Stay-in-place for shots fired near 221 E Rochelle

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found S present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  2. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  3. present: The sender is identified by "UC Emergency" and by "Police" as the responding authority.
  4. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" identifies the responding agency.
  5. present: Identifies the source via the "UC Emergency" prefix and "Police" as responders.
  6. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  7. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" names the sender and responding authority.
  8. present: The opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify who is sending and responding.
  9. present: The opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify who is sending and responding.
  10. present: The message begins with UC Emergency and names Police as the responding authority.
  11. present: The message opens with "UC Emergency" and cites "Police" as the responders.
  12. present: The branded "UC Emergency" tag and "Police" identify the source and agency.
  13. present: The branded tag "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify who is sending and responding.
  14. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the issuing authority.
  15. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" identifies the responding agency.
  16. present: The "UC Emergency" signature identifies who is sending the alert.
  17. present: "UC Emergency" brands the sender and "Police" names the responding authority.
  18. present: The message opens with "UC Emergency" and names "Police" as responders.
  19. present: The branded tag "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies who is issuing and responding.
  20. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  21. present: The branded signature "UC Emergency-" and the word "Police" both identify who is issuing or responding.
  22. present: Branded "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the issuing and responding source.
  23. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  24. present: "UC Emergency" brands the message and "Police" names the issuing or responding authority.
  25. present: The sender tag "UC Emergency-" and the word "Police" identify the issuing and responding source.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found H absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It only says an "emergency reported", which is a generic label and names no specific threat.
  2. absent: It only says "emergency reported", a generic label that names no specific threat.
  3. absent: No specific threat is named, only a generic "emergency reported".
  4. absent: The threat is only called an "emergency", which is too generic to count.
  5. absent: A specific hazard is not named; only a generic "emergency" is reported.
  6. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic label that does not name a specific threat.
  7. absent: It only says "emergency reported", which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  8. absent: A nonspecific "emergency" is reported, which is not a named hazard.
  9. absent: "emergency reported" is a generic situation label, not a named hazard.
  10. absent: Only emergency is used, with no specific threat named.
  11. absent: No specific threat is named, only a generic "emergency".
  12. absent: No specific threat is named, only a generic "emergency reported".
  13. absent: "emergency reported" does not name a specific hazard.
  14. absent: The text only says "emergency reported" and never names a specific threat.
  15. absent: The hazard is only called an "emergency", not a specific threat.
  16. absent: "emergency reported" is too generic to count as a named hazard.
  17. absent: "emergency reported" is not a specific threat name under the hazard rule.
  18. absent: It refers only to an "emergency", not a specific named hazard.
  19. absent: Only "emergency reported" appears, with no specific hazard named.
  20. absent: The text only names an "emergency" and does not specify a threat such as shots fired or fire.
  21. absent: The hazard stays unnamed beyond the generic word "emergency".
  22. absent: The threat is labeled only as an "emergency", with no specific hazard named.
  23. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic word that does not name a specific threat.
  24. absent: A specific hazard is never named; the event is only an "emergency reported".
  25. absent: No specific hazard is named, only "emergency reported".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found L present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is placed "near 221 E Rochelle St", a specific street address.
  2. present: The report is placed "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  3. present: The site is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  4. present: It cites "near 221 E Rochelle St", a specific street address.
  5. present: The report is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  6. present: It places the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a specific street address.
  7. present: It locates the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a specific street address.
  8. present: Location is given as "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  9. present: The report is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  10. present: It cites near 221 E Rochelle St, a street address.
  11. present: Location is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  12. present: The location is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  13. present: It cites "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  14. present: It places the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a specific street address.
  15. present: It locates the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  16. present: It places the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  17. present: Places the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  18. present: The report is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  19. present: It gives a street address: "near 221 E Rochelle St".
  20. present: It locates the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  21. present: It locates the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  22. present: The report is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  23. present: It locates the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  24. present: The place is "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
  25. present: It locates the report "near 221 E Rochelle St", a street address.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found G present (25 present / 0 absent).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  2. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  3. present: "Stay at your location" is an instruction to remain in place if it is safe.
