Onondaga tornado warning remain indoors away from windows

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "ALERT:", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "ALERT:", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "ALERT:".
  3. present: Source is present because "ALERT:" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("ALERT:") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "ALERT:".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "ALERT:".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "ALERT:".
  8. present: Branded language "ALERT:" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "ALERT:" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "ALERT:".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "ALERT:" as institutional source.
  12. present: "ALERT:" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "ALERT:".
  14. present: Source scores present: "ALERT:" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "ALERT:".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("ALERT:") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "ALERT:".
  18. present: "ALERT:" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "ALERT:".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "ALERT:".
  21. present: Readers see "ALERT:" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "ALERT:" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "ALERT:".
  24. present: The phrase "ALERT:" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "ALERT:".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "tornado warning".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "tornado warning".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "tornado warning".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "tornado warning", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "tornado warning" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "tornado warning".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "tornado warning".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "tornado warning".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "tornado warning" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "tornado warning".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "tornado warning".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "tornado warning".
  12. present: "tornado warning" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "tornado warning".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "tornado warning".
  15. present: Named condition "tornado warning" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "tornado warning" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "tornado warning".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "tornado warning".
  19. present: "tornado warning" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "tornado warning".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "tornado warning".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "tornado warning".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "tornado warning".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "tornado warning".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "tornado warning".
• Locationabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No building, campus, street, or area is named.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No building, campus, street, or area is named.
  2. absent: Location is absent: the text never says where.
  3. absent: There is no place cue for recipients to orient to.
  4. absent: L=0 because spatial reference is missing.
  5. absent: The alert omits campus or site detail.
  6. absent: Where this applies is never stated.
  7. absent: No location language appears in the body.
  8. absent: Place naming fails on this wording.
  9. absent: Readers get no geographic anchor.
  10. absent: Location element is not satisfied.
  11. absent: Without a place name, L is zero.
  12. absent: The message leaves location unspecified.
  13. absent: No hall, campus, or area reference is present.
  14. absent: Spatial information is missing entirely.
  15. absent: L fails the place-naming test.
  16. absent: Affected site is not identified.
  17. absent: Location codes absent here.
  18. absent: The text is silent on where.
  19. absent: No campus geography is given.
  20. absent: Place element cannot be coded present.
  21. absent: Where-cue is blank in this alert.
  22. absent: Location not established by the wording.
  23. absent: Site detail is omitted.
  24. absent: No area or building reference exists.
  25. absent: L is absent on a pure no-place text.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "Remain indoors".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "Remain indoors".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "Remain indoors".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "Remain indoors".
  4. present: "Remain indoors" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "Remain indoors" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "Remain indoors".
  7. present: Guidance present: "Remain indoors".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "Remain indoors".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "Remain indoors".
  10. present: "Remain indoors" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "Remain indoors" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "Remain indoors".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "Remain indoors".
  14. present: Operational direction: "Remain indoors".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "Remain indoors".
  16. present: "Remain indoors" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "Remain indoors".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "Remain indoors" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "Remain indoors".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "Remain indoors".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "Remain indoors".
  22. present: "Remain indoors" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "Remain indoors".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "Remain indoors".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "Remain indoors".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  3. present: When is answered with "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  4. present: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  8. present: Temporal detail "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  11. present: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  13. present: T codes yes on "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  17. present: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  20. present: Date or hour language "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  22. present: The when signal is "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  23. present: Time present through "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…".
  24. present: "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "URGENT S U WEATHER ALERT: National Weat…" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.