Armed robbery on 1800 block of N 13th St

To check this alert, Claude Opus 5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The branded "TUalertEMER" tag marks the sending alert system, and police are named as responding.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the branded sender tag for this notice.
  2. present: The branded "TUalertEMER" tag identifies the issuing alert system.
  3. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the sender and police are named as responders.
  4. present: The branded "TUalertEMER" tag names the sending alert service.
  5. present: "TUalertEMER" marks the university as the issuing source, with police responding.
  6. present: The alert is signed "TUalertEMER" with police cited as responding.
  7. present: The "TUalertEMER" prefix identifies the university emergency alert channel as sender.
  8. present: "TUalertEMER" is the branded sender tag.
  9. present: "TUalertEMER" brands the sender and police are identified as responding.
  10. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the branded source identifier.
  11. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the branded institutional source line.
  12. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the university alert system as the sender.
  13. present: The branded prefix "TUalertEMER" plus responding "Police" establish the source.
  14. present: "TUalertEMER" serves as the branded sender and police are named as responders.
  15. present: The "TUalertEMER" signature identifies the university alerting system.
  16. present: Branded as "TUalertEMER", identifying the issuing alert service.
  17. present: The message is signed "TUalertEMER" and names police as responding.
  18. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the sending alert system, with police named as responding.
  19. present: Branded "TUalertEMER" signature plus responding police identify the source.
  20. present: "TUalertEMER" marks this as an official Temple emergency notification.
  21. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the issuing emergency alert service for the university.
  22. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the university's emergency alert channel as sender.
  23. present: "TUalertEMER" identifies the Temple emergency alert system as sender.
  24. present: "TUalertEMER" plus responding police identify who is sending and acting.
  25. present: "TUalertEMER" marks the sender, with police named as responders.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. "Armed Robbery reported" names a specific violent crime, with the weapon element built into the label.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific named crime threat.
  2. present: "Armed Robbery" names a specific violent crime as the threat.
  3. present: "Armed Robbery" names a specific crime involving a weapon.
  4. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific named crime involving a weapon.
  5. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific violent-crime hazard.
  6. present: "Armed Robbery reported" names a specific violent crime.
  7. present: "Armed Robbery" names a specific crime involving a weapon.
  8. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific named crime.
  9. present: "Armed Robbery" names a specific crime involving a weapon.
  10. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specifically named crime involving a weapon.
  11. present: "Armed Robbery" is an explicitly named crime hazard.
  12. present: "Armed Robbery" names a specific violent crime as the threat.
  13. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specifically named crime hazard.
  14. present: "Armed Robbery" names a specific crime involving a weapon.
  15. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific violent crime hazard.
  16. present: "Armed Robbery" is an explicitly named crime hazard.
  17. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific named crime and threat.
  18. present: "Armed Robbery" names the specific crime and threat.
  19. present: "Armed Robbery" is an explicitly named criminal hazard.
  20. present: "Armed Robbery reported" is an explicit, specific crime hazard.
  21. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific crime involving a weapon, clearly a named hazard.
  22. present: "Armed Robbery reported" is a specific crime and threat.
  23. present: "Armed Robbery" is explicitly named as the threat.
  24. present: "Armed Robbery" is an explicit criminal hazard.
  25. present: "Armed Robbery" is a specific, named crime.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The crime is located at block level, "on the 1800 block of N 13th St".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The location "1800 block of N 13th St" is precise.
  2. present: It gives a block level location: "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  3. present: It specifies "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  4. present: "the 1800 block of N 13th St" is a precise street location.
  5. present: It gives "the 1800 block of N 13th St" as the location.
  6. present: It specifies "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  7. present: The place is given as "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  8. present: It is placed "on the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  9. present: The place is given as "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  10. present: The location is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  11. present: The location given is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  12. present: The location is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  13. present: The crime is placed "on the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  14. present: It specifies "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  15. present: It names "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  16. present: It locates the incident on "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  17. present: The place is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  18. present: The location given is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  19. present: "the 1800 block of N 13th St" is a precise location.
  20. present: The site is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  21. present: The crime is placed "on the 1800 block of N 13th St", a precise block.
  22. present: The alert locates it on "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  23. present: "the 1800 block of N 13th St" is a precise location.
  24. present: The location is "the 1800 block of N 13th St".
