Room burglary with an indecent assault, suspect not located

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The opening words use the branded TXST Timely Warning signature and name UPD as the responding agency.
  2. present: The closing words carry the TXST Timely Warning brand and name UPD as the responding police agency.
  3. present: Who sends it is marked by the TXST Timely Warning tag and by UPD as the responding police.
  4. present: A recipient sees the TXST Timely Warning brand and the UPD agency name, which identifies who issued the notice.
  5. present: The hazard noun arrives under the branded tag TXST Timely Warning, and UPD is the named responding agency.
  6. present: The place named Cypress Hall is the scene, while TXST Timely Warning and UPD identify who issued the notice.
  7. present: A clock near 7:30 a.m. follows the opening sender tag TXST Timely Warning and the agency UPD.
  8. present: Harm is sourced by the branded TXST Timely Warning tag and by UPD as the responding police agency.
  9. present: The signature begins with the branded tag TXST Timely Warning and identifies UPD as the responding agency.
  10. present: I count the TXST Timely Warning tag and UPD as the branded sender and responding police authority.
  11. present: Reading the line, TXST Timely Warning is the branded sender and UPD is the named police agency.
  12. present: The deciding words are TXST Timely Warning and UPD, which mark the branded notice and the responding police.
  13. present: What settles this is the branded opener TXST Timely Warning plus UPD as the responding police authority.
  14. present: On this text TXST Timely Warning is a branded signature and UPD names the responding police department.
  15. present: For this element TXST Timely Warning brands the sender and UPD names the police who responded.
  16. present: The message opens with the branded tag TXST Timely Warning and names UPD as the agency that responded.
  17. present: Recipients see the branded opening TXST Timely Warning and the named responding agency UPD.
  18. present: The wording opens with the branded tag TXST Timely Warning and names UPD as the agency that responded.
  19. present: A reader sees the branded tag TXST Timely Warning and the responding agency UPD, which identify the sender.
  20. present: The alert opens with the TXST Timely Warning label and names UPD as the responding police.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, TXST Timely Warning and UPD identify the branded sender and the police.
  22. present: The phrase "TXST Timely Warning" works as a branded signature, and UPD names the police who responded.
  23. present: This one opens with the label TXST Timely Warning and names UPD as the unit that responded.
  24. present: Judged from the text, the branded opening TXST Timely Warning and the named agency UPD identify who issued the notice.
  25. present: My read is that TXST Timely Warning is a branded warning and UPD names the responding police, so source is present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The opening words report a burglary and an indecent assault, both specific crimes rather than an unnamed emergency.
  2. present: The closing words name burglary and indecent assault, which are specific hazards rather than a generic incident.
  3. present: Who sends it states a burglary and an indecent assault, two specific crimes rather than a generic incident.
  4. present: A recipient is told of a burglary and an indecent assault, which names the crimes rather than a vague incident.
  5. present: The hazard noun is a burglary and an indecent assault, both named crimes rather than a vague incident.
  6. present: The place named Cypress Hall is where a burglary and indecent assault are reported, naming the hazard.
  7. present: A clock near 7:30 a.m. is attached to named crimes, burglary and indecent assault, not a generic incident.
  8. present: Harm is specified as a burglary and an indecent assault, both named threats rather than a vague incident.
  9. present: The signature names two concrete threats, a burglary and an indecent assault, not a vague incident.
  10. present: I count burglary and indecent assault as the specific crimes named in this timely warning.
  11. present: Reading the line, burglary and indecent assault name the specific crimes rather than a vague incident.
  12. present: The deciding words are burglary and indecent assault, which name the two specific offenses being reported.
  13. present: What settles this is burglary and indecent assault, two named crimes rather than a generic incident label.
  14. present: On this text a burglary and an indecent assault are the specific crimes in the timely warning.
  15. present: For this element burglary and indecent assault name the specific crimes in the report.
  16. present: The message states a burglary and an indecent assault, which are specific crimes rather than a generic incident.
  17. present: Recipients learn the specific threats named in the warning are a burglary and an indecent assault.
  18. present: The wording specifies a burglary and an indecent assault, which are named crimes rather than a generic incident.
  19. present: A reader sees burglary and indecent assault named as the specific crimes in the timely warning.
  20. present: The alert reports a burglary and an indecent assault, both specific named threats.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, burglary and indecent assault name the specific crimes that were reported.
  22. present: The phrase "burglary & indecent assault" names two concrete crimes rather than a vague emergency or incident.
  23. present: This one names a burglary and an indecent assault, and says the suspect was not located.
  24. present: Judged from the text, burglary and indecent assault are the specific crimes reported, so the hazard is named.
  25. present: My read is that burglary and indecent assault name the specific crimes, so the hazard element is present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The opening words locate the incident at Cypress Hall, a named hall, not merely the area officers searched.
