Robbery on the fifth floor after tailgating into the building

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the office alerted to the robbery.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the unit alerted to the robbery.
  2. present: The first sentence credits Campus Safety with being alerted to the robbery.
  3. present: Source is present because Campus Safety appears as the responding campus authority.
  4. present: A named campus agency, Campus Safety, is the actor in the first sentence.
  5. present: Who issued the notice is identifiable from the Campus Safety intake line.
  6. present: Campus Safety functions here as the listed campus law enforcement office.
  7. present: The text attributes the alert to Campus Safety rather than an unnamed sender.
  8. present: Naming Campus Safety satisfies the who is sending test for a campus authority.
  9. present: The only agency in the body is Campus Safety, which was alerted to the crime.
  10. present: Recipients can tell the notice comes from Campus Safety, the named department.
  11. present: Rollins College is identified in the Campus Safety Department that was alerted.
  12. present: Campus Safety was alerted identifies the issuing campus authority.
  13. present: The college names its Campus Safety Department as the office that learned of the robbery.
  14. present: Source is the Rollins College Campus Safety Department, stated up front.
  15. present: A named campus safety unit identifies who is responding.
  16. present: Timely Notification plus Campus Safety together identify the issuing campus office.
  17. present: The handling office is stated as Campus Safety in the opening sentence.
  18. present: Campus Safety appears as the official unit handling the Sutton Place robbery report.
  19. present: Readers can identify Campus Safety as the authority that was alerted.
  20. present: Source is present: the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  21. present: The department that was alerted is Campus Safety, a named public safety office.
  22. present: Who is sending is Campus Safety, named as the office that received the alert.
  23. present: The notice is voiced by Campus Safety, which was alerted to the Sutton Place robbery.
  24. present: A campus public safety department is identified as taking the Clery notice.
  25. present: Rollins College Campus Safety Department was alerted names the source up front.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous agreement that robbery names a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header names robbery, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: A robbery on the 5th floor is a concrete named threat, not a vague emergency.
  3. present: What the threat is is answered as robbery, stated in both the title and the body.
  4. present: Campus Safety was alerted to a robbery, which names the hazard plainly.
  5. present: Non generic wording appears: robbery, not incident or situation alone.
  6. present: The crime type is robbery, named in the header beside Sutton Place.
  7. present: Header and body both specify robbery as the reported offense.
  8. present: A robbery is a defined property crime, not a vague label.
  9. present: Four male suspects gaining entry still leaves robbery as the named hazard.
  10. present: The title line Robbery, Sutton Place names a specific threat.
  11. present: Hazard is robbery, stated as the reason for the timely notification.
  12. present: A robbery that took place is a specific crime, not merely an emergency.
  13. present: Naming robbery satisfies the specific threat requirement.
  14. present: The report concerns a robbery, a concrete property crime.
  15. present: The message titles the event robbery, which is a specific threat type.
  16. present: Hazard coding is met by the word robbery in the headline and narrative.
  17. present: The threat is a robbery by four male suspects, which is specific.
  18. present: A specific Clery crime, robbery, is stated rather than a generic situation.
  19. present: The body explains that a robbery took place, a defined offense.
  20. present: Alerted to a robbery names a particular crime rather than an incident alone.
  21. present: Robbery, Sutton Place in the title block names the hazard and is then repeated.
  22. present: The suspects' entry after being let in still leaves robbery as the named threat.
  23. present: Hazard is present because robbery is named in the title and the first sentence.
  24. present: The reported offense is robbery, which is specific rather than generic.
  25. present: A robbery that took place on a named floor is a specific threat, not a situation.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location on the 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The robbery is placed on the 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments.
  2. present: Location includes Sutton Place Apartments and a floor number.
  3. present: Sutton Place in the header and Sutton Place Apartments in the body both answer where.
  4. present: Readers are told the event took place on the 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments.
  5. present: A building name, Sutton Place Apartments, answers where the crime happened.
  6. present: The 5th floor is a specific interior location inside Sutton Place.
  7. present: Place is given as Sutton Place Apartments rather than an unnamed area.
  8. present: Geography is a named campus building plus a floor.
  9. present: In Sutton Place after being let in further specifies the apartment site.
  10. present: The 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments is an explicit location phrase.
  11. present: Named place: Sutton Place Apartments.
  12. present: Gaining entry to Sutton Place locates the suspects at that complex.
  13. present: The text says the robbery took place on the 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments.
  14. present: Location coding is met by Sutton Place Apartments and the 5th floor.
  15. present: Where is answered with the apartment name Sutton Place and a floor.
  16. present: Sutton Place Apartments is a named housing site.
  17. present: The report is geographically anchored at Sutton Place.
  18. present: The 5th floor further pins the crime inside Sutton Place Apartments.
  19. present: Campus housing is identified as Sutton Place Apartments.
  20. present: The location element is met by naming Sutton Place Apartments.
  21. present: Where the crime happened is the 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments.
  22. present: A named residential complex plus a floor number satisfy location.
  23. present: Sutton Place is a concrete named place on campus housing.
  24. present: The phrase on the 5th floor of Sutton Place Apartments is an explicit site.
  25. present: Location is present because Sutton Place Apartments is a named site.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Complete agreement that the notice contains no protective instruction to recipients.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sentence tells recipients to avoid Sutton Place, lock doors, or take other protective action.