  25. present: The "1800 block of N 13th St" is a precise location.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Present, 25 of 25. The alert directs a protective response in two short commands, "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." directs a protective response.
  2. present: Recipients are instructed to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  3. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs recipients on protective behavior.
  4. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs recipients what to do.
  5. present: The instructions "Use caution" and "Avoid the area" tell recipients what to do.
  6. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what to do.
  7. present: Recipients are instructed to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  8. present: Recipients are told to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  9. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." are protective instructions to the recipient.
  10. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what to do.
  11. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." directs protective behavior.
  12. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells readers exactly what to do.
  13. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what protective steps to take.
  14. present: The protective instructions "Use caution" and "Avoid the area" are given.
  15. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs recipients directly.
  16. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what to do.
  17. present: It instructs readers to use caution and avoid the area.
  18. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tell recipients how to protect themselves.
  19. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what to do.
  20. present: It instructs recipients to "Use caution" and "Avoid the area".
  21. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." instructs recipients on what to do.
  22. present: Readers are instructed to use caution and to avoid the area.
  23. present: Recipients are instructed to use caution and avoid the area.
  24. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." gives recipients protective direction.
  25. present: "Use caution. Avoid the area." tells recipients what to do.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. Neither a clock time nor a date nor a recency marker appears, leaving the timing of the armed robbery unstated.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No time reference of any kind accompanies the report.
  2. absent: Neither a clock time nor any recency marker appears.
  3. absent: Nothing indicates when the robbery happened or how recent it is.
  4. absent: No time, date, or word such as "now" appears.
  5. absent: The message carries no timestamp or recency language.
  6. absent: No time reference or recency cue is present.
  7. absent: No time reference of any kind accompanies the report.
  8. absent: Nothing in the text conveys when this happened.
  9. absent: No clock time or recency language appears in the message.
  10. absent: The alert carries no time, date, or recency marker.
  11. absent: No time element, date, or recency cue is present.
  12. absent: No time, date, or recency language is present.
  13. absent: No time reference of any kind accompanies the report.
  14. absent: The alert contains no timestamp or recency marker.
  15. absent: The message contains no time, date, or recency cue.
  16. absent: The alert carries no time reference at all.
  17. absent: No timing information of any kind is given.
  18. absent: No time reference or recency cue appears.
  19. absent: Neither a clock time nor a recency cue appears.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word appears.
  21. absent: No clock time, date or recency indicator accompanies the report.
  22. absent: Neither a clock time nor a recency word appears.
  23. absent: No clock time or recency cue is present anywhere in the text.
  24. absent: No time reference of any kind appears.
  25. absent: No time reference or recency cue is present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Absent, 0 of 25. No injury, weapon discharge or ongoing risk is described, so the message states no consequence or severity.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No harm, injury risk, or severity is described in the wording.
  2. absent: No consequence or severity statement accompanies the robbery report.
  3. absent: Despite the word armed, no consequence or harm to people is stated.
  4. absent: The alert states no harm, injury, or degree of danger.
  5. absent: No potential consequence or severity is expressed.
  6. absent: The message states no consequence or severity beyond naming the crime.
  7. absent: The alert does not describe what harm the armed suspect could cause.
  8. absent: No injury, weapon threat detail, or severity statement is given.
  9. absent: No statement of harm or severity accompanies the report.
  10. absent: It does not describe any harm or ongoing danger from the robbery.
  11. absent: No severity or outcome, such as injury or weapon use, is described.
  12. absent: The alert states no consequence, injury, or degree of danger.
  13. absent: The presence of a weapon is implied by armed, but no consequence is stated.
  14. absent: No harm, injury, or severity statement is included.
  15. absent: No statement of danger level or possible harm is included.
  16. absent: Beyond naming an armed robbery, no consequence or severity is stated.
  17. absent: No statement of danger or potential harm accompanies the report.
  18. absent: The message stops at the hazard name without describing possible harm.
  19. absent: The presence of a weapon is implied by "armed" but no consequence is stated.
  20. absent: The alert does not say what risk the armed robber poses to readers.
  21. absent: The message stops at naming the robbery and says nothing about risk to readers.
  22. absent: The consequence or severity of the armed robbery is never described.
  23. absent: Beyond the word armed, no consequence or severity statement is made.
  24. absent: The message does not describe potential harm or seriousness.
  25. absent: The alert does not describe any potential harm to readers.