Stay-in-place for armed robbery near CVS at Corry

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found S present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  2. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  3. present: The tag "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies who is sending and responding.
  4. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag and "Police" names the responding agency.
  5. present: Sender is marked as "UC Emergency" and "Police" are identified as responders.
  6. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  7. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" names the sender and responding authority.
  8. present: The message is signed "UC Emergency" and attributes response to "Police".
  9. present: The message is signed "UC Emergency" and attributes response to "Police".
  10. present: The signature UC Emergency identifies the sender, and Police names the responding authority.
  11. present: The sender tag "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify who is issuing and responding.
  12. present: The signature "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify who is sending and responding.
  13. present: The message opens with "UC Emergency" and names "Police" as the responding authority.
  14. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the issuing authority.
  15. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag and "Police" names the responding agency.
  16. present: The message starts with "UC Emergency" and attributes response to "Police".
  17. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded alert signature, and "Police" identifies the issuing responders.
  18. present: The tag "UC Emergency" plus "Police" names who is issuing and responding.
  19. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag and "Police" names the responding agency.
  20. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" and the word "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  21. present: The message opens with branded "UC Emergency-" and cites "Police" as the authority.
  22. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature, and "Police" names the responding agency.
  23. present: The branded opener "UC Emergency" plus "Police" identifies the sender and responding authority.
  24. present: The line starts with "UC Emergency" and cites "Police" as the authority responding.
  25. present: The prefix "UC Emergency-" plus "Police" names who is issuing the alert and who is responding.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found H absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It only says an "emergency reported", which is a generic label and names no specific threat.
  2. absent: It only says "emergency reported", a generic label that names no specific threat.
  3. absent: "Emergency reported" does not identify a specific threat type.
  4. absent: "Emergency reported" is generic and does not specify the threat type.
  5. absent: "emergency reported" does not specify shots, fire, robbery, or any other named hazard.
  6. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic label that does not name a specific threat.
  7. absent: It only says "emergency reported", which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  8. absent: "emergency reported" does not specify a threat type such as robbery or shots fired.
  9. absent: "emergency reported" does not specify the hazard beyond a generic incident label.
  10. absent: The phrase emergency reported is generic and does not specify the threat type.
  11. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not specify the threat type.
  12. absent: "Emergency reported" is generic and does not specify the threat type.
  13. absent: The text calls it an "emergency" only, which the rubric treats as too generic to count as hazard.
  14. absent: The text only says "emergency reported" and never names a specific threat.
  15. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  16. absent: Calling it an "emergency reported" near CVS leaves the threat unnamed.
  17. absent: "emergency reported" does not specify what the threat is.
  18. absent: Only "emergency reported" appears, with no specific hazard named.
  19. absent: The only threat word is the generic "emergency", which the rubric does not treat as a named hazard.
  20. absent: The text only names an "emergency" and does not specify a threat such as robbery or an armed person.
  21. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not specify the threat type.
  22. absent: "emergency reported" is generic and does not specify the type of threat.
  23. absent: The text only says "emergency reported", a generic word that does not name a specific threat.
  24. absent: It calls the event an "emergency" only, which the rubric treats as too generic to count as a hazard.
  25. absent: Only an unspecified "emergency" is mentioned, not a concrete threat type.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found L present (25 present / 0 absent).

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The incident is placed "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  2. present: The report is placed "near CVS at Corry", a named business and street area.
  3. present: It names "near CVS at Corry", a business and street area.
  4. present: It locates the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  5. present: Locates the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  6. present: It places the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  7. present: It locates the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place.
  8. present: The site is "near CVS at Corry", a named business and street.
  9. present: It locates the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  10. present: It names a place: near CVS at Corry.
  11. present: It names a place: "near CVS at Corry".
  12. present: It names a place: "near CVS at Corry".
  13. present: It places the report "near CVS at Corry", a named business and street.
  14. present: It places the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place.
  15. present: The report is "near CVS at Corry", a named business and street.
  16. present: "near CVS at Corry" names a store and street as the place.
  17. present: Locates it "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  18. present: Location is "near CVS at Corry", a named store and street.
  19. present: It names a place: "near CVS at Corry".
  20. present: It locates the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place and street.
  21. present: It names "near CVS at Corry", a business and street location.
  22. present: Location is "near CVS at Corry", a named business and street.
  23. present: It locates the report "near CVS at Corry", a named place.
  24. present: Location is given as "near CVS at Corry", a named store and street area.
  25. present: It cites "near CVS at Corry", a named business and street.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found G present (25 present / 0 absent).