  4. present: "Stay at your location" is an instruction to remain in place if safe.
  5. present: Recipients are told to stay at their location if safe and to take action as needed.
  6. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to be observant and take action as needed.
  7. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "be observant/take action as needed".
  8. present: Stay-at-location and "take action as needed" are instructions to the audience.
  9. present: "If safe, stay at your location" is a stay-put protective action for recipients.
  10. present: Recipients are instructed to stay at their location if safe and remain observant.
  11. present: "stay at your location" is an instruction to remain in place if it is safe.
  12. present: Recipients are instructed to stay at their location if it is safe.
  13. present: "stay at your location" if safe is an instruction to remain in place.
  14. present: It tells recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  15. present: "stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take.
  16. present: "stay at your location" is an instruction to remain in place if safe.
  17. present: Tells recipients to stay at their location if safe, which is a stay-put protective action.
  18. present: "stay at your location" tells people to remain in place.
  19. present: Recipients are instructed to stay at their location if safe, a protective action.
  20. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  21. present: "If safe, stay at your location" and "Be observant" tell recipients what to do.
  22. present: Recipients are instructed to stay at their location if safe and to take action as needed.
  23. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective action.
  24. present: People are instructed to remain where they are: "stay at your location" if it is safe.
  25. present: "If safe, stay at your location" is a stay-in-place protective action.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found T absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: No time, date, or recency word such as now or ongoing is given.
  4. absent: The text gives no time, date, or recency cue such as immediately.
  5. absent: The message has no clock time, date, or recency marker for the incident.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  8. absent: The message has no time stamp, date, or recency words like now or immediately.
  9. absent: The alert has no clock time, date, or recency phrasing such as now or immediately.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, or words like now or immediately convey when this is happening.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or words like now, immediately, or ongoing appear.
  12. absent: There is no time, date, or recency phrase such as now or immediately.
  13. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or until-further-notice cue is stated.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  15. absent: The text has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or ongoing.
  16. absent: The wording has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or ongoing marker.
  17. absent: No clock time, date, or words like now, immediately, or ongoing appear.
  18. absent: Neither a clock time nor words like now, immediately, or today appear.
  19. absent: No time, date, or recency cue such as now, ongoing, or immediately is given.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or today appears.
  21. absent: The message has no clock time, date, or recency phrasing about the event.
  22. absent: There is no clock time, date, or recency cue about when the incident is occurring.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  24. absent: The body has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar timing language.
  25. absent: No now, immediately, clock time, or date is given.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found I absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unlabeled emergency itself.
  2. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity the unlabeled emergency could cause.
  3. absent: Consequence or seriousness is not stated, only that police are responding.
  4. absent: Severity and potential harm are not stated or clearly implied.
  5. absent: It does not describe harm, danger, or other consequences of the emergency.
  6. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or risk of injury.
  7. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unnamed emergency itself.
  8. absent: No consequence language such as dangerous, deadly, or risk of injury appears.
  9. absent: It does not say the event is dangerous, life-threatening, or otherwise harmful.
  10. absent: There is no statement of consequences or severity beyond naming an emergency.
  11. absent: Severity or potential harm is not stated.
  12. absent: No stated or clearly implied harm or severity is conveyed.
  13. absent: The alert does not say the event is dangerous, injurious, or otherwise severe.
  14. absent: It states no consequence or severity, only that an emergency was reported.
  15. absent: It does not state what the emergency could do or how severe it is.
  16. absent: No consequence such as injury, death, or property harm is stated.
  17. absent: The text does not state potential harm or how serious the event is.
  18. absent: No statement of danger, injury, or other impact is present.
  19. absent: The message never describes consequences or how serious the event is.
  20. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or could cause injury.
  21. absent: There is no stated or clearly implied consequence for people or property.
  22. absent: The text does not convey injury risk, danger, or other consequences of the event.
  23. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity beyond the generic word emergency.
  24. absent: Impact is absent: there is no statement of harm, danger, or severity.
  25. absent: There is no statement of what the emergency could do to people or property.