Stay-in-place for armed robbery at CVS Taft and Vine

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Source present: the opening UC Emergency tag and Police identify the sender and responding authority.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag, and police are named as responding.
  2. present: UC Emergency is a branded signature and Police names the responding agency.
  3. present: The opening UC Emergency tag and the mention of Police identify the sender and responding authority.
  4. present: The UC Emergency tag and Police identify the issuing or responding authority.
  5. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag and Police are the named responders.
  6. present: The UC Emergency tag and mention of police identify the source and responders.
  7. present: The branded UC Emergency tag and Police identify the sender and responding agency.
  8. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag, and police are named as responders.
  9. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and Police is named as the responding agency.
  10. present: UC Emergency and Police identify the issuing and responding authorities.
  11. present: It opens with branded "UC Emergency" and names Police as the responders.
  12. present: The branded "UC Emergency" tag and "Police" identify the sender and responding authority.
  13. present: UC Emergency is a branded tag and Police is named as the responding authority.
  14. present: UC Emergency is a branded signature and Police names the responding agency.
  15. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag, and Police are named as the responding authority.
  16. present: "UC Emergency" identifies the alerting brand, and "Police" are named as the responding agency.
  17. present: UC Emergency is a branded tag and Police is named as the agency responding.
  18. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded signature and "Police" names the responding agency.
  19. present: The branded UC Emergency tag and the word Police identify the issuing or responding authority.
  20. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and Police is named as the responding agency.
  21. present: The UC Emergency signature and Police name the sender brand and a responding agency.
  22. present: UC Emergency is a branded sender tag, and Police names the responding agency.
  23. present: "UC Emergency" is a branded sender tag, and "Police" names the responding agency.
  24. present: The branded UC Emergency tag and Police identify the issuing and responding authority.
  25. present: The UC Emergency signature is a branded sender tag and Police are named as responding.
• Hazardabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Hazard absent: emergency reported is generic and does not name a specific threat.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: It only says emergency, which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  2. absent: It only says emergency reported, which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  3. absent: The hazard is labeled only as an emergency, which the rubric treats as too generic.
  4. absent: Emergency reported does not name a specific hazard.
  5. absent: Only a generic emergency is reported, with no specific hazard named.
  6. absent: The word emergency alone does not specify what the threat is.
  7. absent: It only says an emergency reported, which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  8. absent: Only a generic emergency is reported, with no specific threat named.
  9. absent: It only says an "emergency" was reported, which does not name a specific threat.
  10. absent: Emergency reported is generic and does not specify the threat.
  11. absent: It only says "emergency", which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  12. absent: It only reports an "emergency", which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  13. absent: Only the generic word emergency is used, with no specific threat named.
  14. absent: It only says emergency, which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  15. absent: Emergency reported is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  16. absent: "Emergency reported" does not specify a threat such as fire, assault, or a storm.
  17. absent: The hazard is labeled only as an emergency, which the rubric treats as too generic.
  18. absent: The only threat word is "emergency", which is generic and does not name a specific hazard.
  19. absent: It only says an emergency was reported, which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  20. absent: It only says "emergency", which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  21. absent: The text only says emergency and never names a specific threat such as shots fired or fire.
  22. absent: It only says an emergency was reported, which is too generic to name a specific threat.
  23. absent: It only says an "emergency reported", which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
  24. absent: It only says emergency, which does not name a specific threat.
  25. absent: It only says emergency, which is generic and does not name a specific threat.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Location present: the report is at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The report is at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  2. present: It locates the report at CVS, Taft and Vine.
  3. present: It places the report at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  4. present: It names CVS at Taft and Vine as the place.
  5. present: The site is CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  6. present: It cites CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  7. present: The report is at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  8. present: The report is at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  9. present: The report is at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  10. present: It names CVS at Taft and Vine, a specific place.
  11. present: It names CVS at Taft and Vine as the place.
  12. present: It places the report at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  13. present: The report is at CVS Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  14. present: The report is at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  15. present: The report is placed at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  16. present: The site is "CVS - Taft and Vine", a named business and intersection.
  17. present: It places the report at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  18. present: The report is at "CVS - Taft and Vine", a named place and intersection.
  19. present: It places the report at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  20. present: The report is at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  21. present: The report is at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named business and intersection.
  22. present: The report is at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named place and intersection.
  23. present: It places the report at "CVS - Taft and Vine", a named place and intersection.
  24. present: The report is at CVS, Taft and Vine, a named place and streets.
  25. present: The report is at CVS at Taft and Vine, a named store and intersection.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Guidance present: recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location and take action as needed.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It tells people to stay at their location if safe and to be observant or take action.
  2. present: It tells recipients, if safe, to stay at your location.
  3. present: Recipients are instructed, if safe, to stay at their location and take action as needed.
