Dangerous situation near 10th and Walnut Grove

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No campus brand, agency name, or alert signature appears in the text.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No campus brand, agency name, or alert signature appears in the text.
  2. absent: The wording never says who is sending the notice.
  3. absent: Source is absent: no university, police, or alert-system label is stated.
  4. absent: Nothing identifies an issuing authority or branded channel.
  5. absent: No sender tag or institutional self-naming is present.
  6. absent: Recipients cannot tell the source from the body alone.
  7. absent: Source codes zero because authority language is missing.
  8. absent: There is no ALERT brand or school name to credit as source.
  9. absent: The message jumps to content without naming who issued it.
  10. absent: No public-safety or campus office is identified as sender.
  11. absent: Source fails: blank on branded signature and agency.
  12. absent: Issuing body is not stated in any form.
  13. absent: Without a signature or school name, source is absent.
  14. absent: The text omits sender identification entirely.
  15. absent: No authority cue meets the source element rule.
  16. absent: Source not present under the branding or agency tests.
  17. absent: Who authored the alert is left unspecified.
  18. absent: There is no institutional label to treat as source.
  19. absent: Sender identity cannot be read from the message.
  20. absent: Source scores absent on this wording.
  21. absent: No alert header or campus self-reference is included.
  22. absent: The body never attributes the notice to an issuer.
  23. absent: Authority line is missing from start to end.
  24. absent: Source element fails for lack of named sender.
  25. absent: Nothing in the text names a sending organization.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  12. present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  15. present: Named condition "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  19. present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given through "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  2. present: Place is specified as "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  3. present: Where is answered by "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  4. present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" functions as the location element.
  5. present: The alert situates the event with "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  6. present: Geographic or campus place: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  7. present: L=1 because "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" names where this applies.
  8. present: Recipients are told the place via "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  9. present: Location present in the phrase "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  10. present: A campus or building reference "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" covers location.
  11. present: The where cue is "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  12. present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" identifies the affected area.
  13. present: Place naming succeeds with "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  14. present: Location codes yes on "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  15. present: Site detail appears as "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  16. present: The message anchors place with "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  17. present: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" is enough location under the rubric.
  18. present: Affected place language: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  19. present: L is present via "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  20. present: Campus geography is marked by "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  21. present: Where this matters is "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  22. present: The text localizes to "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  23. present: Location element met by "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  24. present: Place is not left blank: "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…".
  25. present: Spatial reference "IUB emergency: a dangerous situation is…" supports L=1.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No protective action or operational instruction is given to recipients.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No protective action or operational instruction is given to recipients.
  2. absent: Guidance is absent: the text does not tell people what to do.
  3. absent: There is no shelter, avoid, evacuate, remote, or similar directive.
  4. absent: G=0 because audience-facing instructions are missing.
  5. absent: The message reports status without directing action.
  6. absent: No what-to-do language appears.
  7. absent: Guidance fails: pure information without orders.
  8. absent: Recipients are not told a protective step.
  9. absent: Instructional content is not present.
  10. absent: The alert omits guidance to the public.
  11. absent: Without a directive, G is zero.
  12. absent: No action line is addressed to readers.
  13. absent: Guidance element codes absent.
  14. absent: What-to-do is left unstated.
  15. absent: The text does not instruct avoidance, shelter, or closure behavior.
  16. absent: Audience guidance is missing from the body.
  17. absent: G fails the protective-action test.
  18. absent: No operational instruction is issued.
  19. absent: Readers get facts but not orders.
  20. absent: Guidance not established here.
  21. absent: Directive language is absent.
  22. absent: The message never tells recipients how to act.
  23. absent: No shelter/evacuate/remote/close instruction appears.
  24. absent: G is absent on non-directive wording.
  25. absent: Protective guidance cannot be coded present.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today appears.
  2. absent: Time is absent from the alert text.
  3. absent: Nothing tells recipients when this applies.
  4. absent: T=0 because temporal cues are missing.
  5. absent: No day, hour, or immediate language is stated.
  6. absent: The message omits timing entirely.
  7. absent: Time element fails on this wording.
  8. absent: When is left unspecified.
  9. absent: No calendar or clock reference is present.
  10. absent: Temporal information cannot be found.
  11. absent: Without a time cue, T is zero.
  12. absent: The alert is silent on schedule.
  13. absent: Time codes absent here.
  14. absent: Recency language is missing.
  15. absent: T fails the when test.
  16. absent: No today/now/clock marker appears.
  17. absent: Timing is not established by the text.
  18. absent: Date and hour are both omitted.
  19. absent: Temporal element is not satisfied.
  20. absent: The body lacks any when cue.
  21. absent: Time not present under the rubric.
  22. absent: Schedule detail is blank.
  23. absent: No temporal anchor is given.
  24. absent: T is absent on timeless wording.
  25. absent: When-information is not included.
• Impactpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Impact is conveyed by "dangerous".

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Impact is conveyed by "dangerous".
  2. present: Consequence language appears as "dangerous".
  3. present: Severity or harm is signaled by "dangerous".
  4. present: "dangerous" states what the hazard does to people or operations.
  5. present: I=1 because "dangerous" implies real-world impact.
  6. present: The alert spells impact through "dangerous".
  7. present: Impact present: "dangerous".
  8. present: Operational or safety consequence "dangerous" is explicit.
  9. present: What could happen is framed as "dangerous".
  10. present: "dangerous" counts as impact beyond bare hazard naming.
  11. present: Impact element met by "dangerous".
  12. present: Severity cue "dangerous" supports I=1.
  13. present: I codes yes on "dangerous".
  14. present: The text links hazard to effect via "dangerous".
  15. present: Consequence wording: "dangerous".
  16. present: "dangerous" shows stakes for the campus community.
  17. present: Impact is not left implicit only: "dangerous".
  18. present: Harm or closure effect appears as "dangerous".
  19. present: I is present via "dangerous".
  20. present: The message states impact with "dangerous".
  21. present: Real-world effect language "dangerous" is included.
  22. present: Impact signal: "dangerous".
  23. present: "dangerous" communicates severity or disruption.
  24. present: Consequence is clear from "dangerous".
  25. present: Impact present through the phrase "dangerous".