Skip to content
Campus Alert Archive
Tufts

"At 10:31 a.m.": Tufts Gets the Email Telling It Rumeysa Öztürk's SEVIS Record Was Terminated — Twelve Hours After ICE Arrested Her

MAotheradvisoryhigh confidence
Confirmed Threat

On March 26, 2025 at 10:31 a.m. EDT, Tufts University's International Center received an email from the State Department stating that Rumeysa Öztürk's F-1 visa had been revoked on grounds that she was a "non-immigrant status violator" and/or that her presence in the United States would result in "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences." The notification was the institution's first knowledge that Öztürk's SEVIS record had been terminated the prior evening at 7:32 p.m. — twelve hours after plainclothes ICE officers arrested her outside her Somerville, Massachusetts apartment. Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student in Tufts' Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, had co-authored a March 2024 op-ed in The Tufts Daily criticizing the university's response to the war in Gaza.

Alerts
2
Response
Killed
0
Injured
0
Institution
Tufts University
Private R1 · MA
~13,000 studentsTufts International Center / President's Office Communication
Confirmed Timeline

Alert Sequence

2 messages in sequence

Some alert texts below are approximate reconstructions from news coverage, not confirmed verbatim transcripts. Reconstructed texts are shown in italic with a dashed border. Verified verbatim texts have a solid border and are marked accordingly.

INITIAL ALERTEmail
Dear Designated School Official, The Bureau of Consular Affairs of the U.S. Department of State is notifying you that on March 21, 2025, the F-1 nonimmigrant visa issued to Rumeysa Öztürk (DS-160 application reference associated with passport [redacted]) was revoked by the Secretary of State. The basis for this revocation is that the visa holder has been identified as a non-immigrant status violator and/or that the visa holder's continued presence in the United States would result in potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States, pursuant to Section 237(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The associated SEVIS record (N00[redacted]) has been terminated effective March 25, 2025. The visa holder is no longer authorized to remain in the United States in F-1 nonimmigrant status, and any post-completion or pre-completion Optional Practical Training authorization is also terminated. This notification is provided to you in your capacity as Designated School Official under 8 CFR 214.3(g). Please update your records accordingly.

This text has been reconstructed from news coverage and may not reflect the exact original wording.

The 10:31 a.m. arrival timestamp is unusually well-documented for this category of notification because the ACLU's habeas filing in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered the email metadata into the record as part of arguing that Tufts (and Öztürk) received no advance notice — Öztürk had been arrested at 5:30 p.m. the previous evening, nearly 17 hours before the institution was told of the visa revocation
The foreign-policy-consequences ground under INA 237(a)(4)(C)(i) was a key legal innovation of the 2025 enforcement campaign: it is a rarely-invoked deportability ground that does not require any criminal conduct, only a determination by the Secretary of State that the noncitizen's presence has 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences' — a determination that courts have historically treated as nearly unreviewable
Tufts' International Center receives SEVIS notifications in its Designated School Official capacity under 8 CFR 214.3(g) — the same regulatory framework that authorizes universities to issue I-20 forms; this case revealed that DHS and the State Department can terminate records through that channel without consulting the institution
The timing (notification arrived after the arrest, not before) is the single most-litigated detail of the Öztürk case and is what the ACLU has used to argue that the entire SEVIS process was bypassed for political reasons
FOLLOW-UPWebsite+7d
University Declaration for Rümeysa Öztürk Rümeysa Öztürk is a doctoral student in good standing in Tufts University's Department of Child Study and Human Development. She has been a member of our community since she arrived from Turkey on a Fulbright Scholarship in 2018 to begin her master's degree, and has continued her academic work at Tufts as a doctoral student researching how children develop relationships with social media and digital technology. On the evening of March 25, 2025, Rumeysa was taken into custody by plainclothes officers of the Department of Homeland Security as she was walking from her off-campus apartment in Somerville, Massachusetts to attend an iftar dinner. Video of her detention has been widely seen. The University was not contacted in advance of her detention. The University's first notice that Rumeysa's F-1 visa had been revoked, and her associated SEVIS record terminated, was an email received from the Bureau of Consular Affairs at 10:31 a.m. on March 26 — nearly seventeen hours after her arrest. The University is not aware of any allegation that Rumeysa has engaged in unlawful activity. Her co-authorship in March 2024 of an op-ed in The Tufts Daily — which expressed her views about Tufts' response to the war in Gaza — appears to be the only basis for the government's actions. Expression of opinion through a student newspaper is protected speech. Tufts University will submit this declaration, along with a sworn affidavit, to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in support of Rumeysa's habeas petition. We continue to support Rumeysa, her family, and her academic department, and we ask that she be returned to our community without delay.

This text has been reconstructed from news coverage and may not reflect the exact original wording.

