Tornado warning includes Russellville campus; expires

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "Arkansas Tech University", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "Arkansas Tech University", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "Arkansas Tech University".
  3. present: Source is present because "Arkansas Tech University" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("Arkansas Tech University") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "Arkansas Tech University".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "Arkansas Tech University".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "Arkansas Tech University".
  8. present: Branded language "Arkansas Tech University" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "Arkansas Tech University" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "Arkansas Tech University".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "Arkansas Tech University" as institutional source.
  12. present: "Arkansas Tech University" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "Arkansas Tech University".
  14. present: Source scores present: "Arkansas Tech University" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "Arkansas Tech University".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("Arkansas Tech University") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "Arkansas Tech University".
  18. present: "Arkansas Tech University" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "Arkansas Tech University".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "Arkansas Tech University".
  21. present: Readers see "Arkansas Tech University" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "Arkansas Tech University" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "Arkansas Tech University".
  24. present: The phrase "Arkansas Tech University" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "Arkansas Tech University".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "tornado warning".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "tornado warning".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "tornado warning".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "tornado warning", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "tornado warning" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "tornado warning".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "tornado warning".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "tornado warning".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "tornado warning" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "tornado warning".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "tornado warning".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "tornado warning".
  12. present: "tornado warning" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "tornado warning".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "tornado warning".
  15. present: Named condition "tornado warning" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "tornado warning" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "tornado warning".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "tornado warning".
  19. present: "tornado warning" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "tornado warning".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "tornado warning".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "tornado warning".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "tornado warning".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "tornado warning".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "tornado warning".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "The National Weather Service has issued…".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given through "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  2. present: Place is specified as "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  3. present: Where is answered by "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  4. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" functions as the location element.
  5. present: The alert situates the event with "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  6. present: Geographic or campus place: "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  7. present: L=1 because "The National Weather Service has issued…" names where this applies.
  8. present: Recipients are told the place via "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  9. present: Location present in the phrase "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  10. present: A campus or building reference "The National Weather Service has issued…" covers location.
  11. present: The where cue is "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  12. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" identifies the affected area.
  13. present: Place naming succeeds with "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  14. present: Location codes yes on "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  15. present: Site detail appears as "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  16. present: The message anchors place with "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  17. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" is enough location under the rubric.
  18. present: Affected place language: "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  19. present: L is present via "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  20. present: Campus geography is marked by "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  21. present: Where this matters is "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  22. present: The text localizes to "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  23. present: Location element met by "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  24. present: Place is not left blank: "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  25. present: Spatial reference "The National Weather Service has issued…" supports L=1.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No protective action or operational instruction is given to recipients.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective action or operational instruction is given to recipients.
  2. absent: Guidance is absent: the text does not tell people what to do.
  3. absent: There is no shelter, avoid, evacuate, remote, or similar directive.
  4. absent: G=0 because audience-facing instructions are missing.
  5. absent: The message reports status without directing action.
  6. absent: No what-to-do language appears.
  7. absent: Guidance fails: pure information without orders.
  8. absent: Recipients are not told a protective step.
  9. absent: Instructional content is not present.
  10. absent: The alert omits guidance to the public.
  11. absent: Without a directive, G is zero.
  12. absent: No action line is addressed to readers.
  13. absent: Guidance element codes absent.
  14. absent: What-to-do is left unstated.
  15. absent: The text does not instruct avoidance, shelter, or closure behavior.
  16. absent: Audience guidance is missing from the body.
  17. absent: G fails the protective-action test.
  18. absent: No operational instruction is issued.
  19. absent: Readers get facts but not orders.
  20. absent: Guidance not established here.
  21. absent: Directive language is absent.
  22. absent: The message never tells recipients how to act.
  23. absent: No shelter/evacuate/remote/close instruction appears.
  24. absent: G is absent on non-directive wording.
  25. absent: Protective guidance cannot be coded present.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "The National Weather Service has issued…".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  3. present: When is answered with "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  4. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "The National Weather Service has issued…" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  8. present: Temporal detail "The National Weather Service has issued…" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  11. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  13. present: T codes yes on "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "The National Weather Service has issued…" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  17. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "The National Weather Service has issued…" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  20. present: Date or hour language "The National Weather Service has issued…" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  22. present: The when signal is "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  23. present: Time present through "The National Weather Service has issued…".
  24. present: "The National Weather Service has issued…" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "The National Weather Service has issued…" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.