Stalking at Sutton Place by a known student

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the handling office, and Title IX is identified as the reporting office.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the unit that received the Title IX report.
  2. present: The first sentence credits Campus Safety with receiving the stalking report.
  3. present: The Office of Title IX is named as the office that forwarded the report to Campus Safety.
  4. present: The closing line lists Campus Safety with a phone number and email, identifying the sender.
  5. present: Rollins College appears in the department name that took the report.
  6. present: Source is present because Campus Safety is the campus authority handling the notice.
  7. present: Who is sending is clear from Campus Safety as both intake office and contact.
  8. present: A named campus agency, Campus Safety, is the actor in the opening sentence.
  9. present: Recipients can tell the notice comes from Campus Safety, the named department.
  10. present: Campus Safety functions here as the listed campus public safety office.
  11. present: The text attributes report receipt to the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  12. present: Naming Campus Safety satisfies the who is sending test for a campus authority.
  13. present: The only agencies in the body are Campus Safety and Title IX.
  14. present: The notice is voiced through Campus Safety, which received the Title IX report.
  15. present: A campus public safety department is identified as taking the Clery notice.
  16. present: Rollins College Campus Safety Department received a report names the source up front.
  17. present: The email campussafety@rollins.edu at the end brands the issuing office.
  18. present: Source is the named department taking the timely notification.
  19. present: Timely Notification plus Campus Safety together identify the issuing campus office.
  20. present: The college names its Campus Safety Department as the office that took the report.
  21. present: Source is present: Campus Safety plus the Office of Title IX.
  22. present: A named campus safety unit identifies who is responding.
  23. present: The handling office is stated as Campus Safety throughout the notice.
  24. present: Campus Safety appears as the official unit receiving the Sutton Place stalking report.
  25. present: Readers are pointed to Campus Safety as the authority to contact, which identifies the source.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous agreement that stalking and repeated unwanted contact name a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header and body both name stalking, a specific crime rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: Repeated, unwanted contact and behavior specifies stalking rather than a vague emergency.
  3. present: An incident of stalking is a concrete named threat, not merely an emergency or situation.
  4. present: The message titles the event Stalking, which is a specific threat type.
  5. present: Hazard is present because stalking and repeated unwanted contact are both named.
  6. present: A known student engaged in stalking conduct, which names the offense plainly.
  7. present: What the threat is is answered as stalking, stated in the title and the body.
  8. present: Non generic wording appears: stalking, not incident or situation alone.
  9. present: The crime type is stalking, described as repeated unwanted contact.
  10. present: Header and body both specify stalking as the reported offense.
  11. present: A report of stalking is a defined interpersonal crime, not a vague label.
  12. present: Unwanted contact and behavior toward another student names a particular stalking pattern.
  13. present: Naming stalking satisfies the specific threat requirement.
  14. present: The text classifies the event as stalking at Sutton Place Apartments.
  15. present: Hazard is stalking, stated as the reason for the timely notification.
  16. present: The report concerns repeated contact that was unwanted, a concrete hostile pattern.
  17. present: Stalking is the listed Clery crime, not a generic incident word used alone.
  18. present: Campus Safety received a report regarding stalking, which names the hazard.
  19. present: Repeated, unwanted contact is a specific conduct description, not a placeholder emergency.
  20. present: The notice is about stalking between two identified students, a named crime.
  21. present: Hazard coding is met by the word stalking in the headline and narrative.
  22. present: The threat is stalking by a known Rollins student, which is specific.
  23. present: Title IX reported an incident of stalking, a defined offense.
  24. present: The body explains stalking as repeated unwanted behavior toward another student.
  25. present: A specific interpersonal crime, stalking, is stated rather than a generic situation.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location at Sutton Place Apartments, a named housing site.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The stalking is placed at Sutton Place Apartments, a named housing site.
  2. present: Location is Sutton Place Apartments, given in the first narrative sentence.
  3. present: Sutton Place Apartments answers where the reported stalking occurred.
  4. present: A named apartment complex, Sutton Place, is the location of the report.
  5. present: The text places the incident at Sutton Place Apartments rather than an unnamed area.
  6. present: Geography is a named campus housing complex, Sutton Place Apartments.
  7. present: Readers are told the event occurred at Sutton Place Apartments.
  8. present: Location coding is met by Sutton Place Apartments.
  9. present: Place is given as Sutton Place Apartments rather than an unnamed area.
  10. present: The phrase at Sutton Place Apartments is an explicit location.
  11. present: Where the stalking happened is Sutton Place Apartments.
  12. present: A named residential site, Sutton Place Apartments, is the setting.
  13. present: The notice sites the stalking at Sutton Place Apartments.
  14. present: Sutton Place is a concrete named place, which satisfies location.
  15. present: The first sentence locates the stalking at Sutton Place Apartments.
  16. present: Named place: Sutton Place Apartments.
  17. present: The crime is tied to a specific apartment community, Sutton Place.
  18. present: Location is present because Sutton Place Apartments is a named site.
  19. present: The text says the stalking occurred at Sutton Place Apartments.
  20. present: An apartment name, Sutton Place, answers where.
  21. present: Sutton Place Apartments is the only geographic identifier and it is specific.
  22. present: The report is geographically anchored at Sutton Place Apartments.
  23. present: Where the conduct happened is Sutton Place Apartments, a named complex.
  24. present: Campus housing is identified as Sutton Place Apartments.
  25. present: The location element is met by naming Sutton Place Apartments.
• Guidanceabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no protective instruction: contacting Campus Safety for additional information is a tips request. A minority treats that phone line as guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sentence tells recipients to avoid Sutton Place, lock doors, or take other protective action.
