Weather-related delayed opening MU Alert notice

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The notice is issued in the university voice, "MU will delay opening until noon", which every read took as institutional attribution.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The message identifies MU, the university itself, as announcing the delay.
  2. present: "MU" names itself as the institution delaying its opening.
  3. present: "MU" names itself as the institution announcing the delay, which serves as the sender.
  4. present: "MU" announces the change itself, so the institution serves as the identified sender.
  5. present: The university identifies itself by announcing that "MU will delay opening".
  6. present: "MU" announces its own delayed opening, so the institution identifies itself as sender.
  7. present: The university names itself as the actor: "MU will delay opening until noon."
  8. present: The institution names itself: "MU will delay opening until noon".
  9. present: The notice speaks as the institution itself, announcing that "MU will delay opening".
  10. present: MU, the university itself, is the named speaker announcing its own delayed opening.
  11. present: The university names itself as the actor deciding that "MU will delay opening".
  12. present: The notice speaks as "MU", the university announcing its own delayed opening.
  13. present: "MU" naming itself as the institution announcing the delay identifies the sender.
  14. present: MU names itself as the institution delaying its opening, which identifies the sender.
  15. present: "MU" identifies itself as the institution announcing the delay.
  16. present: "MU" names itself as the institution delaying its opening, identifying the sender.
  17. present: "MU" names itself as the institution delaying its opening, which identifies the sender.
  18. present: The notice speaks in the university's own voice, "MU will delay opening".
  19. present: The university names itself as the actor: "MU will delay opening."
  20. present: "MU" names itself as the institution announcing the delay, identifying the sender.
  21. present: The university names itself as the actor, saying "MU will delay opening", which identifies the sender.
  22. present: The university names itself as the actor: "MU will delay opening".
  23. present: The university names itself in "MU will delay opening", identifying the institution as sender.
  24. present: "MU" names itself as the institution announcing the delay, which identifies the sender.
  25. present: "MU" announces its own delayed opening, so the institution identifies itself as sender.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. "Due to weather" is all the text offers, with no snow, ice or storm named, so no read found a stated hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Only the bare phrase "Due to weather" appears, which names no particular threat.
  2. absent: Only "Due to weather" is offered, which is too generic to identify the threat.
  3. absent: Only "Due to weather" is given, a generic cause with no specific hazard named.
  4. absent: "Due to weather" names no specific hazard such as snow, ice or storm.
  5. absent: Only the generic phrase "Due to weather" appears, with no specific threat named.
  6. absent: Only the generic phrase "Due to weather" appears, naming no specific weather threat.
  7. absent: Only "Due to weather" is given, which does not identify a specific threat.
  8. absent: "Due to weather" alone does not identify a specific threat such as ice or snow.
  9. absent: It attributes the delay only to "weather", which names no specific threat.
  10. absent: Only the generic phrase "Due to weather" appears, naming no particular threat.
  11. absent: "Due to weather" names no particular weather threat such as snow or ice.
  12. absent: It offers only "Due to weather" with no specific hazard such as ice, snow or storms.
  13. absent: Only the generic phrase "Due to weather" appears, with no specific hazard named.
  14. absent: Only "due to weather" appears, which does not specify what the weather threat actually is.
  15. absent: The cause is stated only as "weather", too generic to count as a named hazard.
  16. absent: Only the bare phrase "Due to weather" appears, with no specific hazard named.
  17. absent: The stated cause is only "Due to weather", a generic phrase that names no specific threat.
  18. absent: Only "Due to weather" is given, with no specific weather threat named.
  19. absent: Only the generic phrase "Due to weather" appears, with no specific hazard named.
  20. absent: Only the generic phrase "Due to weather" appears, with no specific threat named.
  21. absent: Only the bare phrase "Due to weather" appears, which does not name any specific threat.
  22. absent: "Due to weather" names no specific threat such as ice, snow or storm.
  23. absent: Only "Due to weather" is given, a generic cause that does not specify the threat.
  24. absent: The cause is stated only as "weather", too generic to count as a named hazard.
  25. absent: It cites only "weather" generically, naming no storm, ice or snow hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "MU" together with "hospital, vet clinics, campus dining" places the delayed opening at the Missouri campus and its facilities.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It refers to MU operations, that is the campus and its services.
  2. present: It addresses MU operations including the hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  3. present: It concerns MU operations, the hospital, vet clinics and campus dining, that is the campus.
  4. present: The delay applies to MU, its hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  5. present: It refers to MU, the campus, where hospital, vet clinics and dining continue.
  6. present: It concerns MU operations, including hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  7. present: The notice concerns MU, its hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  8. present: It concerns MU, its hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  9. present: It concerns MU operations, hospital, vet clinics and campus dining, identifying the campus.
  10. present: The place affected is MU, the campus, including hospital, vet clinics and dining.
  11. present: It applies to MU operations including the hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  12. present: It concerns the MU campus, referring to hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  13. present: The announcement applies to MU, the campus.
  14. present: It refers to MU and its campus services such as hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  15. present: The delayed opening applies to MU, the named campus.
  16. present: The message concerns MU, its hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  17. present: It refers to MU and its campus dining, identifying the campus as the place affected.
  18. present: It refers to the campus through hospital, vet clinics and campus dining operations.
  19. present: It refers to MU and its hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
  20. present: It refers to MU operations and campus dining, locating the notice on campus.
