A delivery driver enters a residence and sexually assaults a student

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present and 0 absent. The alder message names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder message names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authority.
  2. present: The basswood review finds the sender named as Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department.
  3. present: The cypress text names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the sender.
  4. present: The dogwood alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the University Police Department as the sender.
  5. present: An elder can tell who sent this because the text names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department.
  6. present: The fir alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authority.
  7. present: The ginkgo alert identifies the sender as Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police.
  8. present: The hemlock alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the University Police Department as the issuing authority.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds a source because the alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department.
  10. present: The junco reading finds the sender named as Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department.
  11. present: The larch alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authority.
  12. present: The mahogany alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authorities.
  13. present: The message names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police, so the oak source element is present.
  14. present: The poplar text names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department as the sender.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department as the issuing authority.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks source present because the alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds a source because the alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police department.
  18. present: The tupelo alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the sender.
  19. present: The walnut message names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authority.
  20. present: The acorn review marks source present because the alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police.
  21. present: The beech alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the issuing authority.
  22. present: The cottonwood alert names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the sender.
  23. present: The hickory message names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the sender.
  24. present: The sycamore message identifies the sender as Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police.
  25. present: The message names Case Western Reserve University Division of Public Safety and the university police as the senders in this teak reading.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present and 0 absent. The alder text names the specific crime of rape and states that the victim was sexually assaulted.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder text names the specific crime of rape and states that the victim was sexually assaulted.
  2. present: The basswood review finds a specific hazard because the alert names Rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  3. present: The cypress alert states the specific crime of rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  4. present: The dogwood text names the specific crime Rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  5. present: An elder can tell the hazard because the text names the crime as rape and says the student was sexually assaulted.
  6. present: The fir text states the specific crime Rape and says the driver sexually assaulted the student.
  7. present: The ginkgo text names the specific threat "Rape" and says the driver sexually assaulted the student.
  8. present: The hemlock text states the specific hazard as Rape and says the driver sexually assaulted the student.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds a hazard because the text names the specific crime "Rape" and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  10. present: The junco reading finds a specific threat named as rape and a sexual assault, not a generic incident.
  11. present: The larch text names the specific crime Rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  12. present: The mahogany text names the specific crime of rape and states that the victim was sexually assaulted.
  13. present: It states the crime as rape and says the driver sexually assaulted the student, so the oak hazard element is present.
  14. present: The poplar alert states the specific hazard with the words Crime: Rape.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the specific hazard is rape, and the text says the driver sexually assaulted the student.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks hazard present because the text names Rape and describes a sexual assault, which is a specific threat.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds a hazard because the alert names the specific crime Rape and states the victim was sexually assaulted.
  18. present: The tupelo text names the specific crime Rape and says the student was sexually assaulted.
  19. present: The walnut text names the specific crime of rape and states that the victim was sexually assaulted.
  20. present: The acorn review marks hazard present because the text names Rape and says the driver sexually assaulted the student.
  21. present: The beech text states the specific crime of rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  22. present: The cottonwood text names the specific crime Rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  23. present: The hickory text states the crime is rape and that the victim was sexually assaulted, a specific threat.
  24. present: The sycamore text states the specific crime rape and says the victim was sexually assaulted.
  25. present: It names the specific crime Rape and says the driver sexually assaulted the student, so the teak hazard is stated.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present and 0 absent. The alder alert places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder alert places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  2. present: The basswood review finds a location because the incident is placed at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  3. present: The cypress message gives the place as Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  4. present: The dogwood message places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1, a named place.
  5. present: An elder can tell where it happened because the text says Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  6. present: The fir message gives the place as Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  7. present: The ginkgo message says the incident was at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  8. present: The hemlock message locates the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds a location because the incident is placed at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  10. present: The junco reading finds the place given as Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  11. present: The larch alert places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1, a named location.
  12. present: The mahogany message places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  13. present: It places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1, so the oak location element is present.
  14. present: The poplar message says the incident was at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the incident place is given as Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks location present because it places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds a location because the alert places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  18. present: The tupelo alert places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  19. present: The walnut alert places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  20. present: The acorn review marks location present because it places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  21. present: The beech message places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  22. present: The cottonwood message gives the place Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  23. present: The hickory alert gives the place as Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  24. present: The sycamore alert gives the place as Triangle Apartments, Building 1.
  25. present: It places the incident at Triangle Apartments, Building 1, a named place in this teak text.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 0 absent. The alder notice tells anyone who feels threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder notice tells anyone who feels threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help.
  2. present: The basswood review finds guidance because recipients are told to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter their route or call for help.
  3. present: The cypress alert tells recipients to call police if threatened, alter their route, or phone in information.
  4. present: The dogwood alert tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or call for help.
  5. present: An elder is instructed to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter a route or call for help.
  6. present: The fir alert instructs recipients to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter their route or call for help.
  7. present: The ginkgo alert instructs people with information to call police and tells anyone who feels unsafe to alter their route or call for help.
  8. present: The hemlock alert instructs recipients to call CWRU police if they feel threatened and to alter their route or call for help.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds guidance because recipients are told to call CWRU police if threatened, alter their route, or call for help.
  10. present: The junco reading finds instructions to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter your route or call for help.
  11. present: The larch message tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help.
  12. present: The mahogany alert tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help.
  13. present: It instructs people who feel threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help, so the oak guidance element is present.
  14. present: The poplar alert instructs recipients to call police and to alter their route or call for help if threatened.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, recipients are told to call police with information and to alter their route or call for help if nervous.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks guidance present because it instructs recipients to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter their route or call for help.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds guidance because recipients are told to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter their route or call for help.
  18. present: The tupelo message tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or call for help.
  19. present: The walnut alert tells people to call police if threatened, alter their route, or phone in information.
  20. present: The acorn review marks guidance present because it tells readers to call police, alter their route, or call for help.
  21. present: The beech alert tells people who feel threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or call for help.
  22. present: The cottonwood alert tells recipients to call CWRU police if threatened and to alter their route or call for help.
  23. present: The hickory message tells recipients to call police, alter their route, or call for help.
  24. present: The sycamore text instructs anyone who feels threatened to call CWRU police, alter their route, or call for help.
  25. present: It tells readers who feel threatened to call CWRU police and to alter their route or call for help, a teak protective instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Time present and 0 absent. The alder alert gives the incident date of July 4, 2025 and a time of approximately 11 p.m.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder alert gives the incident date of July 4, 2025 and a time of approximately 11 p.m.
  2. present: The basswood review finds time because the alert gives July 4, 2025 and approximately 11 p.m.
  3. present: The cypress text includes the date July 4, 2025, a time near 11 pm, and a report time on July 5.
  4. present: The dogwood text gives the incident date July 4, 2025 and the time approximately 11 p.m.
  5. present: An elder can tell when it happened because the text gives July 4, 2025 at approximately 11 pm.
  6. present: The fir text gives the incident date July 4, 2025, at about 11 p.m., plus the report time.
  7. present: The ginkgo text gives the incident date July 4, 2025, the time approximately 11 p.m., and the report time 12:24 a.m.
  8. present: The hemlock alert gives the incident date July 4, 2025 and the clock time of approximately 11 p.m.
  9. present: The ironwood reading finds time because the text gives July 4, 2025, about 11 p.m., and a report time of July 5, 2025 at 12:24 a.m.
  10. present: The junco reading finds dates and clock times, including July 4, 2025 and approximately 11 p.m.
  11. present: The larch alert gives the incident date July 4, 2025 and the time approximately 11 p.m.
  12. present: The mahogany notice gives the incident date of July 4, 2025 and a time of approximately 11 pm.
  13. present: It gives the incident date July 4, 2025, the time approximately 11 pm, and a report time of 12:24 am on July 5, so the oak time element is present.
  14. present: The poplar text gives July 4, 2025 and approximately 11 p.m. as the incident date and time.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the text gives July 4, 2025 at approximately 11 pm and a report time on July 5, 2025.
  16. present: The sequoia review marks time present because it states July 4, 2025, approximately 11 p.m., and a July 5 report time.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds time because the alert gives July 4, 2025, about 11 p.m., and the report time of July 5, 2025.
  18. present: The tupelo alert gives the incident date July 4, 2025 and the time approximately 11 p.m.
  19. present: The walnut text gives the incident date July 4, 2025 and the time of about 11 p.m.
  20. present: The acorn review marks time present because it states July 4, 2025, about 11 p.m., and a report at 12:24 a.m.
  21. present: The beech notice gives July 4, 2025, about 11 p.m., and a July 5 report time.
  22. present: The cottonwood text gives July 4, 2025 and approximately 11 p.m. as the incident date and time.
  23. present: The hickory text gives July 4, 2025 and approximately 11 p.m. as when the incident occurred.
  24. present: The sycamore alert states the incident date July 4, 2025, the time about 11 p.m., and the report time the next morning.
  25. present: It gives the incident date July 4, 2025 and the time approximately 11 p.m., so teak timing is present.
• Impactpresent19/25

