Battery outside 754 South Wabash, police report pending

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree Columbia College Chicago names itself and named agencies appear where present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The opening addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community by name.
  2. present: Columbia College Chicago addresses its community, and Campus Security and the Chicago Police Department are named agencies.
  3. present: Columbia College Chicago is named as the audience while Campus Security and Chicago Police Department detectives are listed agencies.
  4. present: Columbia College Chicago is named up front, with Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives listed as contacts.
  5. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and lists Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department Detectives as agencies.
  6. present: The greeting names Columbia College Chicago, and Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department Detectives appear as agencies.
  7. present: Columbia College Chicago is addressed by name, with Campus Security and Chicago Police Department also listed.
  8. present: The community line names Columbia College Chicago while Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives are listed as contacts.
  9. present: The college names itself in the salutation and lists Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department detectives.
  10. present: Columbia College Chicago addresses its community, and Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department Detectives are named.
  11. present: The header addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community, with Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives named.
  12. present: Columbia College Chicago presents itself as the author of the crime advisory.
  13. present: The college names its community while Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives appear by name.
  14. present: The college identifies its community in the greeting, and Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department detectives are named agencies.
  15. present: The notice addresses the Columbia College Chicago community and names Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department detectives.
  16. present: Columbia College Chicago is named up front, with Campus Security and Chicago Police Department detectives listed as contacts.
  17. present: The heading addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and later names Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives.
  18. present: Columbia College Chicago identifies its audience while Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives are named.
  19. present: Columbia College Chicago identifies itself and CPD detectives are named as a contact agency.
  20. present: The college names its community, and Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department Detectives appear as agencies.
  21. present: The college identifies itself in the community address, and Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department Detectives are named agencies.
  22. present: Columbia College Chicago identifies its community as the audience, and Campus Security plus Chicago Police Department Detectives are named.
  23. present: Columbia College Chicago labels its audience, and Campus Security and Chicago Police Department detectives are named.
  24. present: The college names itself up front and later lists Campus Security and Chicago Police Department Detectives.
  25. present: The college names itself in the salutation, and Chicago Police Department detectives are listed as a contact.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The advisory states that an offender battered a victim.
  2. present: An offender battering a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  3. present: An offender battering a victim names battery as the specific crime.
  4. present: The sentence that an offender battered a victim names battery as the threat.
  5. present: The line that an offender battered a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  6. present: An offender battering a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  7. present: The advisory states that an offender battered a victim, naming battery as the hazard.
  8. present: The text says an offender battered a victim, which names battery as the specific threat.
  9. present: The text states that an offender battered a victim, which is a specific violent crime.
  10. present: The advisory reports that an offender battered a victim, a specific battery threat.
  11. present: The text states that an offender battered a victim, which is a specific battery crime.
  12. present: The text states that an offender battered a victim, naming battery as the hazard.
  13. present: Battery is named outright when the text says an offender battered a victim.
  14. present: Battery is named outright when the text says an offender battered a victim.
  15. present: An offender battering a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  16. present: The text states that an offender battered a victim, naming battery as the hazard.
  17. present: The advisory states that an offender battered a victim, which is a specific crime.
  18. present: The sentence that an offender battered a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  19. present: The text states outright that an offender battered a victim.
  20. present: The sentence that an offender battered a victim names battery as the threat.
  21. present: The line that an offender battered a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  22. present: The sentence that an offender battered a victim names battery as the hazard.
  23. present: The line that an offender battered a victim names battery as the specific threat.
  24. present: An offender battering a victim is an explicit battery, which is a specific violent threat.
  25. present: The text states that an offender battered a victim, a specific battery.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The battery is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  2. present: The event is placed outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a numbered street address.
  3. present: The attack is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a numbered street address.
  4. present: The scene is outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  5. present: The scene is given as outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  6. present: The incident is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  7. present: The incident is located outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  8. present: The incident is placed outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  9. present: The incident is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  10. present: The scene is placed outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a numbered street address.
  11. present: The incident is located outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  12. present: The event is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a specific street address.
  13. present: 754 South Wabash Avenue is a specific street address for the scene.
  14. present: The incident is placed outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a full street address.
  15. present: The scene is given as outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  16. present: The battery is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  17. present: The battery occurred outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  18. present: The battering is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  19. present: The location is given as outside 754 South Wabash Avenue.
  20. present: The scene is given as outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  21. present: The event is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  22. present: 754 South Wabash Avenue is a street address for where the incident occurred.
  23. present: The scene is outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  24. present: The incident is sited outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a numbered street address.
  25. present: The incident is placed outside 754 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is absent.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Contact numbers for tips are listed, but no protective action is directed.
  2. absent: Readers are told only to phone Campus Security and detectives with information, not how to protect themselves.