  2. present: The closing words place the report at Cypress Hall, a named residence, rather than only saying the area.
  3. present: Who sends it locates the report at Cypress Hall, a named residence hall on the campus.
  4. present: A recipient is pointed to Cypress Hall, a named residence, rather than left with only the area searched.
  5. present: The hazard noun is placed at Cypress Hall, a named residence, where someone entered an unsecured room.
  6. present: The place named Cypress Hall is a specific building, which satisfies location beyond a bare campus mention.
  7. present: A clock near 7:30 a.m. locates the report at Cypress Hall, which is a specific named building.
  8. present: Harm is located at Cypress Hall, a named residential building where the reported crimes occurred.
  9. present: The signature puts the event at Cypress Hall after entry into an unsecured residential room.
  10. present: I count Cypress Hall as the named residential building where the reported crimes occurred.
  11. present: Reading the line, Cypress Hall is the named hall where the reported crimes took place.
  12. present: The deciding words are Cypress Hall, which names the building where the reported entry happened.
  13. present: What settles this is Cypress Hall, a named hall where the room was entered, which makes the place specific.
  14. present: On this text Cypress Hall and an unsecured residential room say where the reported entry happened.
  15. present: For this element Cypress Hall is a proper building name that fixes where the entry happened.
  16. present: The message locates the report at Cypress Hall and adds that a residential room was entered.
  17. present: Recipients are directed to Cypress Hall, a named place, where a residential room was entered.
  18. present: The wording locates the report at Cypress Hall and adds that entry was into a residential room.
  19. present: A reader sees Cypress Hall named as the hall where the reported crimes occurred.
  20. present: The alert locates the reported crimes at Cypress Hall, a named campus building.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, Cypress Hall names the residential building where the reported incident occurred.
  22. present: The phrase "Cypress Hall" names the hall, and "unsecured residential room" specifies the room that was entered.
  23. present: This one names Cypress Hall and an unsecured residential room as the place of the report.
  24. present: Judged from the text, Cypress Hall is the named building, and the entry was into an unsecured residential room there.
  25. present: My read is that Cypress Hall is a named hall where the report occurred, so location is present.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The opening words describe the police search and an unfound suspect, without telling recipients to avoid, lock, or call.
  2. absent: The closing words describe a search and an ongoing investigation but never tell recipients what protective action to take.
  3. absent: Who sends it describes officers searching and an ongoing investigation, not a do-this instruction for recipients.
  4. absent: A recipient reads that officers searched and a room was unsecured, but gets no avoid, lock, or shelter order.
  5. absent: The hazard noun notes that officers searched and the suspect was not located, which is responder activity, not a protective instruction.
  6. absent: The place named is searched by officers, but that describes responders and gives recipients no protective order.
  7. absent: A clock near 7:30 a.m. sits with a search update and no order to avoid, lock, or shelter.
  8. absent: Harm is not paired with a protective instruction, because a search by officers only reports what responders did.
  9. absent: The signature tells what officers did and that the investigation is ongoing, never what recipients should do.
  10. absent: I count officer search notes and an ongoing investigation as responder activity, not a protective instruction.
  11. absent: Reading the line, officers searched and the case is ongoing, but no protective step is required of readers.
  12. absent: The deciding words are Officers searched the area, which tells what police did and not what recipients should do.
  13. absent: What settles this is officers searching and an ongoing investigation, which describes police work and gives no recipient instruction.
  14. absent: On this text officers searched and the suspect was not located, which reports police work rather than instructions.
  15. absent: For this element officers searching and an ongoing investigation describe police work, not a step for readers.
  16. absent: The message describes officers searching and an ongoing investigation, without instructing recipients to avoid, lock, shelter, or call.
  17. absent: Recipients are not instructed to avoid the hall, lock doors, or take any protective action.
  18. absent: The wording describes officers searching and an ongoing investigation, which reports police activity rather than telling recipients what to do.
  19. absent: A reader sees officers searched and a suspect was not located, which describes police work rather than a recipient action.
  20. absent: The alert describes officers searching and an ongoing investigation, not an action recipients should take.
  21. absent: Looking at the sentence, it never tells recipients to get to safety or to call for help.
  22. absent: The phrase "Officers searched the area" describes the police search and gives recipients no protective instruction.
  23. absent: This one describes the police search and ongoing investigation without telling readers how to protect themselves.
  24. absent: Judged from the text, officers searching and an ongoing investigation describe responder activity, not a protective action for recipients.
  25. absent: My read is that officers searching and an ongoing investigation describe police work, not a protective instruction, so guidance is absent.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  25 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The opening words give about 7:30 a.m. as the incident clock and add that the investigation is ongoing.
  2. present: The closing words include both the clock time of about 7:30 a.m. and the statement that investigation is ongoing.