  Final assessment

  19 of 25 passes marked Impact present and 6 absent. The alder text says these actions make the campus less safe and refers to an ongoing threat to health or safety.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alder text says these actions make the campus less safe and refers to an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  2. present: The basswood review finds impact because the victim was sexually assaulted and the text calls this a threat to health or safety.
  3. present: The cypress message says the crime makes campus less safe and names an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  4. absent: The dogwood alert names rape but states no separate consequence or severity such as injury, danger, or death.
  5. present: An elder can see harm to a person because the text states that the driver sexually assaulted the student.
  6. present: The fir message says the perpetrators' actions make campus less safe and cites a threat to health or safety.
  7. present: The ginkgo message says perpetrators make campus less safe and refers to an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  8. present: The hemlock text states that a student was sexually assaulted, that such actions make campus less safe, and that health or safety is threatened.
  9. absent: The ironwood reading finds no impact because rape names the hazard, and no consequence such as injury or danger is stated.
  10. absent: The junco reading finds no statement of consequence or severity beyond the crime name and generic campus safety boilerplate.
  11. present: The larch text says these actions make campus less safe and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  12. present: The mahogany wording says the perpetrators make campus less safe and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  13. present: It says the perpetrators' actions make our campus less safe and refers to a threat to the health or safety of students or employees, so the oak impact element is present.
  14. present: The poplar message says the perpetrators make campus less safe and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  15. present: In this redwood pass, the text says the crime makes campus less safe and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  16. absent: The sequoia review marks impact absent because the assault wording only restates the rape and states no separate consequence or severity.
  17. present: The tamarack review finds impact because the alert says these actions make campus less safe and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  18. absent: The tupelo text names rape but does not add a consequence or severity such as injury or danger.
  19. present: The walnut wording states a sexual assault occurred and calls the case an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  20. present: The acorn review marks impact present because it says the crime makes campus less safe and threatens health or safety.
  21. present: The beech wording says the victim was sexually assaulted and cites an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  22. present: The cottonwood message says the crime makes campus less safe and is an ongoing threat to health or safety.
  23. present: The hickory alert says the assault makes campus less safe and that there is a threat to health or safety.
  24. present: The sycamore wording says these actions make campus less safe and that the alert concerns a threat to health or safety.
  25. absent: Naming the assault and a generic line about campus being less safe states no separate consequence or severity such as dangerous or injury in this teak text.