  21. present: It concerns MU operations, the hospital, vet clinics and campus dining, campus places.
  22. present: It concerns MU, the university campus, including hospital and dining services.
  23. present: The message concerns MU, the campus and its hospital, vet clinics and dining.
  24. present: It concerns MU operations, that is the university campus and its services.
  25. present: The delay applies to MU and its hospital, vet clinics and campus dining.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. The two sentences announce a noon opening and unchanged vital service hours; nothing directs recipients to do anything.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It simply reports a delayed opening without telling anyone to take a protective action.
  2. absent: It states new hours but asks recipients to do nothing for their protection.
  3. absent: It states a delayed opening but gives recipients no protective action.
  4. absent: It states a delayed opening but prescribes no protective action for readers.
  5. absent: It states a schedule change without telling recipients any action to take.
  6. absent: It states a delay and service hours but gives recipients no protective action.
  7. absent: It reports a schedule change without telling recipients to take any protective action.
  8. absent: It only sets a delayed opening; recipients are given no protective action.
  9. absent: It states operating hours only and asks no protective action of recipients.
  10. absent: It states an operational delay without telling recipients any action to protect themselves.
  11. absent: It reports a schedule change and issues no protective instruction to recipients.
  12. absent: It states an operational delay but gives readers no protective action to take.
  13. absent: It announces a delayed opening but gives recipients no protective action to take.
  14. absent: It reports a delayed opening only and asks recipients to do nothing protective.
  15. absent: Readers are given no protective instruction, only the new opening time.
  16. absent: It announces a delayed opening but tells recipients no protective action.
  17. absent: Recipients get no protective action, just notice that opening is delayed.
  18. absent: It states a delayed opening but gives recipients no protective action to take.
  19. absent: No protective action is asked of recipients, only an operating-hours announcement.
  20. absent: It simply announces a delayed opening without asking recipients to take any protective step.
  21. absent: No protective action is asked of recipients: it simply announces a later opening time.
  22. absent: It announces a schedule change without directing recipients to take any action.
  23. absent: It states a delayed opening but gives recipients no protective action.
  24. absent: It states a delayed opening but gives recipients no protective action to take.
  25. absent: It announces a schedule change without telling recipients to take any protective step.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The notice is dated "Nov. 26, 2018" and gives the operative time, opening delayed "until noon".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It sets the delay "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  2. present: It sets a delayed opening "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  3. present: It sets the delay "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  4. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and delays opening "until noon".
  5. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and delays opening "until noon".
  6. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and delays opening "until noon".
  7. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and sets the delayed opening at noon.
  8. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and sets the opening at noon.
  9. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and sets the delayed opening "until noon".
  10. present: It sets the delayed opening "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  11. present: The delay runs "until noon" on the dated notice of Nov. 26, 2018.
  12. present: The delay runs "until noon" on the dated day, Nov. 26, 2018.
  13. present: It sets the delay "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  14. present: The delay runs "until noon" and the item is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  15. present: It sets the delayed opening "until noon" on the dated Nov. 26, 2018 notice.
  16. present: It sets the delay "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  17. present: It sets the delayed opening "until noon" on the dated day of Nov. 26, 2018.
  18. present: It sets the delay "until noon" and is dated November 26, 2018.
  19. present: It sets the delay "until noon" on the dated day, Nov. 26, 2018.
  20. present: It states the delay runs "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  21. present: It sets a delayed opening "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  22. present: It is dated Nov. 26, 2018 and sets the delay "until noon".
  23. present: It delays opening "until noon" and is dated Nov. 26, 2018.
  24. present: It sets the delayed opening "until noon" on Nov. 26, 2018.
  25. present: The opening is delayed "until noon" on Nov. 26, 2018.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Reads were unanimous that no consequence, severity or risk from the weather appears anywhere in this short message.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No statement of danger or consequence accompanies the schedule change.
  2. absent: No consequence, risk or severity is mentioned at all.
  3. absent: No potential harm or severity is conveyed, only a schedule change.
  4. absent: No consequence or danger from the weather is described.
  5. absent: No consequence or severity is conveyed, only which services stay on regular hours.
  6. absent: No harm, risk or severity is mentioned at all.
  7. absent: No consequence, danger or severity of the weather is described.
  8. absent: No danger, damage or severity is mentioned at all.
  9. absent: No danger, damage or severity is conveyed.
  10. absent: No danger, damage or severity is conveyed anywhere in the short notice.
  11. absent: Nothing states what the weather could do or how hazardous conditions are.
  12. absent: No harm, risk or severity is described in the two sentence notice.
  13. absent: No severity or consequence of the weather is described.
  14. absent: No harm, danger, or severity is conveyed anywhere in the two sentences.
  15. absent: No danger or consequence is described in this two sentence notice.
  16. absent: No consequence or danger from the weather is expressed.
  17. absent: No potential harm or severity of the weather is expressed.
  18. absent: No danger, damage or severity is conveyed in this brief schedule notice.
  19. absent: Nothing describes any harm or severity from the weather.
  20. absent: Nothing conveys danger, damage or severity from the weather.
  21. absent: No severity or potential harm from the weather is conveyed anywhere.
  22. absent: No danger, damage or severity is conveyed in the one sentence notice.
  23. absent: No severity or potential harm from the weather is stated.
  24. absent: No danger or consequence is described in this one line delay notice.
  25. absent: No harm, risk or severity is stated anywhere in the two sentences.