  2. absent: The body only reports that a crime occurred and never instructs the audience.
  3. absent: There is no shelter, evacuate, stay away, or remain indoors language.
  4. absent: Was alerted describes intake, which is responder work rather than public guidance.
  5. absent: Timely Notification is a product label, not an instruction to lock doors or leave.
  6. absent: Nothing directs people to call anyone, monitor updates, or avoid the area.
  7. absent: The short notice contains zero how to protect language for recipients.
  8. absent: Recipients are not told to stay inside, leave, or secure belongings.
  9. absent: Guidance is absent: the text has no instruction telling people what to do to stay safe.
  10. absent: CCTV review describes investigative work, not a protective action for students.
  11. absent: Being let in by a resident is how suspects entered, not guidance to the public.
  12. absent: No call, avoid, lock, or monitor instruction appears anywhere in the notice.
  13. absent: Four male suspects is a description, not an audience directive.
  14. absent: Protective action for the public is missing entirely from this short notice.
  15. absent: Exiting the building describes a resident's movement, not a public instruction.
  16. absent: Follow instructions, seek shelter, and similar verbs do not appear.
  17. absent: Readers are not told to avoid Sutton Place Apartments or watch for the suspects.
  18. absent: The notice never says call 911, evacuate, or lock doors.
  19. absent: Known acquaintances of the victim is case information, not guidance.
  20. absent: There is not even a tips line asking people to call, let alone a protective action.
  21. absent: Not affiliated with Rollins College is not an instruction to the audience.
  22. absent: The only content is a report of a past robbery, with no audience directive.
  23. absent: No stay away, do not enter, or remain indoors wording is present.
  24. absent: Guidance fails because recipients are never told what to do to stay safe.
  25. absent: A review of CCTV footage is agency activity, not guidance to recipients.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that November 18, 2024 and November 17, 2024 satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: November 18, 2024 appears as the header date.
  2. present: On November 17, 2024 opens the narrative with the incident date.
  3. present: Two mentions of November 2024 dates satisfy when.
  4. present: A calendar date stamps both the timely notification and the underlying robbery.
  5. present: Time is present via the printed November 18, 2024 dateline.
  6. present: On November 17, 2024, Campus Safety was alerted supplies when.
  7. present: The timely notification carries the date November 18, 2024.
  8. present: Recency is conveyed by dating the report the day after the robbery.
  9. present: A specific day in 2024 is given for the robbery.
  10. present: November 17, 2024 is an explicit time reference for the robbery.
  11. present: The header date November 18, 2024 satisfies when.
  12. present: Two calendar dates appear, which satisfies the time element.
  13. present: Time coding is met by November 17 and November 18, 2024.
  14. present: A specific day, November 17, 2024, is stated for the robbery.
  15. present: The notice is not timeless: it names November dates in the header and body.
  16. present: Dated language includes November 17, 2024 as the day of the robbery.
  17. present: The November dates meet the when or recency test.
  18. present: Time is not missing: two November 2024 dates are in the text.
  19. present: November 18, 2024 dates the timely notification itself.
  20. present: The first sentence dates the robbery On November 17, 2024.
  21. present: A calendar date appears at the top and the incident date appears in the body.
  22. present: When is answered with November 17, 2024 for the crime and November 18, 2024 for the notice.
  23. present: The robbery is placed on a stated calendar day, November 17, 2024.
  24. present: Time is present through dated header and dated first sentence.
  25. present: The November 18, 2024 dateline and the November 17, 2024 crime date both mark when.
• Impactabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because robbery names the crime without severity wording. A few treat victim and forced taking as implied harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Robbery names the offense without extra severity words such as dangerous or violent.
  2. absent: No sentence states injury, force, or other consequences the robbery could cause.
  3. absent: The notice never says the robbery could injure anyone or destroy property.
  4. present: The word victim implies someone suffered the robbery, a kind of harm.
  5. absent: Impact fails because only the crime name and a place appear, with no consequence clause.
  6. absent: No life threatening, may cause injury, or destructive wording is used.
  7. absent: Naming a robbery does not by itself convey how serious the effects are.
  8. absent: There is no statement of what the robbery could do to people or apartments.
  9. absent: The message does not warn of injury, danger, or further attacks.
  10. absent: Known acquaintances of the victim add suspect detail, not a consequence clause.
  11. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime's name.
  12. absent: Not affiliated with Rollins College is suspect status, not severity language.
  13. absent: Tailgating into the building describes method of entry, not harm to people.
  14. present: Robbery of a resident implies taking property from a victim by force.
  15. absent: The text does not call the robbery dangerous, damaging, or life threatening.
  16. absent: CCTV footage of suspects adds investigative detail, not a consequence statement.
  17. absent: No explicit statement of what the robbery could do to people is given.
  18. absent: Impact coding fails: the hazard is named without a consequence or seriousness phrase.
  19. absent: Four suspects gaining entry describes how they got in, not what harm followed.
  20. absent: Providing CCTV findings does not equal stating the hazard's potential effects.
  21. absent: The notice never uses dangerous, deadly, or may cause injury language.
  22. absent: Victim is used as a role label in a crime report, not as a severity clause.
  23. absent: There is no could be deadly or similar consequence language.
  24. absent: Known acquaintances adds relationship detail, not a statement of harm.
  25. absent: Impact is absent because naming robbery does not by itself describe what it could do.