Event participants seek shelter for severe storm warning
AI-generated · every claim is source-linkedUNH Police UNH Alert directed event participants to seek shelter or remain in vehicles during a severe storm warning with thunder/lightning.
- Alerts
- 1
- Response
- —
- Killed
- —
- Injured
- —
Alert Sequence
1 message in sequence · 1 verified verbatim
Confirmed wording is transcribed character-for-character from a primary source. Use Verify this quote under each message to open that source in a new tab and compare the text yourself.
How the first alert is built
To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.
UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Attention all event participants - Severe storm warning in effect. Thunder / lightening in the area. Seek shelter or remain in vehicles.
Sourceabsent0/25
Final assessment
Majority 25/25 absent. No campus brand, agency name, or alert signature appears in the text.
Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No campus brand, agency name, or alert signature appears in the text.
- absent: The wording never says who is sending the notice.
- absent: Source is absent: no university, police, or alert-system label is stated.
- absent: Nothing identifies an issuing authority or branded channel.
- absent: No sender tag or institutional self-naming is present.
- absent: Recipients cannot tell the source from the body alone.
- absent: Source codes zero because authority language is missing.
- absent: There is no ALERT brand or school name to credit as source.
- absent: The message jumps to content without naming who issued it.
- absent: No public-safety or campus office is identified as sender.
- absent: Source fails: blank on branded signature and agency.
- absent: Issuing body is not stated in any form.
- absent: Without a signature or school name, source is absent.
- absent: The text omits sender identification entirely.
- absent: No authority cue meets the source element rule.
- absent: Source not present under the branding or agency tests.
- absent: Who authored the alert is left unspecified.
- absent: There is no institutional label to treat as source.
- absent: Sender identity cannot be read from the message.
- absent: Source scores absent on this wording.
- absent: No alert header or campus self-reference is included.
- absent: The body never attributes the notice to an issuer.
- absent: Authority line is missing from start to end.
- absent: Source element fails for lack of named sender.
- absent: Nothing in the text names a sending organization.
Hazardpresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Hazard is specific: the text names "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: A concrete threat appears as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The what of the emergency is "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…", not a vague incident label.
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
- present: Readers learn the hazard type from "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The threat is particularized as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Coding H=1 because "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" is a named hazard.
- present: Specific danger language: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The alert states the problem as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Hazard element met by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" is more than a generic emergency word.
- present: Threat identity is clear from "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The message pins the hazard to "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Named condition "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" counts as hazard.
- present: H is present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" tells what is wrong.
- present: Concrete hazard wording includes "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The incident type is given as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
- present: Hazard codes yes on "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Specifics beat generics here: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The text's hazard signal is "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: What happened is labeled "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Hazard present with the phrase "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Threat naming succeeds through "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
Locationpresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Location is given through "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Place is specified as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Where is answered by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" functions as the location element.
- present: The alert situates the event with "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Geographic or campus place: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: L=1 because "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" names where this applies.
- present: Recipients are told the place via "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Location present in the phrase "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: A campus or building reference "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" covers location.
- present: The where cue is "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" identifies the affected area.
- present: Place naming succeeds with "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Location codes yes on "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Site detail appears as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The message anchors place with "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" is enough location under the rubric.
- present: Affected place language: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: L is present via "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Campus geography is marked by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Where this matters is "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The text localizes to "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Location element met by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Place is not left blank: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Spatial reference "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" supports L=1.
Guidancepresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "Seek shelter".
The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Guidance is the instruction "Seek shelter".
- present: Protective action appears as "Seek shelter".
- present: Recipients are told to act via "Seek shelter".
- present: "Seek shelter" is a direct what-to-do line.
- present: G=1 because "Seek shelter" instructs the audience.
- present: The alert directs action with "Seek shelter".
- present: Guidance present: "Seek shelter".
- present: A clear instruction is "Seek shelter".
- present: What to do is stated as "Seek shelter".
- present: "Seek shelter" counts as protective guidance.
- present: Action language "Seek shelter" meets guidance.
- present: The message tells people "Seek shelter".
- present: Guidance codes yes on "Seek shelter".
- present: Operational direction: "Seek shelter".
- present: Instructional content includes "Seek shelter".
- present: "Seek shelter" is audience-facing guidance.
- present: G is present via the cue "Seek shelter".
- present: Protective or operational order "Seek shelter" is explicit.
- present: The text's guidance signal is "Seek shelter".
- present: Recipients receive the directive "Seek shelter".
- present: What-to-do element satisfied by "Seek shelter".
- present: "Seek shelter" tells the public how to respond or operate.
- present: Guidance met through "Seek shelter".
- present: Action instruction present: "Seek shelter".
- present: The alert's order to the audience is "Seek shelter".
Timeabsent0/25
Final assessment
Majority 25/25 absent. No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today appears.
When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.
See all 25 individual reads
- absent: No clock time, date, or recency word such as now or today appears.
- absent: Time is absent from the alert text.
- absent: Nothing tells recipients when this applies.
- absent: T=0 because temporal cues are missing.
- absent: No day, hour, or immediate language is stated.
- absent: The message omits timing entirely.
- absent: Time element fails on this wording.
- absent: When is left unspecified.
- absent: No calendar or clock reference is present.
- absent: Temporal information cannot be found.
- absent: Without a time cue, T is zero.
- absent: The alert is silent on schedule.
- absent: Time codes absent here.
- absent: Recency language is missing.
- absent: T fails the when test.
- absent: No today/now/clock marker appears.
- absent: Timing is not established by the text.
- absent: Date and hour are both omitted.
- absent: Temporal element is not satisfied.
- absent: The body lacks any when cue.
- absent: Time not present under the rubric.
- absent: Schedule detail is blank.
- absent: No temporal anchor is given.
- absent: T is absent on timeless wording.
- absent: When-information is not included.
Impactpresent25/25
Final assessment
Majority 25/25 present. Impact is conveyed by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.
See all 25 individual reads
- present: Impact is conveyed by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Consequence language appears as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Severity or harm is signaled by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" states what the hazard does to people or operations.
- present: I=1 because "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" implies real-world impact.
- present: The alert spells impact through "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Impact present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Operational or safety consequence "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" is explicit.
- present: What could happen is framed as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" counts as impact beyond bare hazard naming.
- present: Impact element met by "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Severity cue "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" supports I=1.
- present: I codes yes on "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The text links hazard to effect via "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Consequence wording: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" shows stakes for the campus community.
- present: Impact is not left implicit only: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Harm or closure effect appears as "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: I is present via "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: The message states impact with "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Real-world effect language "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" is included.
- present: Impact signal: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…" communicates severity or disruption.
- present: Consequence is clear from "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
- present: Impact present through the phrase "UNH Alert: Severe Weather Warning. Atte…".
Coded by SuperGrok Heavy 4.5
Systematic AI judgments with visible reasoning, not human-validated codings.
Background
Key Findings
Sources
Every claim on this page is meant to be checkable. Open the links below (and the Verify this quote control under each confirmed alert) to read the original university, news, or archive page yourself. Hostnames are shown so you can see where you are going; archived copies survive when live pages move or disappear. See also our methodology.
- Social
Campus Alert Archive. "University of New Hampshire: Event participants seek shelter for severe storm warning." Incident of September 6, 2025. Added August 2026. https://campusalertarchive.com/case/university-of-new-hampshire-severe-storm-event-seek-shelter-2025-09-06/
Alert text quoted on this page remains the work of the issuing institution; the archive is a secondary source.