Burglary near the 3rd floor of N52, located at 26 reported to campus community burglary n5

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: it is issued by "Sergeant David J. O’Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police" with a Cambridge address and phone number.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is listed as the issuing officer.
  2. present: The signature block naming Sergeant David J. O'Connor, MIT Police, identifies the source.
  3. present: The notice is issued by "Sergeant David J. O'Connor" of the MIT Police, with contact information.
  4. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police Department signs the notice.
  5. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is listed with unit, address and phone.
  6. present: Signed by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the "MIT Police", the issuing authority.
  7. present: Signed by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police, identifying the issuing unit.
  8. present: Signed "Sergeant David J. O'Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police".
  9. present: Signed by Sergeant David J. O'Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police.
  10. present: MIT Police are investigating and Sergeant David J. O'Connor issues the notification.
  11. present: The MIT Police Department is named and Sergeant David J. O'Connor signs the closing block.
  12. present: Signed by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police with a department address.
  13. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is listed as issuing this notice.
  14. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is listed as issuing the message.
  15. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is named at the close as issuer.
  16. present: Issued by "Sergeant David J. O'Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police".
  17. present: The closing identifies "Sergeant David J. O'Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police".
  18. present: Signed by "Sergeant David J. O'Connor ... MIT Police", identifying the sender.
  19. present: Issued by Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police with department address.
  20. present: The closing block "Sergeant David J. O'Connor ... MIT Police" names the issuing officer.
  21. present: Signed "Sergeant David J. O'Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police."
  22. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police signs this notice.
  23. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is listed as the issuing officer.
  24. present: Signed by "Sergeant David J. O'Connor, Crime Prevention/Community Policing Unit, MIT Police".
  25. present: Sergeant David J. O'Connor of the MIT Police is named as the issuing officer.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: an office "was burglarized", someone "removed two desktop computers", and the notice adds "There are no signs of forced entry".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: An office "was burglarized", with security cables cut and a camera lens painted over.
  2. present: An office "was burglarized", with security cables cut and two desktop computers removed.
  3. present: An office "was burglarized", with two desktop computers removed and security cables cut.
  4. present: An office "was burglarized" with security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted.
  5. present: An office "was burglarized", with cut security cables and two desktop computers removed.
  6. present: An office "was burglarized" with security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted.
  7. present: An office "was burglarized", with security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted.
  8. present: It reports an office "was burglarized" with security cables cut and a camera disabled.
  9. present: An office "was burglarized", with security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted.
  10. present: An office burglary in which security cables were cut and a camera lens painted over is named.
  11. present: An office "was burglarized", with two desktop computers taken and security cables cut.
  12. present: An office "was burglarized" with security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted.
  13. present: An office "was burglarized", with cut security cables indicating a deliberate break in.
  14. present: An office "was burglarized" with computers taken, cables cut, and a camera lens spray painted.
  15. present: An office "was burglarized" with computers removed and cables cut, a specific crime.
  16. present: It reports an office "burglarized" with computers removed and security cables cut.
  17. present: An office "was burglarized", two desktops removed, security cables cut and a camera lens painted over.
  18. present: An office "was burglarized" with security cables cut and computers taken.
  19. present: An office "was burglarized" with computers taken and a security camera disabled.
  20. present: An office "was burglarized", security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted over.
  21. present: An office "was burglarized", two desktop computers removed and a camera lens spray painted over.
  22. present: An office "was burglarized" with computers taken and a camera disabled.
  23. present: An office "was burglarized" with two desktop computers removed and security cables cut.
  24. present: An office "was burglarized", with computers taken and security defeated.
  25. present: An office "was burglarized" with security cables cut, a specific crime.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the site is "an office on the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The location is "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  2. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue."
  3. present: It locates the office on "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  4. present: It names the 3rd floor of N52, "located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  5. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  6. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  7. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  8. present: The office is "on the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  9. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  10. present: N52, third floor, at 265 Massachusetts Avenue is specified.
  11. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  12. present: It names the 3rd floor of N52 "located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  13. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  14. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  15. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  16. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  17. present: The location is "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  18. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  19. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  20. present: Location is "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  21. present: The location is "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue."
  22. present: It names "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  23. present: It gives "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  24. present: It specifies "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
  25. present: The location is "the 3rd floor of N52, located at 265 Massachusetts Avenue".
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: readers are told "Always lock your office doors and windows", to lock up "even if only for a minute or two", to make sure the door closes tightly, and to report tailgaters.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It tells readers to lock office doors and windows and to report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  2. present: It instructs readers to lock office doors and windows and report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  3. present: It tells readers to lock office doors and windows and report suspicious people.
  4. present: Readers are told to lock office doors, keep locks working, and report tailgaters and suspicious people.