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  2. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to "stay at your location" and to "take action as needed".
  3. present: "Stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take if safe.
  4. present: "If safe, stay at your location" tells recipients to remain in place.
  5. present: Directs recipients to stay at their location if safe, which is protective guidance.
  6. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to be observant and take action as needed.
  7. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "be observant/take action as needed".
  8. present: It directs people to "stay at your location" if safe, which is a stay-put instruction.
  9. present: "stay at your location" and "Be observant/take action as needed" are protective instructions.
  10. present: It tells people to stay at their location if safe, which is stay-in-place guidance.
  11. present: "If safe, stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take.
  12. present: It tells people to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective action.
  13. present: "If safe, stay at your location" tells recipients to remain in place as a protective action.
  14. present: It tells recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  15. present: "If safe, stay at your location" is a protective-action instruction.
  16. present: "stay at your location" is a protective stay-in-place instruction to the public.
  17. present: Directs recipients to stay at their location if safe and to be observant and take action as needed.
  18. present: "If safe, stay at your location" is a protective stay instruction.
  19. present: "If safe, stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take.
  20. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe and to "take action as needed".
  21. present: "If safe, stay at your location" is a protective action directed at recipients.
  22. present: People are directed to stay at their location if safe and to be observant or take action as needed.
  23. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe, a protective action.
  24. present: "If safe, stay at your location" tells recipients what protective action to take.
  25. present: "stay at your location" and "Be observant/take action as needed" are instructions to the audience.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found T absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: "More info soon" refers to a future update, not when the incident is occurring.
  4. absent: The message has no time of day, date, or recency word such as now.
  5. absent: Nothing indicates when the report occurred; "More info soon" is not an event time.
  6. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  7. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or ongoing appears.
  8. absent: "More info soon" is a future update promise, not a when or recency marker for the event.
  9. absent: There is no clock time, date, now, immediately, or until-further-notice cue.
  10. absent: No clock time, date, now, or immediately appears in the text.
  11. absent: No clock time, date, or recency language is present.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar timing language is present.
  13. absent: No time of day, date, or recency word such as now or immediately is given.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  15. absent: No time of day, date, or recency word such as now or immediately is given.
  16. absent: "More info soon" is a promise of updates, not a when for the event.
  17. absent: Contains no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar timing language.
  18. absent: There is no clock time, date, now, or until-further-notice cue.
  19. absent: No time of day, date, or recency language such as now or until further notice is present.
  20. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, immediately, or today appears.
  21. absent: "More info soon" promises a later update and is not a when-the-hazard time cue.
  22. absent: The text has no clock time, date, now, immediately, or similar recency language.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  24. absent: No clock time, date, or recency marker for the incident is included.
  25. absent: "More info soon" is about later updates, not when the hazard is occurring.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes found I absent (0 present / 25 absent).

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unlabeled emergency itself.
  2. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity the unlabeled emergency could cause.
  3. absent: No severity or harm language is present beyond an unnamed emergency.
  4. absent: It does not say what the emergency could do or how serious it is.
  5. absent: No impact wording such as dangerous, injury, or for your safety appears.
  6. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or risk of injury.
  7. absent: Nothing states a consequence or severity beyond the unnamed emergency itself.
  8. absent: The text does not say the situation is dangerous, injurious, or otherwise consequential.
  9. absent: The text does not convey potential harm, severity, or consequences for people or property.
  10. absent: No consequence or severity language is present, only the unlabeled emergency.
  11. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond the unlabeled emergency.
  12. absent: No consequence or severity language is given beyond the unlabeled emergency.
  13. absent: Nothing describes what the emergency could do to people or property.
  14. absent: It states no consequence or severity, only that an emergency was reported.
  15. absent: The message does not describe harm, danger, or how serious the event is.
  16. absent: No injury, death, damage, or other severity language appears.
  17. absent: Does not describe what the emergency could do to people or property.
  18. absent: The text does not say what the emergency could do to people or property.
  19. absent: No consequence or severity language (for example dangerous or life-threatening) is included.
  20. absent: Nothing states consequence or severity, such as dangerous or could cause injury.
  21. absent: No consequence language such as dangerous, deadly, or risk of injury is present.
  22. absent: No severity or consequence language such as dangerous or life-threatening is present.
  23. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity beyond the generic word emergency.
  24. absent: The text does not say what the emergency could do or how serious it is.
  25. absent: No impact language such as life-threatening or for your safety is present.