  3. absent: The closing only invites extra details for Campus Security and detectives rather than instructing any protective step.
  4. absent: Phoning security or detectives with extra details is not an instruction to lock doors, avoid an area, or otherwise stay safe.
  5. absent: Phone numbers for anyone with additional information are a tips plea, not a protective instruction.
  6. absent: Asking people with additional information to call investigators solicits tips rather than telling readers how to stay safe.
  7. absent: The closing only solicits tips via phone numbers and gives no protective steps.
  8. absent: The closing only invites extra information by phone and does not direct any protective step.
  9. absent: The closing merely solicits tips at two phone numbers and gives no protective steps.
  10. absent: Readers are only asked to share extra information with investigators, not how to protect themselves.
  11. absent: The footer only routes extra information to Campus Security and detectives instead of telling readers how to stay safe.
  12. absent: Phone numbers for follow-up tips appear, but no instruction tells readers how to protect themselves.
  13. absent: Readers are only asked to pass along information, with no lock-up, avoid, or other protective step.
  14. absent: The final paragraph only solicits additional information by phone and gives no protective steps.
  15. absent: Asking anyone with details to call security or detectives is a request for information, not guidance on staying safe.
  16. absent: The only ask is to share additional information with investigators, not a protective step.
  17. absent: The only instruction is to contact Campus Security or detectives with extra information.
  18. absent: The footer only collects additional information by phone, which is not a safety instruction.
  19. absent: The closing line only solicits tips for campus security and detectives.
  20. absent: Recipients are only told to pass extra information to investigators, not how to protect themselves.
  21. absent: The footer only solicits extra information at two phone numbers and gives no stay-safe instruction.
  22. absent: Contact numbers for Campus Security and detectives solicit tips instead of telling recipients how to protect themselves.
  23. absent: The closing only routes extra information to security and detectives, a witness appeal rather than guidance.
  24. absent: Call numbers for investigators solicit information only and never tell readers how to stay safe.
  25. absent: The only instruction is to share extra details with Campus Security or detectives.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The event is timed to July 31 at about 11:55 p.m.
  2. present: The offense is assigned to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  3. present: The battery is placed on July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m., and the notice is dated August 1, 2025.
  4. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. supplies a date and a clock time.
  5. present: The battery occurred on July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  6. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. supplies both a date and a clock time.
  7. present: The event is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  8. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. gives both a date and a clock time for the battery.
  9. present: The event is timed on July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  10. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. gives both a calendar day and a clock time.
  11. present: The battery is timestamped July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  12. present: The incident is placed on July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  13. present: The offense is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  14. present: The event is clocked on July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  15. present: The battery is dated July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  16. present: The event is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  17. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. gives both a date and a clock time.
  18. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. supplies the date and clock time.
  19. present: The event is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  20. present: The battering is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  21. present: The battering is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  22. present: The event is timed to July 31 at about 11:55 p.m., with the notice dated August 1, 2025.
  23. present: The battery is timed to July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
  24. present: July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m. gives both a date and a clock time.
  25. present: The battery occurred on July 31 at approximately 11:55 p.m.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree this element is present.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Battery of a victim is a stated consequence of the crime.
  2. present: Battering a victim states that physical harm was inflicted.
  3. present: Battering the victim reports that physical violence was inflicted.
  4. present: Battering a victim states that physical force was applied and the person was harmed.
  5. present: Battering the victim reports physical harm as a consequence of the attack.
  6. present: Battering the victim reports physical harm as a consequence of the attack.
  7. present: Battery indicates the victim was physically struck, a stated consequence of the crime.
  8. present: Battering a victim reports realized physical harm as the outcome of the incident.
  9. present: Battery of the victim reports physical harm as a realized outcome.
  10. present: Battering a victim states realized physical harm as a consequence of the incident.
  11. present: Battering a victim records physical harm as a consequence of the attack.
  12. present: Battery of a victim is a direct statement of physical harm and gravity.
  13. present: Being battered states physical harm beyond merely naming a vague incident.
  14. present: A victim being battered states that physical harm actually took place.
  15. present: Battering the victim states physical force and harm as a consequence.
  16. present: Battering the victim reports physical harm as a consequence of the crime.
  17. present: Battery of a victim reports actual physical harm as a consequence.
  18. present: Battering a victim states that physical force and harm actually occurred.
  19. present: Battery of a victim reports that physical harm took place.
  20. present: Battering a victim states that physical violence was inflicted as a realized outcome.
  21. present: Battery of a victim states realized physical harm as the outcome of the crime.
  22. present: Battery against a victim conveys realized physical harm, not merely an unlabeled disturbance.
  23. present: Battering a victim reports realized physical harm.
  24. present: Reporting that a victim was battered records physical harm as the outcome.
  25. present: Battering the victim reports physical harm as the outcome of the incident.