Boil water advisory for McGregor Hall and Weaver

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Source present. EKU Critical Boil Water Alert is a branded signature that identifies the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: EKU Critical Boil Water Alert is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  2. present: It opens with the branded sender tag EKU Critical Boil Water Alert.
  3. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  4. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert".
  5. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature identifying the sender.
  6. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  7. present: The message opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert".
  8. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  9. present: EKU Critical Boil Water Alert is a branded signature that identifies EKU as the sender.
  10. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature naming the university.
  11. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature identifying the sender.
  12. present: The message opens with the branded signature EKU Critical Boil Water Alert.
  13. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert", identifying the sender.
  14. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature identifying the sender.
  15. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature naming the university.
  16. present: The branded opening EKU Critical Boil Water Alert identifies the sending institution.
  17. present: The branded signature "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" identifies the sender.
  18. present: The branded opening EKU Critical Boil Water Alert identifies the sender.
  19. present: EKU Critical Boil Water Alert is a branded signature identifying the sender.
  20. present: EKU Critical Boil Water Alert is a branded signature identifying EKU as the sender.
  21. present: It opens with the branded signature "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert."
  22. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature identifying the sender.
  23. present: It opens with the branded signature EKU Critical Boil Water Alert.
  24. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature that identifies the sender.
  25. present: "EKU Critical Boil Water Alert" is a branded signature that names the university sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Hazard present. A boil water advisory names a specific water safety hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: A boil water advisory names a specific water safety hazard.
  2. present: It names a boil water advisory, which is a specific hazard.
  3. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific public health hazard.
  4. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water safety hazard.
  5. present: It names a boil water advisory, a specific hazard rather than a generic emergency.
  6. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water threat rather than a generic situation.
  7. present: It names a "boil water advisory", a specific hazard.
  8. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water safety hazard.
  9. present: It names a boil water advisory, a specific public health threat.
  10. present: "boil water advisory" names a specific water hazard rather than a generic incident.
  11. present: A "boil water advisory" names the specific hazard affecting the water.
  12. present: It names a boil water advisory, a specific hazard, not a generic emergency.
  13. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific hazard involving the water supply.
  14. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water safety threat.
  15. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific water hazard rather than a generic incident.
  16. present: A boil water advisory is a specific water threat, not a generic emergency or incident.
  17. present: A "boil water advisory" names the specific water hazard.
  18. present: A boil water advisory names a specific water safety hazard.
  19. present: A boil water advisory names a specific water hazard.
  20. present: A boil water advisory names a specific hazard involving the water supply.
  21. present: It names a "boil water advisory" as the specific threat.
  22. present: It names a "boil water advisory" as the specific hazard.
  23. present: It names a boil water advisory, a specific threat.
  24. present: A "boil water advisory" names a specific drinking water hazard.
  25. present: It states there is a "boil water advisory", a specific health hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Location present. It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  2. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building as the affected places.
  3. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building as the affected places.
  4. present: It limits the advisory to "McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building".
  5. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  6. present: It names "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building" as the affected places.
  7. present: It names the places "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building".
  8. present: It names "McGregor Hall" and the "Weaver Building" as the affected places.
  9. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building as the affected places.
  10. present: It applies the advisory to "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building".
  11. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  12. present: It limits the advisory to McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  13. present: It names "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building" as the affected places.
  14. present: It names the affected places, "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building".
  15. present: It names the affected places: "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building".
  16. present: It limits the advisory to McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  17. present: It names "McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building" as the affected places.
  18. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  19. present: McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building are the stated locations.
  20. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  21. present: It names "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building" as the affected places.
  22. present: It names the affected places as "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building".
  23. present: It applies the advisory to McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building.
  24. present: It names the places "McGregor Hall" and "the Weaver Building".
  25. present: It names McGregor Hall and the Weaver Building as the places affected.
• Guidancepresent21/25

