Robbery on the 1200 block of Montgomery Avenue

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and many also cite police as the responding agency.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender.
  2. present: The branded opening tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and Police are named as responding.
  3. present: The opening tag TUalertEMER is a branded sender signature, and police are named.
  4. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  5. present: The opening tag "TUalertEMER" is a branded sender signature, and police are named.
  6. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and Police are named as responding.
  7. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  8. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sending alert system.
  9. present: TUalertEMER is a branded signature identifying the sender of the message.
  10. present: TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag, and police are identified as the responding agency.
  11. present: "TUalertEMER" is a branded sender tag, and "Police" are identified as the responding agency.
  12. present: TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag at the start of the message.
  13. present: The branded signature TUalertEMER identifies who is issuing the alert.
  14. present: The sender tag "TUalertEMER" brands the alert, and "Police are responding" names the agency.
  15. present: The opening tag TUalertEMER is a branded sender signature.
  16. present: The branded opener "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and "Police" are named as responders.
  17. present: The opening TUalertEMER brand identifies the sender, and police are named.
  18. present: TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag, and police are identified as responding.
  19. present: The opening signature "TUalertEMER" brands the sender, and "Police are responding" names the agency.
  20. present: The opening tag "TUalertEMER" is a branded sender signature, and Police are also named.
  21. present: The TUalertEMER signature identifies who is sending the message, with police named as responding.
  22. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender.
  23. present: TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag, and police are identified as the responding agency.
  24. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies who is sending the alert.
  25. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the message names a robbery, a specific crime threat rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a robbery, a specific threat.
  2. present: It names a Robbery, a specific threat.
  3. present: Robbery is a specific named hazard.
  4. present: It names "Robbery", a specific crime threat.
  5. present: "Robbery" is a specific named threat.
  6. present: It names Robbery as the specific threat.
  7. present: It names "Robbery", a specific threat.
  8. present: Robbery names a specific crime as the threat.
  9. present: Robbery is a specific named threat, not a generic incident or emergency.
  10. present: Robbery is named as the specific threat.
  11. present: It reports a "Robbery", which is a specific named hazard.
  12. present: Robbery is named as the specific threat.
  13. present: It specifies robbery as the threat.
  14. present: A "Robbery" is reported, which names a specific threat rather than a generic incident.
  15. present: It specifies Robbery as the threat.
  16. present: It names "Robbery", a specific crime threat.
  17. present: It reports a robbery, a specific named threat.
  18. present: Robbery is named as the specific hazard.
  19. present: It names "Robbery" as the specific threat.
  20. present: The hazard is specified as "Robbery".
  21. present: Robbery is named as the specific threat.
  22. present: It names a "Robbery", a specific threat.
  23. present: Robbery is named as the specific threat.
  24. present: It names robbery as the specific threat.
  25. present: It reports a "Robbery", a specific named hazard.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: the crime is placed on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave., a named street block.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It locates the incident on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  2. present: It locates the event on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  3. present: It locates the incident on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  4. present: The place is the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave.", a named street block.
  5. present: It specifies the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave."
  6. present: The location is given as the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  7. present: It places the crime on the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave."
  8. present: The 1200 block of Montgomery Ave. is a stated street location.
  9. present: It places the event on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  10. present: It places the crime on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  11. present: The place given is the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave."
  12. present: It cites the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave as the place.
  13. present: It cites the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave as the place.
  14. present: It locates the crime on the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave".
  15. present: It locates the crime on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  16. present: The site is given as the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave".
  17. present: It places the event on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  18. present: It cites the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave as the place.
  19. present: The incident is placed on the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave".
  20. present: It locates the event on the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave".
  21. present: It locates the incident on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  22. present: The location is the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave."
  23. present: It locates the crime on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  24. present: It places the robbery on the 1200 block of Montgomery Ave.
  25. present: The place is the "1200 block of Montgomery Ave."
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present because recipients are told to avoid the area, a protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs recipients to avoid the area.
  2. present: Recipients are told to Avoid the area.
  3. present: Recipients are instructed to Avoid the area.
  4. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  5. present: Recipients are instructed to "Avoid the area."
  6. present: It instructs people to Avoid the area.
  7. present: It tells recipients to "Avoid the area".
  8. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  9. present: Avoid the area is an instruction for recipients to stay away.
  10. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  11. present: People are told to "Avoid the area" as a protective step.
  12. present: Avoid the area is an instruction to stay away.
  13. present: Avoid the area is a clear protective instruction.
  14. present: People are instructed to "Avoid the area".
  15. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  16. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  17. present: Recipients are told to avoid the area.
  18. present: People are told to avoid the area.
  19. present: It tells people to "Avoid the area", a protective action for recipients.
  20. present: The instruction "Avoid the area" tells recipients what to do.
  21. present: Avoid the area is an instruction to take protective action.
  22. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  23. present: Avoid the area directs people to stay away as a protective action.
  24. present: It instructs people to avoid the area.
  25. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid the area".
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent: no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately is given.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency cue.
  3. absent: There is no time of day, date, or recency word.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is given.
  5. absent: Nothing indicates when the robbery occurred or any recency cue.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other recency wording is present.
  9. absent: There is no time of day, date, or word such as now or ongoing.
  10. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency wording such as now or immediately.
  11. absent: Nothing indicates when it happened or that action is needed now.
  12. absent: There is no time of day, date, or recency phrase such as now.
  13. absent: There is no time of day, date, or word such as now or immediately.
  14. absent: Nothing in the text gives a time of day, date, or word showing recency.
  15. absent: Nothing indicates when the robbery occurred or that action is needed now.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  17. absent: There is no time of day, date, or recency phrasing.
  18. absent: No time of day, date, or recency phrase is given.
  19. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or ongoing.
  20. absent: There is no date, clock time, or recency cue in the text.
  21. absent: Nothing in the text gives a time, date, or recency word.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue is present.
  23. absent: There is no time of day, date, or recency phrase such as now or immediately.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other recency phrase appears.
  25. absent: There is no time, date, or recency phrase in the message.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: robbery is named without any statement of harm, danger, or how serious it is.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity beyond naming the robbery is stated.
  2. absent: The message does not say what harm the robbery could cause or how serious it is.
  3. absent: Nothing describes severity or what harm the robbery could cause.
  4. absent: The message does not state what the robbery could do or how serious it is.
  5. absent: The alert does not describe harm, danger, or other consequences of the robbery.
  6. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity for people or property is stated.
  7. absent: The robbery is named without stating injury, danger, or other harm.
  8. absent: Robbery is named but no injury, danger, or other consequence is stated.
  9. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the robbery itself.
  10. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming the robbery itself.
  11. absent: No severity or harm language appears beyond naming the robbery.
  12. absent: The text does not describe harm, severity, or what the robbery could do to people.
  13. absent: No consequence or severity language accompanies the robbery report.
  14. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the robbery itself.
  15. absent: The message does not describe harm, danger, or other consequences of the robbery.
  16. absent: Robbery is named but the text never states consequences, injury risk, or other severity.
  17. absent: No severity or harm language appears beyond the crime name.
  18. absent: Nothing is said about severity or what the robbery could do to people or property.
  19. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond naming the robbery itself.
  20. absent: Nothing describes what the robbery could do or how serious it is.
  21. absent: No outcome or seriousness is described beyond naming the robbery.
  22. absent: The robbery is named without any statement of harm, danger, or severity.
  23. absent: The message does not describe what the robbery could do to people or how severe it is.
  24. absent: Robbery is named but no injury, danger, or other consequence is stated.
  25. absent: The robbery is not tied to any stated harm, severity, or likely outcome.