: It names "ASUPD".
    4. present: It names "ASUPD", the responding police authority.
    5. present: It names "ASUPD", the university police department.
    6. present: It names "ASUPD" working the situation, identifying the responding authority.
    7. present: It names "ASUPD", the responding police authority.
    8. present: It names "ASUPD" as working the situation.
    9. present: "ASUPD" identifies the sender.
    10. present: It names "ASUPD", the university police.
    11. present: It names "ASUPD" as working the situation.
    12. present: It names "ASUPD" as working the situation.
    13. present: It names "ASUPD", the university police.
    14. present: It names "ASUPD" working the situation, the issuing authority.
    15. present: It names "ASUPD" working the situation.
    16. present: It names "ASUPD" (Arizona State University Police), identifying the authority.
    17. present: It names "ASUPD", the police authority working the situation.
    18. present: It names "ASUPD".
    19. present: It references "ASUPD" working the situation.
    20. present: It names "ASUPD".
    21. present: It names "ASUPD" (police) as working the situation, the authority.
    22. present: Names "ASUPD" working the situation.
    23. present: Names "ASUPD" as the police working the situation.
    24. present: "ASUPD" names the responding police authority.
    25. present: It names "ASUPD" as working the situation.
  • Hazardabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the element is absent: it labels a police situation but names no specific hazard.

    What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" and "Police Situation" but names no specific hazard.
    2. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    3. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" generically without naming a specific hazard.
    4. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    5. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific threat.
    6. absent: It cites a "POLICE SITUATION" generically and names no specific threat.
    7. absent: It refers only to a "Police Situation" with no specific threat named.
    8. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    9. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    10. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    11. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific threat or hazard.
    12. absent: It says only "POLICE SITUATION", which is generic and does not name the hazard.
    13. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" and "Police Situation" but names no specific hazard.
    14. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    15. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but never names a specific threat.
    16. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific threat or hazard.
    17. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" only, naming no specific hazard.
    18. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" being worked but names no specific hazard.
    19. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" without naming any specific threat.
    20. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    21. absent: It says "POLICE SITUATION" but names no specific hazard.
    22. absent: Says "POLICE SITUATION"; no specific hazard is named.
    23. absent: Says "POLICE SITUATION" and "Police Situation", which are generic.
    24. absent: "POLICE SITUATION" is generic and names no specific hazard or threat.
    25. absent: It cites a "Police Situation" only, naming no specific hazard.
  • Locationpresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the element is present: it names the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls on the Tempe campus.

    Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on "Tempe campus".
    2. present: It locates it "at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    3. present: It says "Tempe campus ... Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    4. present: It says "Tempe campus" and "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    5. present: It locates it at "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on "Tempe campus".
    6. present: It specifies "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on the Tempe campus, locations.
    7. present: It locates it at "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on "Tempe campus", a specific place.
    8. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    9. present: It locates it "at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on "Tempe campus".
    10. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    11. present: It specifies "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on Tempe campus.
    12. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on Tempe campus.
    13. present: It names "Tempe campus", "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    14. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on the "Tempe campus", specific places.
    15. present: It locates it at "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on Tempe campus.
    16. present: It names "Tempe campus", "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls", specific places.
    17. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls", specific places.
    18. present: It locates it at "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    19. present: It locates it "at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on "Tempe campus".
    20. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls" on Tempe campus.
    21. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    22. present: Names "Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    23. present: Locates it at "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
    24. present: It names "the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls", specific places.
    25. present: It locates it "at the Memorial Union and Hassayampa Residential Halls".
  • Guidancepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the element is present: it instructs recipients to stay clear of the area until further notice.

    The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    2. present: It instructs to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    3. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    4. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    5. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    6. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice", a protective action.
    7. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice", a protective action.
    8. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    9. present: It tells recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    10. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    11. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    12. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    13. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    14. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice", a protective action.
    15. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    16. present: It instructs to "Stay clear of the area until further notice", a protective action.
    17. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    18. present: It instructs to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    19. present: It instructs recipients to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    20. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    21. present: It instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    22. present: Instructs "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    23. present: Instructs to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
    24. present: It instructs to "Stay clear of the area until further notice", a protective action.
    25. present: It instructs to "Stay clear of the area until further notice".
  • Timepresent25/25

    Final assessment

    All 25 reads agree the element is present: the phrase until further notice conveys a recency timeframe.