  Final assessment

  21 of 25 passes marked Guidance present and 4 marked it absent. It names the boil water action and instructs readers to please see the email for information.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names the boil water action and instructs readers to please see the email for information.
  2. present: Please see email for information tells recipients to check email for what to do next.
  3. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to check email, like monitoring for updates.
  4. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to check email for what to do.
  5. present: Calling it a boil water advisory tells recipients the protective step is to boil the water.
  6. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to check the email for further direction.
  7. present: It tells recipients "Please see email for information", directing them to the update on what to do.
  8. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to consult the email for what to do.
  9. present: Boil water advisory states the protective action to boil water, and Please see email for information directs recipients to details.
  10. present: "Please see email for information" tells recipients to check the email for instructions.
  11. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to check that email.
  12. absent: Please see email for information points elsewhere and does not state a protective action such as boiling water.
  13. present: "Boil water" states the protective action, and "Please see email for information" directs recipients.
  14. present: The advisory tells people to boil water, and "Please see email for information" directs them to read on.
  15. absent: "Please see email for information" does not itself tell recipients to boil water or take another protective step.
  16. present: Please see email for information instructs recipients to check the email for what to do.
  17. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to consult the email for what they should do.
  18. present: The boil water advisory tells people to boil water, and it directs them to see the email.
  19. absent: Please see email only points to another message and does not instruct a protective action such as boiling water.
  20. present: Please see email for information tells recipients to check the email for instructions.
  21. present: "Please see email for information" tells recipients to check the email for instructions.
  22. present: "Please see email for information" instructs recipients to check the email for what to do.
  23. present: Please see email for information instructs recipients, and boil water names the protective step.
  24. present: It instructs recipients to "Please see email for information", directing them to further instructions.
  25. absent: The line "Please see email for information" only points elsewhere and does not tell recipients to boil water or take another protective step.
• Timeabsent10/25

  Final assessment

  10 of 25 passes marked Time present and 15 marked it absent. "in effect" is not a clock time, date, or explicit recency cue such as "now" or "ongoing".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The phrase in effect says the advisory is current.
  2. present: Saying the advisory is in effect marks it as current.
  3. present: "in effect" states that the advisory is currently active.
  4. absent: "in effect" is not a clock time, date, or explicit recency cue such as "now" or "ongoing".
  5. present: The words "in effect" mark the advisory as current.
  6. absent: It says the advisory is "in effect" but gives no clock time, date, or cue such as "now" or "today".
  7. present: The phrase "in effect" conveys that the advisory is current.
  8. absent: "In effect" is not a clock time, date, or listed recency cue such as "now" or "until further notice".
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears.
  10. present: The phrase "in effect" marks the advisory as currently active.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as "now" or "today" appears.
  12. absent: The phrase in effect does not give a clock time, date, or a recency cue such as now or today.
  13. absent: "In effect" only marks status, with no clock time, date, or recency word such as now.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or cue such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" is given.
  15. absent: "in effect" does not give a clock time, date, or a recency cue such as "now" or "today".
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, today, or ongoing appears, and in effect is only a status phrase.
  17. present: "in effect" conveys that the advisory is current rather than past or future only.
  18. present: The phrase in effect conveys that the advisory is currently active.
  19. absent: In effect does not give a clock time, date, or a recency cue such as now or ongoing.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or cue such as now, today, ongoing, or until further notice appears.
  21. absent: The phrase "in effect" says the advisory applies, but it is not a clock time, date, or cue such as "now" or "ongoing."
  22. present: "in effect" states that the advisory is currently active, which is a recency cue.
  23. present: The phrase in effect says the advisory is currently in force.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or word such as "now", "today", or "ongoing" appears.
  25. absent: The phrase "in effect" marks status only and is not a clock time, date, or word such as now or ongoing.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked Impact absent. It does not state illness, contamination, or any other consequence beyond naming the advisory.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It does not state illness, contamination, or any other consequence beyond naming the advisory.
  2. absent: It does not state contamination, illness, or any other consequence of the water.
  3. absent: The advisory is named, but the text never says the water is unsafe or could cause illness.
  4. absent: It names the advisory but does not state illness, contamination, or other harm.
  5. absent: It does not state illness, contamination, or any other consequence or severity.
  6. absent: It names the advisory but never says the water is unsafe or could cause illness.
  7. absent: It does not state contamination, illness, or any other consequence or severity.
  8. absent: Naming the boil water advisory does not by itself state illness, contamination, or other consequences.
  9. absent: The advisory is named, but the text never states illness, danger, or another consequence.
  10. absent: It does not state illness, contamination, or any other harm from the water.
  11. absent: It does not mention contamination, illness, or any consequence beyond the advisory name.
  12. absent: It does not state a consequence such as illness beyond the advisory name.
  13. absent: It does not say the water is unsafe or that drinking it could cause illness.
  14. absent: It does not state that the water could cause illness or is otherwise dangerous.
  15. absent: It does not mention illness, contamination, or any other consequence of the water.
  16. absent: It does not say the water could make people sick or state any other consequence or severity.
  17. absent: It does not state illness, contamination, or any other consequence of the water beyond naming the advisory.
  18. absent: It never states contamination, illness, or any other consequence or severity.
  19. absent: Critical is only part of the alert name, and no illness, contamination, or other harm is stated.
  20. absent: It does not state contamination, illness, or any other consequence of the advisory.
  21. absent: It does not state contamination, illness, or any other consequence of the water.
  22. absent: It does not mention illness, contamination, or any other consequence of the water.
  23. absent: It does not state illness, contamination, or any other consequence beyond the advisory name.
  24. absent: It never states illness or contamination, and "Critical" is only part of the alert name.
  25. absent: It does not say the water is unsafe or could cause illness, so the advisory name alone is not impact.