Forced entry at the T-31 Cottage by the Martin Johnson house
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedUC San Diego Police issued a Clery timely warning after a burglary at the T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house at Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Police received a trespassing report at 6:31 a.m. October 23. The official window is 4:00 p.m. October 22 through 6:30 p.m. October 23. Around 11:20 a.m. October 23 staff found items missing and an officer found evidence of forced entry.
- Alerts
- 1
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT October 23, 2025 ALL ACADEMICS, STAFF, AND STUDENTS AT UC SAN DIEGO Timely Warning – Burglary On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM, the UC San Diego Police Department received a report of a trespassing which occurred at the T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house, at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography. At that time, there was no evidence of forced entry. The suspect most likely gained entry to the location sometime between 04:00 PM on 10/22/2025 and 06:30 PM on 10/23/2025. Around 11:20 AM on 10/23/25, staff discovered items were missing and the investigating officer found evidence of forced entry. The suspect(s) entered the building and rummaged through different rooms. If you observe any further suspicious behavior or become aware of additional incidents, please contact the UC San Diego Police Department immediately. There is no suspect information at this time. At this time, the suspect(s) is/are not in custody. The report is currently under investigation by the UC San Diego Police Department. If you have information that could be helpful in this investigation, please call the UC San Diego Police Department at (858) 534-4357 or submit an online tip at https://police.ucsd.edu/services/anonymous.html. If you are the victim of a burglary or you discover someone inside your residence: If possible, immediately leave your residence and go to a safe area (e.g., a neighbor’s apartment or a public place). Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1. If you are unable to leave your residence, secure yourself and your family members in a safe location, turn on all available lights, and call the police immediately. To help reduce the risk of being the victim of a burglary: Make sure doors and windows are closed and locked. When it is hot out, use a lock or item that only allows the window to open small distances. If you live on campus and your windows or doors won’t lock, please call Housing Maintenance at (858) 534-2600. If your office windows or doors will not lock, please contact Facilities Management Customer Relations help desk, phone (858) 534-2930. Be aware of your surroundings. If you see suspicious activity, call or text the UC San Diego Police Department immediately at 9-1-1. Know the location of campus emergency telephones on routes to and from campus destinations. Avoid displaying and/or placing high-value items close to windows. Items such as computers, cell phones, wallets, and purses can be easily grabbed from open windows and may be incentives for criminals to try and enter the residence. Secure your valuables at all times. Be alert and aware. Pay attention to who is around when you leave and return to your residence or office. If returning at night, leave a light on inside as a visual deterrent. What is this Notice? This notice is being provided to you to comply with the Jeanne Clery Campus Safety Act. Timely Warnings are intended to prevent similar crimes and to provide information that will assist community members in protecting themselves. University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093
Sourcepresent25/25
Final assessment
UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT is the branded sender.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: A first-time reader would see "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: The body names it with "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: Because the alert says "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "UC SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT" is on the page, so present.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
trespassing then forced entry and missing items name a burglary hazard.
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "a report of a trespassing", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "a report of a trespassing" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "a report of a trespassing" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "a report of a trespassing".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "a report of a trespassing" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "a report of a trespassing", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "a report of a trespassing" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "a report of a trespassing".
- present: A first-time reader would see "a report of a trespassing" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "a report of a trespassing".
- present: The body names it with "a report of a trespassing", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "a report of a trespassing".
- present: Because the alert says "a report of a trespassing", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "a report of a trespassing" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "a report of a trespassing" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "a report of a trespassing" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "a report of a trespassing" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "a report of a trespassing" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "a report of a trespassing" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "a report of a trespassing" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "a report of a trespassing".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "a report of a trespassing".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "a report of a trespassing" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "a report of a trespassing" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "a report of a trespassing" is on the page, so present.
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house at Scripps is a named place.
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house".
- present: A first-time reader would see "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house".
- present: The body names it with "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house".
- present: Because the alert says "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "T-31 Cottage adjacent to the Martin Johnson house" is on the page, so present.
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Victims are told to leave if possible and to call or text police at 9-1-1.
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: A first-time reader would see "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: The body names it with "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: Because the alert says "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "Call or text the UC San Diego Police Department at 9-1-1" is on the page, so present.
Timepresent25/25
Final assessment
On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM is an explicit clock time and date.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM".
- present: A first-time reader would see "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM".
- present: The body names it with "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM".
- present: Because the alert says "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "On October 23, 2025 at 06:31 AM" is on the page, so present.
Impactpresent25/25
Final assessment
staff discovered items were missing states completed property loss.
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: The deciding words are "staff discovered items were missing", so this element is present.
- present: This read treats "staff discovered items were missing" as enough to mark the element present.
- present: Quoted evidence "staff discovered items were missing" is the specific language that carries the element.
- present: I mark present because the alert includes "staff discovered items were missing".
- present: Presence follows from the phrase "staff discovered items were missing" in the body.
- present: The message supplies "staff discovered items were missing", which satisfies the element on this pass.
- present: On this independent read, "staff discovered items were missing" is the hook that makes the element present.
- present: Element is present: the text itself contains "staff discovered items were missing".
- present: A first-time reader would see "staff discovered items were missing" and know the element is there.
- present: Coding present from the explicit wording "staff discovered items were missing".
- present: The body names it with "staff discovered items were missing", so the vote is present.
- present: This pass votes present on the strength of "staff discovered items were missing".
- present: Because the alert says "staff discovered items were missing", the element is not missing.
- present: The quoted span "staff discovered items were missing" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
- present: Present: "staff discovered items were missing" is in the transmitted text.
- present: I am scoring present after locating "staff discovered items were missing" in the message.
- present: The element is carried by "staff discovered items were missing" rather than by implication alone.
- present: Direct language "staff discovered items were missing" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
- present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "staff discovered items were missing" as the present cue.
- present: This reviewer finds "staff discovered items were missing" and therefore records present.
- present: The alert is not silent here: it has "staff discovered items were missing".
- present: Present vote rests on the visible words "staff discovered items were missing".
- present: From the four corners of the message, "staff discovered items were missing" establishes the element.
- present: I quote "staff discovered items were missing" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
- present: Independent judgment: "staff discovered items were missing" is on the page, so present.
Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Official
Campus Alert Archive. "University of California, San Diego: Forced entry at the T-31 Cottage by the Martin Johnson house." Incident of October 22, 2025. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/uc-san-diego-scripps-t31-cottage-burglary-2025-10-22/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.