    When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. present: The phrase "until further notice" conveys a recency timeframe.
    2. present: The phrase "until further notice" conveys an open-ended timeframe.
    3. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    4. present: It says "until further notice".
    5. present: The phrase "until further notice" conveys duration timing.
    6. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    7. present: It conveys recency with "is working" now and "until further notice".
    8. present: It says "until further notice", a duration recency cue.
    9. present: It says "until further notice", a timing cue.
    10. present: It uses "until further notice", a recency cue.
    11. present: It uses the recency cue "until further notice".
    12. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    13. present: It says "until further notice", a duration cue.
    14. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    15. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    16. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    17. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    18. present: It uses "until further notice" as a recency cue.
    19. present: The phrase "until further notice" conveys a duration cue.
    20. present: It says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    21. present: It uses "until further notice", a recency cue.
    22. present: Says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    23. present: Says "until further notice", a recency cue.
    24. present: "until further notice" conveys a recency/duration cue.
    25. present: It conveys recency with "until further notice".
  • Impactabsent0/25

    Final assessment

    Absent by unanimous agreement: a police situation is named with a stay-clear instruction but no stated harm, danger, or consequence.

    What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

    See all 25 individual reads
    1. absent: Describes a police situation and tells people to stay clear with no stated danger.
    2. absent: Names a police situation and asks people to stay clear but states no harm.
    3. absent: It describes a police situation and asks people to stay clear without stating any harm or severity.
    4. absent: It describes a police situation and to stay clear but never states the danger or its potential harm.
    5. absent: Reports a police situation and to stay clear with no stated harm or consequence.
    6. absent: It labels a police situation and says stay clear but states no harm or severity.
    7. absent: Names a police situation and says stay clear but states no danger or consequence.
    8. absent: Describes a police situation and to stay clear with no stated harm or consequence.
    9. absent: Mentions a police situation and asks people to stay clear with no stated harm or consequence.
    10. absent: Describes a police situation and says stay clear but states no danger or consequence.
    11. absent: Names a police situation and asks people to stay clear but states no harm or severity.
    12. absent: Names a police situation and asks people to stay clear but states no specific harm.
    13. absent: Describes a police situation and tells people to stay clear without stating any harm or severity.
    14. absent: States a police situation and to stay clear of the area with no stated harm or severity.
    15. absent: It describes a police situation and tells people to stay clear but states no specific harm or severity.
    16. absent: Describes a police situation and tells people to stay clear with no stated harm or consequence.
    17. absent: Names a police situation and tells people to stay clear but states no harm or severity.
    18. absent: Names a police situation and stay clear but states no specific harm or severity.
    19. absent: It names a police situation and tells people to stay clear but states no harm or consequence.
    20. absent: Reports a police situation and to stay clear but states no harm or consequence.
    21. absent: Names a police situation and to stay clear but states no harm or severity.
    22. absent: It labels a police situation and tells people to stay clear of the area but states no specific harm or danger.
    23. absent: Reports a police situation and asks people to stay clear with no stated harm or consequence.
    24. absent: Describes a police situation and to stay clear with no stated danger or consequence.
    25. absent: It names a police situation and asks people to stay clear but states no specific danger or harm.

Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.

About this analysis
Context

Background

On the evening of September 12, 2022, a series of anonymous Yik Yak posts claiming bombs had been placed set off a costly overnight bomb scare at Arizona State University. According to court documents cited by the Arizona State Press, 21-year-old Trevor Benoit wrote 'I put the bomb in the MU' on Yik Yak; 18-year-old Lukas Patton replied 'No, I put the bomb in the MU' and subsequently added 'It's OK guys we all put the bomb in the MU'; 18-year-old Peter Fraenkel also posted a threat referencing Hassayampa. The posts triggered a multi-building evacuation of the Memorial Union (ASU's main student center) plus Hassayampa Academic Village and the Barrett Residential Complex. ASU Police, Tempe Police, and Chandler Police deployed K-9 units and swept the buildings overnight; no threats were found. All three students were arrested and charged with a felony count of interference/disruption of an educational institution and four misdemeanor charges. ASU is among the largest universities in the United States by enrollment, and the Memorial Union is a hub for tens of thousands of students, making the evacuation disruptive. The case is notable for illustrating how Yik Yak's relaunch created an environment where users underestimated law enforcement's ability to trace their posts.
Outcome
No explosives found. Evacuation lasted overnight into September 13. Three students (Lukas Patton, 18; Peter Fraenkel, 18; and Trevor Benoit, 21) were arrested and charged with felony interference/disruption of an educational institution and four misdemeanor counts each.
Provenance

Sources

  1. News
  2. Student Paper
  3. News
  4. News
  5. Student Paper
  6. Social
  7. Social
Cite this case

Campus Alert Archive. "Arizona State University: Yik Yak bomb claims evacuated three buildings overnight; three students arrested." Incident of September 12, 2022. Added May 2026; last updated July 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/arizona-state-university-yikyak-bomb-threat-2022-09-12/

Download case JSON

Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.

Tags
bomb-threatyik-yaksocial-media-threatstudent-suspectarrest-madearizonatempepublic-r1anonymous-appmulti-agency-responseevening-threatHoax
Added May 2026Updated July 2026Via ingestion