Northwest-campus power outage at listed buildings; later restored

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present because the branded opener MIT ALERT identifies the sending campus alert system.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT names the sending institution.
  2. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies the sending institution.
  3. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies MIT as the sender.
  4. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies who is sending the message.
  5. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT names the campus alerting system as the sender.
  6. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT identifies MIT as the sender.
  7. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies MIT as the sender.
  8. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies MIT as the sender.
  9. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies MIT as the sender.
  10. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT identifies the sending institution.
  11. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies the sending system and institution.
  12. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT identifies the campus system sending the notice.
  13. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies who is sending the message.
  14. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies the campus sender.
  15. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT identifies the campus warning system that is sending the message.
  16. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies who is sending the message.
  17. present: The opener "MIT ALERT" is a branded campus signature that names who is sending the message.
  18. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies MIT as the sending authority.
  19. present: The branded opener MIT ALERT identifies the sending institution.
  20. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT:" identifies the sending system.
  21. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies the sender as MIT.
  22. present: The message opens with the branded sender tag "MIT ALERT", which identifies who is issuing it.
  23. present: The message opens with the branded signature "MIT ALERT", which identifies the sender.
  24. present: The branded opener "MIT ALERT" identifies the sender as MIT's campus alert system.
  25. present: The branded opening "MIT ALERT" identifies the sender.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present: a power outage names a specific utility threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The text specifies a power outage, which is a named hazard rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: The text names a specific threat: a "Power outage".
  3. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  5. present: The text specifies a Power outage, a named utility failure rather than a vague incident.
  6. present: The text names a Power outage, a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  7. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  8. present: The text names a "Power outage" as the specific problem, not a generic incident.
  9. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  10. present: The text names a Power outage, a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  11. present: It names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic emergency or incident.
  12. present: Power outage names a specific infrastructure threat, not a vague emergency or incident.
  13. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific hazard rather than a generic emergency or incident.
  14. present: It names a "Power outage", a specific utility threat rather than a generic emergency or incident.
  15. present: It names a Power outage, a specific utility threat rather than a generic emergency, incident, or situation.
  16. present: It names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  17. present: The text names a "Power outage", which is a specific utility threat rather than a vague emergency or incident.
  18. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  19. present: The text names a Power outage, a specific hazard rather than a generic incident or emergency.
  20. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  21. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.
  22. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific utility threat rather than a vague emergency or incident.
  23. present: It names "Power outage" as the threat, a specific hazard rather than a vague emergency or situation.
  24. present: The text names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident or situation.
  25. present: It names a "Power outage", a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present at the northwest part of campus and named buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It places the outage in the northwest part of campus and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  2. present: It places the outage on the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  3. present: It locates the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  4. present: It places the outage in "the northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  5. present: It places the outage in the northwest part of campus and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  6. present: It locates the outage in the northwest part of campus and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  7. present: It places the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  8. present: It places the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings such as NW10 and W64.
  9. present: It locates the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  10. present: It places the outage in the northwest part of campus and lists buildings NW10 through W64.
  11. present: The outage is placed in the "northwest part of campus" and in named buildings such as NW10, NW13, and W64.
  12. present: The outage is placed on the northwest part of campus and at listed buildings including NW10, NW13, and W64.
  13. present: It places the outage on "the northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  14. present: The outage is in the "northwest part of campus" and at named buildings including NW10, NW13, and W64.
  15. present: The outage is placed in the northwest part of campus and lists buildings such as NW10, NW13, NW14, and W64.
  16. present: The outage is placed in the "northwest part of campus" and in named buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  17. present: It places the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists affected buildings including NW10, NW13, and W64.
  18. present: It locates the outage on the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  19. present: It places the outage in the northwest part of campus and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  20. present: It locates the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  21. present: It locates the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings NW10 through W64.
  22. present: It locates the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and names buildings NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, and W64.
  23. present: Location is given as the "northwest part of campus" plus named buildings (NW10, NW13, NW14, NW15, NW20, N51, N52, W64).
  24. present: It sites the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings such as NW10, NW13, and W64.
  25. present: It places the outage in the "northwest part of campus" and lists buildings such as NW10 and NW13.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance absent: More info is a link, not an instruction to take a protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The More info URL is not an instruction to take a protective action such as stay inside or avoid the area.
  2. absent: A "More info" link is given, but recipients are not told any protective action to take.
  3. absent: A "More info" link is not an instruction to take any protective action.
  4. absent: A "More info" URL is offered, but no protective action such as stay inside, evacuate, or avoid an area is instructed.
  5. absent: A More info link is given, but recipients are not told to take any protective action.
  6. absent: A More info URL is not an instruction to take a protective action such as stay away or shelter.