  5. present: Readers are told to lock office doors and windows and report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  6. present: Readers are told to lock office doors, close doors behind them, and report suspicious people.
  7. present: Readers are told to lock office doors, ensure doors close behind them, and report suspicious people.
  8. present: It tells readers to lock office doors, watch for tailgaters, and call MIT Police about crimes.
  9. present: Readers are told to lock office doors even briefly and to report suspicious people or tailgaters.
  10. present: Readers are instructed to lock office doors and windows, report suspicious people, and call MIT Police.
  11. present: Readers are told to lock office doors, ensure doors close tightly, and report suspicious activity.
  12. present: Readers are instructed to lock office doors, close them tightly, and report suspicious people.
  13. present: Recipients are instructed to lock office doors, close them tightly, and report suspicious people or tailgaters.
  14. present: It instructs recipients to lock office doors and report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  15. present: It instructs readers to lock office doors and report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  16. present: It instructs readers to lock office doors, close doors tightly, and report suspicious activity.
  17. present: It directs readers to lock office doors and windows and to report suspicious people.
  18. present: Readers are instructed to lock office doors, check doors close, and report suspicious people.
  19. present: It instructs readers to lock office doors and report suspicious people and tailgaters.
  20. present: It instructs readers to lock office doors, close doors behind them, and report tailgaters.
  21. present: It tells readers to lock office doors, close doors tightly behind them, and report suspicious people.
  22. present: Readers are told to lock office doors, close doors fully, and report suspicious activity.
  23. present: Recipients are told to lock office doors and windows and to report suspicious activity.
  24. present: It tells readers to lock office doors, report suspicious people, and notify MIT Police at once.
  25. present: Readers are told to lock office doors and windows, report tailgaters and call MIT Police immediately.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25: the window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The window spans "4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  2. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018."
  3. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  4. present: The window is "4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  5. present: The window spans "4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  6. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  7. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  8. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  9. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  10. present: The window is 4p.m. November 21, 2018 to 4p.m. November 24, 2018.
  11. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  12. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  13. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  14. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  15. present: The window "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018" is stated.
  16. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  17. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  18. present: It brackets "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  19. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  20. present: The span "4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018" is stated.
  21. present: The interval "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018" is given.
  22. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  23. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  24. present: The window runs "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
  25. present: The window is "between 4p.m. on November 21, 2018 and 4p.m. on November 24, 2018".
• Impactpresent16/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 16 of 25: loss and deliberate damage are stated, two desktops removed, "The security cables to both computers were cut", and a camera lens spray painted. Nine reads called that method, not consequence.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Damage and theft are stated: two desktop computers removed, cables cut, camera lens spray painted.
  2. absent: Cut cables and a painted-over camera lens are described without any statement of danger or severity.
  3. absent: Spray-painted cameras and cut cables are reported as facts, without any severity claim.
  4. present: Damage and theft are both stated: two desktops removed, cables cut and a camera lens painted over.
  5. absent: Spray-painting a camera shows method, not consequence; no severity or risk is stated.
  6. present: It conveys loss and deliberate damage: two desktops removed, cables cut, camera lens painted over.
  7. present: The damage is described: two desktop computers removed, security cables cut, camera lens painted over.
  8. present: Two desktop computers were removed, cables were cut and a camera lens was spray painted over.
  9. present: Loss and damage are stated: "removed two desktop computers", cut cables and a defaced camera.
  10. present: Two desktop computers were removed, cables cut and a camera disabled, showing planned damage and loss.
  11. absent: Spray-painted camera and cut cables are recounted without any statement of danger or severity.
  12. present: Two desktop computers were removed, cables were cut and a camera was disabled, real loss and damage.
  13. present: Two desktop computers were removed, security cables were cut, and a camera lens was spray painted over.
  14. absent: Deliberate tampering is described, but no harm or severity to people is stated.
  15. present: Two desktops taken, security cables cut and a camera lens spray painted show planned, serious loss.
  16. present: Damage and theft are described: two desktops removed, cables cut, camera lens spray painted.
  17. absent: Equipment loss and tampering are noted without any statement of danger to persons.
  18. present: It describes damage and loss: two desktops removed, cables cut, and a camera lens spray painted.
  19. present: Damage and loss are described: cut security cables, spray painted camera lens, two computers removed.
  20. absent: The planning shown by the suspect is noted but no consequence or danger is asserted.
  21. absent: The notice describes the theft method but states no consequence or severity for the community.
  22. present: Two desktops were removed, security cables cut, and a camera lens spray painted over.
  23. absent: Spray painting a camera lens is noted as a fact, without any severity or harm statement.
  24. present: Two desktops were removed, security cables were cut, and a camera lens was spray painted over.
  25. present: Two desktop computers were removed, cables cut and a camera lens spray painted, showing deliberate damage.