  2. absent: Contact Campus Safety if you have additional information is a request for tips, not guidance.
  3. absent: Care and resources are for the reporting party, which describes responder aid rather than public action.
  4. present: The close tells readers to contact Campus Safety at 407-646-2999, an action similar to calling police.
  5. absent: Being connected with campus offices describes help for the victim, not an instruction to the audience.
  6. absent: There is no shelter, evacuate, stay away, or remain indoors language.
  7. absent: The body reports a past stalking case and never instructs the audience to protect themselves.
  8. absent: Timely Notification is a product label, not an instruction to lock doors or leave.
  9. absent: Nothing directs people to avoid the area, monitor updates, or stay inside.
  10. absent: Recipients are not told to stay inside, leave, or secure their rooms.
  11. absent: Guidance is absent: the text has no instruction telling people what to do to stay safe.
  12. absent: Please contact Campus Safety is a tips line, which is not a protective action.
  13. absent: Both individuals have been identified is status, not a directive to the public.
  14. absent: Providing care to the reporting party is responder work, not guidance to recipients.
  15. absent: The notice never says call 911, evacuate, or lock doors.
  16. absent: Asking for additional information is a request for tips, not protective guidance.
  17. absent: No protective action for the campus community is stated.
  18. absent: Follow instructions, seek shelter, and similar verbs do not appear.
  19. absent: Readers are not told to avoid Sutton Place Apartments or watch for anyone.
  20. absent: The phone number is offered only if you have additional information, a tips ask.
  21. absent: The email contact is for extra information, not a safety instruction.
  22. present: Please contact Campus Safety at the listed number tells people to call the department, which can count as guidance.
  23. absent: Identifying both parties and stating no ongoing threat is not an instruction to act.
  24. absent: Guidance fails because the only ask is to share additional information, not to take cover or leave.
  25. absent: Protective action for the public is missing, and only a tips contact is offered.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that February 20, 2025 and the February 12 to 17 window satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: February 20, 2025 appears as the header date.
  2. present: The report date February 18, 2025 and the February 12 to 17 window both mark when.
  3. present: Between February 12 and February 17, 2025 is an explicit date range.
  4. present: Recency is present through at this time plus the dated report.
  5. present: Two calendar dates plus a several day window satisfy the time element.
  6. present: On February 18, 2025 opens the narrative with a date.
  7. present: The timely notification carries the date February 20, 2025.
  8. present: A specific span of days in February 2025 is given for the stalking.
  9. present: Time is present via the printed February 20, 2025 dateline.
  10. present: At this time is a recency cue attached to the no ongoing threat sentence.
  11. present: The incident window February 12 through 17 supplies when the stalking occurred.
  12. present: Three dated references appear: the header, the report day, and the conduct span.
  13. present: A calendar date stamps both the timely notification and the underlying report.
  14. present: The first sentence dates the report On February 18, 2025.
  15. present: Time coding is met by multiple February 2025 dates.
  16. present: When is answered with February dates and the phrase at this time.
  17. present: The stalking is placed in a bounded period, February 12 to February 17, 2025.
  18. present: The header date February 20, 2025 satisfies when.
  19. present: Dated language includes February 18, 2025 as the day Campus Safety was notified.
  20. present: Recency and calendar time are both present in the notice.
  21. present: The notice is not timeless: it names February dates throughout.
  22. present: February 12, 17, 18, and 20, 2025 all function as time stamps.
  23. present: The phrase between February 12 and February 17, 2025 is a clear time window.
  24. present: Time is not missing: dates and at this time are in the text.
  25. present: The February dates meet the when or recency test.
• Impactabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because stalking names the crime without severity wording. A few treat unwanted contact as implied harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Stalking names the offense without extra severity words such as dangerous or life threatening.
  2. absent: No sentence states injury, fear, or other consequences the stalking could cause.
  3. present: Unwanted contact implies distress to the other student, a stated kind of harm.
  4. absent: Impact is absent because naming stalking does not by itself describe what it could do.
  5. absent: There is no could be deadly, may cause injury, or similar consequence language.
  6. absent: Repeated, unwanted contact describes the conduct, not the harm it could produce.
  7. absent: No indication of an ongoing threat actually denies present danger rather than stating impact.
  8. absent: The message does not warn of injury, danger, or further attacks.
  9. absent: Naming a crime does not by itself convey how serious the effects are.
  10. absent: Impact fails because only the crime name and a place appear, with no consequence clause.
  11. absent: There is no life threatening, may cause injury, or destructive wording.
  12. absent: Threat to campus safety appears only to say there is none, which is not a severity claim.
  13. absent: Care and resources for the reporting party do not equal a statement of what stalking could do.
  14. absent: The notice never says the stalking could injure anyone or endanger others.
  15. absent: Unwanted behavior names the stalking method, not a consequence or seriousness clause.
  16. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime's name.
  17. absent: Providing care does not equal stating the hazard's potential effects.
  18. absent: Both individuals identified adds case status, not a harm or severity clause.
  19. absent: The text does not call the stalking dangerous, damaging, or life threatening.
  20. present: Stalking can imply fear, and unwanted contact is a harm cue toward the other student.
  21. absent: No explicit or strongly implied statement of what the stalking could do to people is given.
  22. absent: Campus safety is mentioned only to report the absence of an ongoing threat.
  23. absent: The word threat appears, which some could read as severity, but it is used to deny risk.
  24. present: Repeated unwanted contact is itself a harm statement, showing the student was targeted.
  25. absent: Impact coding fails: the hazard is named without a consequence or seriousness phrase.