  7. absent: No protective action is told to recipients; "More info" plus a URL is only a pointer, not an instruction.
  8. absent: Recipients are not told to shelter, avoid an area, or take any other protective action, only given a link.
  9. absent: No protective action is instructed; the only extra line is a "More info" URL.
  10. absent: A More info link is given, but no protective action such as stay inside or avoid the area is told to readers.
  11. absent: No protective action is given. A "More info" link is not an instruction to shelter, avoid the area, or monitor.
  12. absent: The More info URL is a pointer only, with no protective instruction such as stay inside, avoid an area, or call 911.
  13. absent: No protective instruction is given. The "More info" link is not an order to shelter, avoid, or stay inside.
  14. absent: No protective action is given. A "More info" URL is not an instruction to shelter, avoid, or stay inside.
  15. absent: More info with a URL is only a pointer to a webpage, not an instruction to shelter, avoid an area, or take other protective action.
  16. absent: There is no protective-action instruction. The "More info" URL only points to a website.
  17. absent: No protective instruction appears. A "More info" link is not an order to shelter, avoid, evacuate, or take other action.
  18. absent: No protective action is instructed; a "More info" URL does not tell people to shelter, avoid the area, or act.
  19. absent: A More info URL is not an instruction to take a protective action such as stay inside or avoid the area.
  20. absent: No protective action is given. A "More info" link is not an instruction to shelter, avoid the area, or monitor updates.
  21. absent: No protective action is given. "More info" with a URL is a reference, not an instruction to act.
  22. absent: The "More info" link does not tell recipients to take a protective action such as avoid the area or stay inside.
  23. absent: Recipients are not told to take any protective action. The "More info" URL is a pointer, not guidance.
  24. absent: A "More info" URL is not an instruction to take a protective action such as stay inside or avoid the area.
  25. absent: A "More info" URL is not an instruction telling recipients what protective action to take.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent: no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or ongoing appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing is present.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, ongoing, or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  8. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing is given.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, today, or ongoing appears.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, today, or ongoing appears in the text.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, today, or ongoing appears.
  17. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing.
  18. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency wording such as now, immediately, or ongoing is present.
  23. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency language such as now, immediately, today, or ongoing.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: a power outage is named without a stated consequence or severity for people or property.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Impacted only flags which buildings lost power and does not state harm or severity for people.
  2. absent: "Impacted" only marks which buildings lost power and does not state harm, danger, or severity.
  3. absent: "Impacted" only flags which buildings have the outage and does not state harm, danger, or severity.
  4. absent: "impacted" only marks which buildings lost power and does not state danger, injury, or other harm.
  5. absent: Impacted only marks which buildings lost power and does not state danger, injury, or other harm.
  6. absent: The word impacted only lists which buildings lost power, with no statement of harm, danger, or severity.
  7. absent: "Impacted" only marks which buildings lost power and states no harm, danger, or severity.
  8. absent: Calling buildings "impacted" only flags which sites lost power and does not state danger, injury, or other harm.
  9. absent: "impacted" only marks which buildings are affected; it does not state harm, danger, or severity.
  10. absent: Impacted only flags which buildings have the outage and does not state danger, injury, or other severity.
  11. absent: "Impacted" only lists which buildings lost power. It does not state danger, injury, or other harm.
  12. absent: Impacted only flags which buildings are in the outage footprint, with no harm or severity wording such as dangerous or injury.
  13. absent: "impacted" only marks which buildings have the outage. It does not state harm, danger, or severity.
  14. absent: Calling buildings "impacted" only marks which sites had the outage, not injury, danger, or other harm.
  15. absent: Saying listed buildings are impacted marks which sites lost power and does not state danger, injury, or other severity.
  16. absent: Calling buildings "impacted" only marks which sites are affected. It does not state harm, danger, or severity.
  17. absent: "Impacted" only marks which buildings lost power. It does not state harm, danger, or other consequences for people or property.
  18. absent: Calling buildings "impacted" only marks which sites lost power; it states no danger, injury, or severity.
  19. absent: Impacted only marks which buildings lost power. It does not state harm, danger, or severity for people or property.
  20. absent: Calling buildings "impacted" only marks which sites lost power. It does not state danger, injury, or other severity.
  21. absent: "Impacted" only marks which buildings have the outage, with no harm or severity stated.
  22. absent: Calling listed buildings "impacted" only marks which sites lost power, with no severity or harm such as dangerous or life-threatening.
  23. absent: "impacted" only lists which buildings have the outage. It does not describe harm, danger, or how serious the outage is.
  24. absent: "Impacted" only lists which buildings lost power and does not state danger, injury, or other consequences.
  25. absent: "Impacted" only marks which buildings are affected, with no harm or severity stated.