A man grabs a woman from behind outside an art studio

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present and 0 absent. The alder notice says the information was provided by the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder notice says the information was provided by the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  2. present: The basswood review finds a source because the alert credits the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  3. present: The cypress alert identifies Case Western Reserve University Police Department as the information source and names the Division of Public Safety.
  4. present: The dogwood message identifies Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety as the source.
  5. present: An elder can tell who sent this because the text names Case Western Reserve University Police Department as the source of the information.
  6. present: The fir notice names Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety.
  7. present: The ginkgo alert says the information was provided by Case Western Reserve University Police Department, which identifies the authority.
  8. present: The hemlock message identifies the Case Western Reserve University Police Department as the authority that provided the information.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds a source because the text says information was provided by the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  10. present: The junco reading finds the issuing authority in Case Western Reserve University Police Department and Division of Public Safety.
  11. present: The larch alert says the information was provided by the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  12. present: The mahogany alert identifies the Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety as sources.
  13. present: Information is attributed to the Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety, so the oak source element is present.
  14. present: The poplar alert says information was provided by the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the authority is Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks source present because the message credits the Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds a source because information is attributed to the Case Western Reserve University Police Department and Division of Public Safety.
  18. present: The tupelo alert identifies Case Western Reserve University Police Department as the source of the information.
  19. present: The walnut notice says information was provided by Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  20. present: The acorn review marks source present because the message credits Case Western Reserve University Police Department and Division of Public Safety.
  21. present: The beech alert says information was provided by the Case Western Reserve University Police Department.
  22. present: The cottonwood alert cites Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety as the authority.
  23. present: The hickory message credits Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety.
  24. present: The sycamore message names Case Western Reserve University Police Department and the Division of Public Safety as the sources.
  25. present: Information provided by Case Western Reserve University Police Department identifies the issuing authority in this teak alert.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. The alder text names fondling and sexual imposition and describes a grab without consent.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder text names fondling and sexual imposition and describes a grab without consent.
  2. present: The basswood review finds a hazard because the crime is named Fondling/Sexual Imposition and described as a nonconsensual grab.
  3. present: The cypress text names fondling and sexual imposition, which is a specific crime.
  4. present: The dogwood text names the specific crime Fondling/Sexual Imposition and describes an unwanted grab.
  5. present: An elder can tell the hazard because the text names fondling and sexual imposition.
  6. present: The fir text names Fondling/Sexual Imposition and describes an unwanted grab from behind.
  7. present: The ginkgo text names "Fondling/Sexual Imposition" and describes a suspect grabbing the victim without consent.
  8. present: The hemlock alert names the specific crime Fondling/Sexual Imposition rather than a generic incident.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds a hazard because the text names "Fondling/Sexual Imposition" and says the suspect grabbed the victim without consent.
  10. present: The junco reading finds a specific threat named as fondling and sexual imposition, including a nonconsensual grab.
  11. present: The larch text names the specific crime Fondling/Sexual Imposition and describes a grab without consent.
  12. present: The mahogany text names fondling and sexual imposition and describes a grab without consent.
  13. present: It names the crime fondling and sexual imposition and says the suspect grabbed the victim's buttocks without consent, so the oak hazard element is present.
  14. present: The poplar text names the specific crime Fondling/Sexual Imposition rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the hazard is fondling and sexual imposition after the suspect grabbed the victim without consent.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks hazard present because it names Fondling/Sexual Imposition, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds a hazard because the alert names Fondling/Sexual Imposition and describes a nonconsensual grab.
  18. present: The tupelo text names Fondling/Sexual Imposition, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  19. present: The walnut text names fondling and sexual imposition, a specific crime rather than a vague incident.
  20. present: The acorn review marks hazard present because it names Fondling/Sexual Imposition rather than a generic incident.
  21. present: The beech text names fondling and sexual imposition and describes a nonconsensual grab.
  22. present: The cottonwood text names Fondling/Sexual Imposition and describes a nonconsensual grab, a specific threat.
  23. present: The hickory text names fondling and sexual imposition after a nonconsensual grab, a specific crime.
