E-bike taken from bicycle racks at Price Hall

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  OU-NORMAN Critical is a branded sender tag at the start of the message.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "OU-NORMAN Critical", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "OU-NORMAN Critical" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "OU-NORMAN Critical" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "OU-NORMAN Critical".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "OU-NORMAN Critical" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "OU-NORMAN Critical", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "OU-NORMAN Critical" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "OU-NORMAN Critical".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "OU-NORMAN Critical" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "OU-NORMAN Critical".
  11. present: The body names it with "OU-NORMAN Critical", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "OU-NORMAN Critical".
  13. present: Because the alert says "OU-NORMAN Critical", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "OU-NORMAN Critical" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "OU-NORMAN Critical" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "OU-NORMAN Critical" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "OU-NORMAN Critical" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "OU-NORMAN Critical" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "OU-NORMAN Critical" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "OU-NORMAN Critical" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "OU-NORMAN Critical".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "OU-NORMAN Critical".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "OU-NORMAN Critical" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "OU-NORMAN Critical" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "OU-NORMAN Critical" is on the page, so present.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike) is a specific named offense.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)".
  11. present: The body names it with "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)".
  13. present: Because the alert says "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "Motor Vehicle Theft (E-Bike)" is on the page, so present.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK is a named place and address.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The deciding words are "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK", so this element is present.
  2. present: This read treats "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" as enough to mark the element present.
  3. present: Quoted evidence "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" is the specific language that carries the element.
  4. present: I mark present because the alert includes "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK".
  5. present: Presence follows from the phrase "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" in the body.
  6. present: The message supplies "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK", which satisfies the element on this pass.
  7. present: On this independent read, "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" is the hook that makes the element present.
  8. present: Element is present: the text itself contains "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK".
  9. present: A first-time reader would see "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" and know the element is there.
  10. present: Coding present from the explicit wording "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK".
  11. present: The body names it with "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK", so the vote is present.
  12. present: This pass votes present on the strength of "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK".
  13. present: Because the alert says "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK", the element is not missing.
  14. present: The quoted span "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" is sufficient and does not need outside knowledge.
  15. present: Present: "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" is in the transmitted text.
  16. present: I am scoring present after locating "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" in the message.
  17. present: The element is carried by "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" rather than by implication alone.
  18. present: Direct language "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" is what this pass uses for a present vote.
  19. present: Nothing in the rest of the text undoes "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" as the present cue.
  20. present: This reviewer finds "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" and therefore records present.
  21. present: The alert is not silent here: it has "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK".
  22. present: Present vote rests on the visible words "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK".
  23. present: From the four corners of the message, "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" establishes the element.
  24. present: I quote "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" as the sole basis for present on this pass.
  25. present: Independent judgment: "Price Hall, 307 West Brooks Norman, OK" is on the page, so present.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The product points to a PDF for more information but does not tell recipients to avoid an area or call police.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  18. absent: Without a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a protective instruction such as avoid the area or call 911 is not on the page.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The body has no clock, date, now, or immediately.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  18. absent: Without a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a clock time, date, or recency cue such as now is not on the page.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The theft name is the hazard; there is no extra severity language such as dangerous.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: This pass finds no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft anywhere in the body, so the element is absent.
  2. absent: Absent: a full read never turns up a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  3. absent: The message never supplies a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft, which this rubric requires.
  4. absent: I vote absent because a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft is not in the transmitted text.
  5. absent: Nothing in the wording amounts to a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  6. absent: On this read the alert is silent on a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  7. absent: Absent follows from the lack of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft after reading the whole product.
  8. absent: A recipient would not learn a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft from this text.
  9. absent: The element fails: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft does not appear.
  10. absent: I cannot mark present without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft, and it is not there.
  11. absent: This independent pass sees no a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft to quote.
  12. absent: Coding absent; the body omits a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  13. absent: No clause in the alert does the work of a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  14. absent: The four corners of the message leave a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft unspecified.
  15. absent: Absent vote: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft would have to be invented.
  16. absent: This reviewer looked for a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft and did not find it.
  17. absent: The text stays at other facts and never reaches a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  18. absent: Without a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft in the wording, the element is missing.
  19. absent: Present would need a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft; that language is not used.
  20. absent: I record absent after confirming the product lacks a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft.
  21. absent: The alert does not identify a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft in any sentence.
  22. absent: Missing a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft is the reason for the absent vote.
  23. absent: This pass will not infer a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft from neighboring facts.
  24. absent: No quoted span equals a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft, so absent.
  25. absent: Independent judgment: a stated harm or severity beyond naming the theft is not on the page.