Random punches on the sidewalk at 828 South Wabash

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree the college names itself and police/Campus Security are named agencies.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names the Chicago Police Department as the investigating agency.
  2. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  3. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself addressing the community and Chicago Police Department is the investigating agency.
  4. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names the Chicago Police Department.
  5. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  6. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department is a named agency.
  7. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department is identified as the investigating agency.
  8. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  9. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and cites the Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  10. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and the Chicago Police Department is identified as the investigating agency.
  11. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names the Chicago Police Department.
  12. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  13. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself in the greeting and the Chicago Police Department is identified as the investigating agency.
  14. present: The header names Columbia College Chicago and the Chicago Police Department is identified as the investigating agency.
  15. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself, and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  16. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security appear as agencies.
  17. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  18. present: The message addresses the Columbia College Chicago Community and names Chicago Police Department and Campus Security.
  19. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  20. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  21. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  22. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself in the greeting and the Chicago Police Department is a named investigating agency.
  23. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself as the sender, and the Chicago Police Department is a named agency.
  24. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
  25. present: Columbia College Chicago names itself, and Chicago Police Department and Campus Security are named agencies.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree punching the victim in the arm and chest names a specific assault.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, which is a specific act.
  2. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  3. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, naming a specific assault.
  5. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  6. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  7. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest names a specific assault.
  8. present: The offender punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  9. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, naming a specific assault.
  10. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, which is a specific assault.
  11. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, naming a specific assault.
  12. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest is a specific assault, not a generic incident.
  13. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest names a specific assault.
  14. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, which is a specific assault.
  15. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, which is a specific assault.
  17. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest is a specific assault threat.
  18. present: The offender punching the victim in the arm and chest is a specific assault rather than a generic incident.
  19. present: Punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
  20. present: The offender randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest is a specific assault, not a generic incident.
  21. present: The offender randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest names a specific assault.
  22. present: Randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest names a specific assault.
  23. present: The offender randomly punched the victim in the arm and chest, a specific assault rather than a generic incident.
  24. present: The offender punching the victim in the arm and chest is a specific assault rather than a generic incident.
  25. present: The offender randomly punching the victim in the arm and chest specifies an assault rather than a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree 828 South Wabash Avenue is a location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The alert names 828 South Wabash Avenue as the location.
  2. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  3. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  4. present: The alert locates the incident near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  5. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  6. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  7. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  8. present: The incident occurred near 828 South Wabash Avenue, a street address.
  9. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  10. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  11. present: The incident occurred near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  12. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  13. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  14. present: The alert names 828 South Wabash Avenue as the location.
  15. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  16. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  17. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  18. present: The incident is located near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  19. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  20. present: The incident is located near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  21. present: The incident is located near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  22. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  23. present: The alert places the incident near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  24. present: The incident is placed near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
  25. present: The incident occurred near 828 South Wabash Avenue.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find only a request for tips, which is not protective guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Recipients are only asked to share tips with Campus Security and detectives, which is not protective guidance.
  2. absent: Contacting Campus Security and detectives with tips is not a protective action for recipients.
  3. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  4. absent: Recipients are only asked to share information with Campus Security and detectives, which is not protective guidance.
  5. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  6. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  7. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  8. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  9. absent: Recipients are only asked to share tips with Campus Security and police, which is not protective guidance.
  10. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  11. absent: Recipients are only asked to contact Campus Security and detectives with information, which is not protective guidance.
  12. absent: The only recipient ask is to contact Campus Security and detectives with tips, which is not protective action.
  13. absent: The text only asks people with information to contact Campus Security and detectives, which is not protective guidance.
  14. absent: Recipients are only asked to contact Campus Security and detectives with information, and tips requests are not guidance.
  15. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  16. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and Chicago Police is a request for tips, not protective guidance.
  17. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tip request, not protective action.
  18. absent: Recipients are only asked to contact Campus Security and detectives with information, which is not protective guidance.
  19. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  20. absent: Asking anyone with additional information to contact Campus Security or detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  21. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  22. absent: Asking anyone with information to contact Campus Security and detectives is a tips request, not protective action.
  23. absent: The only ask is to contact Campus Security and detectives with tips, which is not protective guidance.
  24. absent: Recipients are only asked to share information with Campus Security and detectives, not given protective actions.
  25. absent: The only ask is that anyone with information contact Campus Security and detectives, not a protective action.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m. is a time cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026, at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  2. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  3. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026, at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  4. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  5. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  6. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026, at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  7. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  8. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  9. present: The alert gives March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m. as the incident time.
  10. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  11. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  12. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  13. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  14. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  15. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  16. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  17. present: The alert gives the date March 4, 2026 and the clock time of approximately 3:25 p.m.
  18. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  19. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  20. present: The alert dates the incident March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  21. present: The incident is dated March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  22. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  23. present: The event is dated March 4, 2026, at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  24. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026, at approximately 3:25 p.m.
  25. present: The incident occurred on March 4, 2026 at approximately 3:25 p.m.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  A majority find no stated consequence beyond naming the punches.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not state consequences or severity.
  2. absent: Naming the punch alone does not state injury, severity, or other consequences.
  3. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest states the assault itself without consequences or severity.
  4. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest describes the act without stating injury, consequences, or severity.
  5. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not state injury, severity, or other consequences.
  6. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not state injury, severity, or other consequences.
  7. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not state extra injury, consequences, or severity.
  8. absent: Naming the punch itself states the hazard and does not add injury, consequences, or severity.
  9. absent: The punch is the named hazard and no injury, disruption, or other consequence is stated.
  10. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest describes the act without stating consequences or severity.
  11. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest states the act but does not describe consequences or severity.
  12. absent: Naming the punch to the arm and chest does not state injury, severity, or other consequences.
  13. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not add injury, consequences, or severity beyond the act.
  14. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest describes the act without stating consequences or severity.
  15. absent: Naming the punch describes the assault itself with no injury, severity, or other consequence stated.
  16. absent: Naming the punch itself states the hazard and does not convey further consequences or severity.
  17. absent: Naming the punch itself does not add injury, consequences, or severity beyond the assault.
  18. absent: Naming the punch is the hazard itself, with no added consequence or severity stated.
  19. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest states the hazard only, with no extra consequence or severity.
  20. absent: Naming the punch is the hazard itself and no extra injury, severity, or other consequence is stated.
  21. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not state injury, severity, or other consequences.
  22. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest does not state injury, consequences, or severity.
  23. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest describes the act but does not state consequences or severity beyond the punch itself.
  24. absent: Naming a punch to the arm and chest states the assault itself without extra severity or consequence.
  25. absent: Naming the punch alone does not state injury, severity, or other consequence.