  24. present: The sycamore text names the specific crimes fondling and sexual imposition.
  25. present: It names Fondling/Sexual Imposition and says the suspect grabbed her buttocks without consent, a specific teak threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. The alder alert locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder alert locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  2. present: The basswood review finds a location at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  3. present: The cypress message locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio.
  4. present: The dogwood alert gives the place as 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  5. present: An elder can tell where it happened because the text says 2215 Adelbert Road outside of the Art Studio.
  6. present: The fir alert locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside the Art Studio.
  7. present: The ginkgo message places the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  8. present: The hemlock text places the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds a location because the incident is placed at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  10. present: The junco reading finds the place given as 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  11. present: The larch alert locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside of the Art Studio.
  12. present: The mahogany message locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside the Art Studio.
  13. present: It gives the place as 2215 Adelbert Road outside of the Art Studio, so the oak location element is present.
  14. present: The poplar message locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the location is 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks location present because it gives 2215 Adelbert Road, outside the Art Studio.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds a location because the alert gives 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  18. present: The tupelo alert gives the incident location as 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  19. present: The walnut alert gives the place as 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio.
  20. present: The acorn review marks location present because it gives 2215 Adelbert Road, outside of the Art Studio.
  21. present: The beech message locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio.
  22. present: The cottonwood message locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio.
  23. present: The hickory alert places the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio.
  24. present: The sycamore alert locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road, outside the Art Studio.
  25. present: It locates the incident at 2215 Adelbert Road outside the Art Studio in this teak message.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. The alder message instructs people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder message instructs people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  2. present: The basswood review finds guidance in the instructions to call CWRU police, alter your route, or duck into a store.
  3. present: The cypress alert instructs people to call CWRU police, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  4. present: The dogwood text tells threatened recipients to call CWRU police, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  5. present: An elder is instructed to call CWRU police if threatened, alter a route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  6. present: The fir message tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help.
  7. present: The ginkgo alert tells recipients to call CWRU police if threatened, to alter their route, or to duck into a store.
  8. present: The hemlock alert tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds guidance because recipients are told to call CWRU police if threatened, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  10. present: The junco reading finds instructions to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter your route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  11. present: The larch message instructs threatened people to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  12. present: The mahogany alert instructs recipients to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store if nervous.
  13. present: It tells recipients who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help, so the oak guidance element is present.
  14. present: The poplar alert tells people to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store if nervous.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, readers are told to call CWRU police, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks guidance present because it tells threatened recipients to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds guidance because it tells people who feel nervous to alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  18. present: The tupelo message instructs anyone who feels threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or call for help.
  19. present: The walnut message instructs recipients to call CWRU police if threatened, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  20. present: The acorn review marks guidance present because it instructs people to call police, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  21. present: The beech alert instructs nervous people to alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  22. present: The cottonwood alert tells people to call CWRU police if threatened, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  23. present: The hickory message instructs people to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store.
  24. present: The sycamore text tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, duck into a store, or call for help.
  25. present: It instructs people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or duck into a store, which is teak guidance.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time present and 0 absent. The alder alert states that the incident occurred on March 26, 2025 at 4:17 p.m.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder alert states that the incident occurred on March 26, 2025 at 4:17 p.m.
  2. present: The basswood review finds time in the date March 26, 2025 and the clock time 4:17 p.m.
  3. present: The cypress text gives a release date of 26 March 2025 and an incident time of 4:17 pm.
  4. present: The dogwood alert states the incident date March 26, 2025 and the clock time 4:17 p.m.
  5. present: An elder can tell when it happened because the text gives March 26, 2025 at 4:17 pm.
  6. present: The fir text states the incident was on March 26, 2025, at 4:17 p.m.
  7. present: The ginkgo text states the release date 26 March 2025 and the incident time 4:17 p.m.
  8. present: The hemlock message includes the incident date March 26, 2025 and the clock time 4:17 p.m.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds time because the text dates the incident March 26, 2025 at 4:17 p.m. and the report at 4:35 p.m.
