Campuses closed until 12:30 p.m. weather delay 01-21

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No campus brand, agency name, or alert signature appears in the text.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No campus brand, agency name, or alert signature appears in the text.
  2. absent: The wording never says who is sending the notice.
  3. absent: Source is absent: no university, police, or alert-system label is stated.
  4. absent: Nothing identifies an issuing authority or branded channel.
  5. absent: No sender tag or institutional self-naming is present.
  6. absent: Recipients cannot tell the source from the body alone.
  7. absent: Source codes zero because authority language is missing.
  8. absent: There is no ALERT brand or school name to credit as source.
  9. absent: The message jumps to content without naming who issued it.
  10. absent: No public-safety or campus office is identified as sender.
  11. absent: Source fails: blank on branded signature and agency.
  12. absent: Issuing body is not stated in any form.
  13. absent: Without a signature or school name, source is absent.
  14. absent: The text omits sender identification entirely.
  15. absent: No authority cue meets the source element rule.
  16. absent: Source not present under the branding or agency tests.
  17. absent: Who authored the alert is left unspecified.
  18. absent: There is no institutional label to treat as source.
  19. absent: Sender identity cannot be read from the message.
  20. absent: Source scores absent on this wording.
  21. absent: No alert header or campus self-reference is included.
  22. absent: The body never attributes the notice to an issuer.
  23. absent: Authority line is missing from start to end.
  24. absent: Source element fails for lack of named sender.
  25. absent: Nothing in the text names a sending organization.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  12. present: "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  15. present: Named condition "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  19. present: "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "HACC campuses are closed until 12:30 p.…".
• Locationabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No building, campus, street, or area is named.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No building, campus, street, or area is named.
  2. absent: Location is absent: the text never says where.
  3. absent: There is no place cue for recipients to orient to.
  4. absent: L=0 because spatial reference is missing.
  5. absent: The alert omits campus or site detail.
  6. absent: Where this applies is never stated.
  7. absent: No location language appears in the body.
  8. absent: Place naming fails on this wording.
  9. absent: Readers get no geographic anchor.
  10. absent: Location element is not satisfied.
  11. absent: Without a place name, L is zero.
  12. absent: The message leaves location unspecified.
  13. absent: No hall, campus, or area reference is present.
  14. absent: Spatial information is missing entirely.
  15. absent: L fails the place-naming test.
  16. absent: Affected site is not identified.
  17. absent: Location codes absent here.
  18. absent: The text is silent on where.
  19. absent: No campus geography is given.
  20. absent: Place element cannot be coded present.
  21. absent: Where-cue is blank in this alert.
  22. absent: Location not established by the wording.
  23. absent: Site detail is omitted.
  24. absent: No area or building reference exists.
  25. absent: L is absent on a pure no-place text.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "closed".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "closed".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "closed".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "closed".
  4. present: "closed" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "closed" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "closed".
  7. present: Guidance present: "closed".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "closed".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "closed".
  10. present: "closed" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "closed" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "closed".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "closed".
  14. present: Operational direction: "closed".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "closed".
  16. present: "closed" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "closed".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "closed" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "closed".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "closed".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "closed".
  22. present: "closed" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "closed".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "closed".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "closed".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "12:30 p.m".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "12:30 p.m".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "12:30 p.m".
  3. present: When is answered with "12:30 p.m".
  4. present: "12:30 p.m" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "12:30 p.m" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "12:30 p.m".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "12:30 p.m".
  8. present: Temporal detail "12:30 p.m" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "12:30 p.m".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "12:30 p.m".
  11. present: "12:30 p.m" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "12:30 p.m".
  13. present: T codes yes on "12:30 p.m".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "12:30 p.m" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "12:30 p.m".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "12:30 p.m".
  17. present: "12:30 p.m" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "12:30 p.m" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "12:30 p.m".
  20. present: Date or hour language "12:30 p.m" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "12:30 p.m".
  22. present: The when signal is "12:30 p.m".
  23. present: Time present through "12:30 p.m".
  24. present: "12:30 p.m" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "12:30 p.m" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.