The Declaration's explicit identification of the March 2024 op-ed as 'the only basis' for the government's actions is the institutional version of the legal argument the ACLU advanced in court — that Öztürk's case represented First Amendment retaliation rather than a national-security determination
Tufts' decision to submit a sworn affidavit alongside the Declaration is unusual institutional behavior: most universities in 2025 declined to take adversarial postures in federal court against the federal government for fear of retaliation under SEVP authority. President Kumar's affidavit was widely cited as setting a precedent for institutional defense of detained students
The Declaration was published on the President's website rather than emailed to the campus community, framing it as a public legal document rather than an internal communication — a deliberate choice that maximized its citability and the institutional commitment it represented
The phrase 'the University was not contacted in advance of her detention' echoes the practice-defining narrative that emerged across institutions in April 2025: DHS conducted SEVIS terminations and ICE detentions without notifying the universities serving as Designated School Officials
Context

Background

Rumeysa Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University's Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, was arrested by plainclothes ICE officers at approximately 5:30 p.m. on March 25, 2025 as she walked from her Somerville, Massachusetts apartment to an iftar dinner during Ramadan. Surveillance video of her arrest circulated widely and became one of the defining images of the 2025 international-student enforcement campaign. Her F-1 visa had been revoked four days earlier on March 21 without notice to her or to Tufts. Her SEVIS record was terminated at 7:32 p.m. on March 25 — approximately two hours after the arrest. Tufts University's International Center first learned of the SEVIS termination at 10:31 a.m. on March 26, 2025, via email from the Bureau of Consular Affairs to the Designated School Official — nearly seventeen hours after Öztürk's detention. The case became the legal flashpoint of the spring 2025 SEVIS wave because it was explicitly tied to protected First Amendment expression: the only government-cited basis for the revocation was her March 2024 co-authorship of a Tufts Daily op-ed criticizing the university's response to the war in Gaza. On April 2, 2025, Tufts President Sunil Kumar published a public University Declaration defending Öztürk and submitted a sworn affidavit to the federal court hearing her habeas case — an unusual institutional defense at a moment when peer presidents were declining to take adversarial postures against the federal government. After more than six weeks in a Louisiana ICE detention facility, Öztürk was released on a federal court order. On December 9, 2025 a federal judge ordered DHS to restore her SEVIS record. On February 9, 2026 an immigration judge terminated her removal proceedings. On April 17, 2026 Öztürk announced a settlement with the U.S. government and her return to Turkey. Tufts' two communications — the inbound SEVIS notification email of March 26, 2025 and the outbound University Declaration of April 2, 2025 — bookend a case that established the legal and institutional shape of the 2025 SEVIS enforcement wave.
Analysis

Key Findings

The Öztürk case is the best-documented instance in 2025 of a SEVIS notification arriving after the student was already detained — the 10:31 a.m. March 26 timestamp on the Tufts email arrived nearly seventeen hours after the 5:30 p.m. March 25 arrest, reversing the normal sequence in which institutional notification precedes any enforcement action
The State Department's invocation of INA 237(a)(4)(C)(i) (the 'foreign policy consequences' deportability ground) is the legally distinctive feature of the 2025 enforcement campaign: it does not require criminal conduct, only a Secretary of State determination, and courts have historically treated such determinations as nearly unreviewable — making it the most consequential immigration-law tool of the year
President Sunil Kumar's April 2 University Declaration, with its sworn affidavit, set a precedent for institutional defense of detained students at a moment when most peer presidents declined to take adversarial postures against the federal government — and his framing of Öztürk's op-ed as 'protected speech' became the template for institutional defenses in subsequent cases
The Öztürk timeline (arrest → SEVIS termination → institutional notification → arrest video circulation → University Declaration → federal court intervention → settlement) became the legal blueprint that subsequent detained-student cases followed; her experience shaped institutional policy responses well beyond Tufts and Massachusetts
Outcome
Öztürk was detained for [over six weeks at a Louisiana ICE facility](https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/09/us/immigration-tufts-student-detained) before a federal court ordered her release. On April 2, 2025, [Tufts President Sunil Kumar issued a public University Declaration](https://www.tufts.edu/president/speeches-and-messages/04022025-university-declaration-for-rumeysa-ozturk) defending Öztürk and submitting a sworn affidavit to the federal court hearing her habeas case. On December 9, 2025, a federal judge [ordered the Trump administration to restore her SEVIS record](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/9/us-court-orders-trump-admin-to-restore-rumeysa-ozturks-legal-status). On April 17, 2026, [Öztürk announced a settlement with the U.S. government](https://www.wgbh.org/news/local/2026-04-17/rumeysa-ozturk-says-she-has-settled-with-us-government-and-will-return-to-turkey) and her return to Turkey.
Provenance

Sources

  1. Official
  2. Report
  3. News
  4. national media
  5. national media
  6. national media
  7. News
Tags
sevis-terminationvisa-revocationice-detentionimmigration-advisoryinternational-studentsf-1fulbrightfirst-amendmentina-237foreign-policy-groundsmassachusettsprivate-r1tuftsrumeysa-ozturktrump-administrationhabeas-corpus
Added May 2026Updated May 2026Via ingestion