Strong-arm robbery on the 1600 block of North 15th

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and many also note that police are named as responding.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender.
  2. present: The branded opening tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and Police are named as responding.
  3. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  4. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  5. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  6. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and Police are named as responding.
  7. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and "Police are responding" names the agency.
  8. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sending alert system.
  9. present: The opener TUalertEMER is a branded sender tag that identifies who issued the alert.
  10. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  11. present: The branded opener "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and "Police" are named as responders.
  12. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sending alert system.
  13. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sending alert system.
  14. present: The branded opener "TUalertEMER" identifies the sending alert system, and police are named as responding.
  15. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  16. present: The branded opener "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and "Police" are named as responders.
  17. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and Police are named as responding.
  18. present: The branded tag TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and police are named as the responding agency.
  19. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and "Police are responding" names the agency.
  20. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and Police are named as responders.
  21. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  22. present: The branded tag "TUalertEMER" identifies who is sending the message.
  23. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies the sender, and police are named as responding.
  24. present: The branded opener TUalertEMER identifies who is sending the alert.
  25. present: The branded opener "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender, and "Police are responding" names the agency.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard present because the message names a strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  2. present: It names a Strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  3. present: It names Strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  4. present: It names "Strong arm robbery", a specific crime threat.
  5. present: It names "Strong arm robbery," a specific crime threat.
  6. present: It names Strong arm robbery as the specific threat.
  7. present: It names "Strong arm robbery", a specific crime threat.
  8. present: Strong arm robbery names a specific crime as the threat.
  9. present: Strong arm robbery names a specific crime threat.
  10. present: Strong arm robbery is a specific named crime and threat.
  11. present: It names "Strong arm robbery" as the specific crime threat.
  12. present: It names a strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  13. present: It names a strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  14. present: It reports a "Strong arm robbery", which is a specific crime threat.
  15. present: It names Strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  16. present: It names "Strong arm robbery", a specific crime threat.
  17. present: It names a strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  18. present: Strong arm robbery is a specific named threat.
  19. present: It names "Strong arm robbery", a specific crime threat.
  20. present: It names "Strong arm robbery" as the specific threat.
  21. present: It specifies a strong arm robbery, a named crime threat.
  22. present: It names a "Strong arm robbery", a specific crime threat.
  23. present: It names a strong arm robbery, which is a specific crime threat.
  24. present: It names strong arm robbery, a specific crime threat.
  25. present: It names "Strong arm robbery", a specific crime threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: the incident is placed at the 1600 block of N.15th St., a named street block.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It locates the incident at the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  2. present: The location is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  3. present: The site is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  4. present: The place is the "1600 block of N.15th St.", a street block.
  5. present: The location is given as the "1600 block of N.15th St."
  6. present: The location is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  7. present: The crime is located at the "1600 block of N.15th St."
  8. present: The 1600 block of N.15th St. is a stated street location.
  9. present: The place is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  10. present: The location is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  11. present: The incident is located at the "1600 block of N.15th St."
  12. present: The event is placed at the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  13. present: The event is placed at the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  14. present: The location is the "1600 block of N.15th St", a street block.
  15. present: The site is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  16. present: The site is given as the "1600 block of N.15th St".
  17. present: The location is the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  18. present: The event is located at the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  19. present: The place is specified as the "1600 block of N.15th St".
  20. present: The location is the "1600 block of N.15th St".
  21. present: The location is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  22. present: The event is placed at the "1600 block of N.15th St."
  23. present: The site is given as the 1600 block of N.15th St., a street location.
  24. present: It places the robbery at the 1600 block of N.15th St.
  25. present: The site is given as the "1600 block of N.15th St."
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present because recipients are instructed to avoid the area, a protective action.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It instructs recipients to avoid the area.
  2. present: It instructs people to Avoid the area.
  3. present: It instructs people to Avoid the area.
  4. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  5. present: "Avoid the area" instructs recipients to stay away.
  6. present: It instructs people to Avoid the area.
  7. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  8. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  9. present: Avoid the area tells recipients what protective action to take.
  10. present: Avoid the area is an instruction to take a protective action.
  11. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  12. present: It tells people to avoid the area.
  13. present: It instructs people to avoid the area.
  14. present: The line "Avoid the area" tells recipients what protective action to take.
  15. present: It instructs people to Avoid the area.
  16. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  17. present: It instructs people to avoid the area.
  18. present: Avoid the area is an instruction to take a protective action.
  19. present: Recipients are told to "Avoid the area", which is a protective instruction.
  20. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  21. present: It tells people to avoid the area.
  22. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
  23. present: Avoid the area is an instruction telling recipients what protective action to take.
  24. present: It instructs people to avoid the area.
  25. present: It instructs people to "Avoid the area".
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent: no clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  4. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  5. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  8. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other recency wording is present.
  9. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording is present.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency cue is present.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other timing word is given.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other recency wording appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately is given.
  15. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  16. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  18. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately.
  19. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase such as now or immediately is present.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency phrase such as now or immediately appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other timing cue is present.
  22. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or other recency wording appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, now, or other recency phrase appears.
  25. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately appears.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: robbery is named but no injury, danger, or other consequence or severity is stated.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity such as injury risk is stated.
  2. absent: Naming the robbery does not state consequences or severity for people or property.
  3. absent: Robbery is named but the text states no injury, danger, or other harm.
  4. absent: Robbery is named, but the text does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  5. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity, such as injury risk, is stated.
  6. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity for people or property is stated.
  7. absent: Robbery is named, but no injury, danger, or other consequence is stated.
  8. absent: Robbery is named but no injury, danger, or other consequence is stated.
  9. absent: The robbery is named but nothing is said about harm, danger, or how serious it is.
  10. absent: The robbery is named but the text never states injury, danger, or other consequences.
  11. absent: Robbery is named, but the text never states injury, danger, or other consequences.
  12. absent: Robbery is named but nothing is said about injury, danger, or other consequences.
  13. absent: Robbery is named but the text never states harm, injury, or how serious it is.
  14. absent: Robbery is named, but the message does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  15. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity language is given.
  16. absent: Robbery is named but the text never states consequences, injury risk, or other severity.
  17. absent: Robbery is named but the text does not state injury, danger, or other consequences.
  18. absent: The robbery is named but the text never states injury, danger, or other harm it could cause.
  19. absent: Robbery is named but the text never states consequences or how serious the harm could be.
  20. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity for people or property is stated.
  21. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity such as injury risk or danger is stated.
  22. absent: Robbery is named but no consequence or severity, such as injury risk, is stated.
  23. absent: Robbery is named but nothing states injury risk, danger, or other consequences.
  24. absent: Robbery is named but no injury, danger, or other consequence is stated.
  25. absent: Robbery is named but the text never states injury, danger, or other consequences.