  4. present: It instructs people to stay at their location if safe.
  5. present: People are told to stay at their location if it is safe.
  6. present: Stay at your location if safe is a remain-in-place instruction.
  7. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location and be observant.
  8. present: It tells recipients to stay at their location if safe, a remain in place instruction.
  9. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location and be observant.
  10. present: It instructs people to stay at their location if safe and to be observant or take action as needed.
  11. present: It instructs "If safe, stay at your location", a stay in place protective action.
  12. present: It tells people, if safe, to stay at their location, a remain in place instruction.
  13. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location.
  14. present: It tells recipients, if safe, to stay at their location.
  15. present: If safe, stay at your location tells recipients to remain where they are.
  16. present: The instruction is to stay at your location if safe and take action as needed.
  17. present: Recipients are told to stay at their location if safe and to take action as needed.
  18. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location, a stay put protective action.
  19. present: It tells people to stay at their location if safe and to be observant and take action as needed.
  20. present: It tells recipients, if safe, to stay at their location.
  21. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location, which is a stay in place instruction.
  22. present: Recipients are told to stay at their location if safe and to be observant or take action as needed.
  23. present: It instructs recipients to "stay at your location" if safe.
  24. present: Recipients are told, if safe, to stay at their location and to be observant and take action as needed.
  25. present: It tells people to stay at their location if safe and to be observant or take action as needed.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Time absent: More info soon is not a recency marker for the incident, and no clock time or date is given.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: More info soon is not a time for the hazard, and no clock time or recency cue appears.
  2. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears.
  3. absent: No time of occurrence is given; More info soon is not a recency marker for the incident.
  4. absent: No time or recency wording appears.
  5. absent: More info soon is not a time of occurrence, and no now or clock time is given.
  6. absent: More info soon is not a time for the hazard itself.
  7. absent: More info soon is not a clock time, date, or recency cue for the event.
  8. absent: More info soon is not a clock time, date, or recency cue for the event.
  9. absent: "More info soon" is not a time for the event, and no clock time or recency cue appears.
  10. absent: The text has no clock time, date, or recency marker for the event.
  11. absent: More info soon is not a time for the event, and no clock time or recency cue appears.
  12. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears, and "soon" refers only to more information.
  13. absent: More info soon is not a hazard time, and no clock time or recency cue appears.
  14. absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or immediately is given.
  15. absent: More info soon is about updates, not event time, and no clock time or now appears.
  16. absent: There is no time of occurrence or recency cue, only a promise of more info soon.
  17. absent: More info soon is not a hazard time stamp, and no clock time or date is given.
  18. absent: "More info soon" refers to later updates, and no clock time, date, or event recency cue appears.
  19. absent: More info soon is not event timing, and no clock time, date, or recency cue appears.
  20. absent: "More info soon" is not a clock time, date, or recency cue for the event.
  21. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue such as now or immediately appears. Soon only refers to later updates.
  22. absent: More info soon refers to later updates, not a time or recency for the event itself.
  23. absent: No clock time, date, or recency cue appears. "Soon" refers to more information, not the hazard.
  24. absent: Soon refers to more information coming, not when the event is, and no clock time appears.
  25. absent: More info soon is about updates, not a time or recency cue for the event.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find Impact absent: nothing states potential consequences or how serious the unnamed emergency is.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language is given for the unnamed emergency.
  2. absent: It states no consequence or severity, and emergency alone does not convey impact.
  3. absent: Nothing states potential consequences or how serious the unnamed emergency is.
  4. absent: The message does not state any harm or seriousness.
  5. absent: No harm, danger, or severity is described.
  6. absent: No statement of injury risk, danger, or other impact is included.
  7. absent: No consequence or severity of the unspecified emergency is stated.
  8. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, and if safe does not describe what the hazard could do.
  9. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond the generic emergency label.
  10. absent: It does not describe harm, danger, or other impacts.
  11. absent: Nothing states consequences or how serious the unnamed emergency is.
  12. absent: The text does not state harm or severity, and "if safe" conditions the instruction rather than describing impact.
  13. absent: No consequence or severity of the unnamed emergency is stated.
  14. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond the generic word emergency.
  15. absent: The text states no consequence or severity such as danger or possible injury.
  16. absent: No harm, danger, or severity language is attached to the reported emergency.
  17. absent: Nothing states consequences or seriousness beyond the word emergency.
  18. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond the generic emergency label.
  19. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, only that police are responding to an unspecified emergency.
  20. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond the generic emergency wording.
  21. absent: It does not state any consequence or severity, only that an unspecified emergency was reported.
  22. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, and if safe does not describe what the hazard could do.
  23. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, and "emergency" does not convey specific harm.
  24. absent: No consequence or severity is stated beyond the generic word emergency.
  25. absent: No consequence or severity is stated, and if safe does not describe harm.