  3. present: Who sends it includes a clock time of about 7:30 a.m. on October 11, 2026.
  4. present: A recipient is given about 7:30 a.m. and told the investigation is ongoing, which is a clock plus recency.
  5. present: The hazard noun is fixed to Oct 11, 2026, at about 7:30 a.m., which is a clock time.
  6. present: The place named is tied to the clock time of about 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11, 2026.
  7. present: A clock near 7:30 a.m. gives an approximate morning hour, so Oct 11 is not date only.
  8. present: Harm is anchored to a clock of about 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11, 2026, with the investigation still ongoing.
  9. present: The signature dates the report Oct 11, 2026, at about 7:30 a.m. and marks the investigation as ongoing.
  10. present: I count the approximate clock time 7:30 am on Oct 11, 2026, which is more than a date.
  11. present: Reading the line, about 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11 is a clock time, so when is stated.
  12. present: The deciding words are Oct 11, 2026, at 7:30 a.m., which gives the date and the approximate clock time.
  13. present: What settles this is the approximate clock 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11, which is a time and not a date alone.
  14. present: On this text Oct 11, 2026 at about 7:30 a.m. gives the date and clock time, and the investigation is ongoing.
  15. present: For this element about 7:30 a.m. on October 11 is a clock time for the reported entry.
  16. present: The message times the report to Oct 11, 2026, at about 7:30 a.m. and says the investigation is ongoing.
  17. present: Recipients read the clock time about 7:30 AM on Oct 11, 2026, with the investigation still ongoing.
  18. present: The wording timestamps the report at about 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11, 2026 and says the investigation is ongoing.
  19. present: A reader sees the clock time of about 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11, 2026, which dates the incident.
  20. present: The alert gives the time as about 7:30 a.m. on Oct 11, 2026, and calls the investigation ongoing.
  21. present: Looking at the sentence, Oct 11, 2026 at about 7:30 a.m. gives the incident clock time.
  22. present: The phrase "Oct 11, 2026, at ~7:30 a.m." records both the calendar date and an approximate clock time.
  23. present: This one includes a clock time of about 7:30 a.m. on October 11, 2026.
  24. present: Judged from the text, the report is placed on Oct 11, 2026, at about 7:30 am, and the investigation is ongoing.
  25. present: My read is that Oct 11, 2026 at about 7:30 a.m. is a clock time, so the time element is present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  0 of 25 passes marked this element present.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The opening words name the crimes and an unsecured room entry, but they add no harm or severity past those labels.
  2. absent: The closing words name the crimes and an unsecured room entry but state no further harm or severity.
  3. absent: Who sends it names burglary and indecent assault, and the crime names alone do not add extra harm language.
  4. absent: A recipient is not told of injury, loss, or harm beyond the burglary and indecent assault names themselves.
  5. absent: The hazard noun names burglary and indecent assault but adds no injury, weapon, or other harm past those labels.
  6. absent: The place named saw a burglary and indecent assault, yet no further harm word such as injury appears.
  7. absent: A clock near 7:30 a.m. says the suspect was not located but states no injury, weapon, or added severity.
  8. absent: Harm is not given any consequence or severity, since burglary and indecent assault are hazard names alone.
  9. absent: The signature records the crimes and an unlocated suspect, but no injury, danger, or stated severity appears.
  10. absent: I count burglary and indecent assault as hazard names only, with no added harm or severity statement.
  11. absent: Reading the line, entry into an unsecured room restates the burglary without any further harm written.
  12. absent: The deciding words are burglary and indecent assault, which name offenses but give no separate severity or harm.
  13. absent: What settles this is the bare crime labels burglary and indecent assault, without any added consequence such as injury.
  14. absent: On this text no injury, weapon, or further harm is described beyond naming the burglary and assault.
  15. absent: For this element the suspect was not located, yet no injury or severity word goes past the crime names.
  16. absent: The message names the crimes and an unlocated suspect, but it states no injury, weapon, danger, or other harm.
  17. absent: Recipients hear no statement of injury or property damage, and not located does not supply impact.
  18. absent: The wording names the crimes and an unsecured room but never states injury, danger, or another consequence beyond the offense labels.
  19. absent: A reader sees an individual entered an unsecured room, which restates the burglary rather than a further consequence.
  20. absent: The alert names the crimes and an unlocated suspect but states no injury, danger, or severity.
  21. absent: Looking at the sentence, suspect not located does not by itself describe injury, danger, or damage.
  22. absent: The phrase "indecent assault" names the offense but adds no statement that anyone was hurt or remains in danger.
  23. absent: This one names the crimes but does not state injury, loss, or harm beyond those names.
  24. absent: Judged from the text, naming the crimes and an unlocated suspect does not state injury, danger, or other consequence.
  25. absent: My read is that burglary and indecent assault are hazard names without a separate harm or severity statement, so impact is absent.