  10. present: The junco reading finds dates and clock times, including March 26, 2025 and 4:17 p.m.
  11. present: The larch alert states the incident date March 26, 2025 and the time 4:17 p.m.
  12. present: The mahogany notice states that the incident occurred on March 26, 2025 at 4:17 pm.
  13. present: It states a release date of 26 March 2025 and an incident time of 4:17 pm, so the oak time element is present.
  14. present: The poplar text states the incident occurred on March 26, 2025 at 4:17 p.m.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the release date is 26 March 2025 and the incident time is 4:17 pm.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks time present because it states March 26, 2025, 4:17 p.m., and a 4:35 p.m. report time.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds time because it states March 26, 2025, at 4:17 p.m., and a report time of 4:35 p.m.
  18. present: The tupelo alert states the incident occurred at 4:17 p.m. on March 26, 2025.
  19. present: The walnut text states the incident date March 26, 2025 and the time 4:17 p.m.
  20. present: The acorn review marks time present because it gives 26 March 2025 and an incident time of 4:17 p.m.
  21. present: The beech notice states March 26, 2025, at 4:17 p.m. and a 4:35 p.m. report time.
  22. present: The cottonwood text states March 26, 2025 and 4:17 p.m. as when the incident occurred.
  23. present: The hickory text states March 26, 2025 at 4:17 p.m. as the incident time.
  24. present: The sycamore alert gives the release date 26 March 2025 and the incident time 4:17 p.m.
  25. present: It states the incident date March 26, 2025 and the time 4:17 p.m., so teak time is present.
• Impactpresent19/25

  Final assessment

  19 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 6 absent. The alder text says the perpetrators' actions make the campus less safe and mentions a threat to health or safety.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder text says the perpetrators' actions make the campus less safe and mentions a threat to health or safety.
  2. present: The basswood review finds impact because the suspect grabbed the victim's buttocks without consent, which is stated harm to a person.
  3. present: The cypress message says these actions make campus less safe and refers to a threat to health or safety.
  4. absent: The dogwood message names fondling but states no further consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  5. present: An elder can see harm to a person because the text states the suspect grabbed the victim without consent.
  6. present: The fir alert says these actions make campus less safe and refers to an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  7. present: The ginkgo message says perpetrators make campus less safe and mentions an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees.
  8. present: The hemlock text says the suspect grabbed the victim without consent, that such actions make campus less safe, and that health or safety is threatened.
  9. absent: The ironwood reading finds no impact because fondling names the hazard, and no injury, danger, or other severity is stated.
  10. absent: The junco reading finds no statement of harm or severity beyond the crime name and shared safety boilerplate.
  11. present: The larch text says perpetrators make campus less safe and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  12. present: The mahogany wording says these actions make campus less safe and refers to a threat to health or safety.
  13. present: It says these crimes make our campus less safe and mentions an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees, so the oak impact element is present.
  14. present: The poplar message says these actions make campus less safe and refers to a threat to health or safety.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, severity is conveyed by less safe and by an ongoing threat to the health or safety of students or employees.
  16. absent: The sequoia review marks impact absent because grabbing without consent only restates the fondling and gives no separate harm or severity.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds impact because it says the perpetrators' actions make campus less safe and refers to a threat to health or safety.
  18. absent: The tupelo text describes the fondling but states no separate consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  19. present: The walnut alert says those actions make campus less safe and cites a threat to health or safety.
  20. present: The acorn review marks impact present because it says these actions make campus less safe and names a threat to health or safety.
  21. present: The beech text says these crimes make campus less safe and refers to a threat to health or safety.
  22. present: The cottonwood message describes unwanted contact that makes campus less safe and threatens health or safety.
  23. present: The hickory alert says these actions make campus less safe and cites a threat to health or safety.
  24. present: The sycamore wording says the perpetrators' actions make campus less safe and mentions a threat to health or safety.
  25. absent: Describing the grab states the crime itself and adds no consequence or severity such as injury or danger in this teak text.