Fondling in a residence hall by a non-affiliate

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. Campus Safety and the Office of Title IX identify the issuing and reporting offices.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The Rollins College Campus Safety Department received the Title IX report, naming the sender.
  2. present: Office of Title IX is identified as the reporting office that brought the case to Campus Safety.
  3. present: Campus Safety's phone 407-646-2999 and email identify the issuing unit.
  4. present: Who is speaking is Campus Safety, named in the opening and the contact close.
  5. present: Rollins College Campus Safety Department is the authority in the first sentence.
  6. present: Source is present because Campus Safety and Title IX are both named.
  7. present: The notice is issued in Campus Safety's voice, including the no ongoing threat assessment.
  8. present: A named campus department handles intake, victim care language, and the tip line.
  9. present: Title IX reported the fondling to Campus Safety, two identified offices.
  10. present: The address campussafety@rollins.edu is a departmental sender tag.
  11. present: Naming Campus Safety as the contact office satisfies source.
  12. present: Please contact Campus Safety names the official agency.
  13. present: The receiving authority is the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  14. present: Office of Title IX is a named campus office in the chain.
  15. present: Campus Safety Department states the threat finding and lists how to reach it.
  16. present: Sender identity is Campus Safety in the report sentence and the closing.
  17. present: Two units, Campus Safety and Title IX, are specified.
  18. present: The handling office includes a phone number, marking Campus Safety as the source.
  19. present: Who issued the timely notification is Campus Safety.
  20. present: Rollins College appears in the department name that received the December 4 report.
  21. present: A branded safety email marks the source as Campus Safety.
  22. present: The sender is not anonymous: Campus Safety and Title IX are named.
  23. present: Campus Safety is the agency asking for additional information.
  24. present: Source coding is met by the Campus Safety Department throughout.
  25. present: The authority named up front is the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous agreement that fondling and non-consensual sexual contact are specific named hazards.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header lists Sexual Assault, Non-Consensual Sexual Contact, and Fondling.
  2. present: Fondling is a specific sex offense, not a generic incident.
  3. present: Non-consensual sexual contact in the form of fondling specifies the hazard.
  4. present: The body says a non-Rollins affiliate engaged in sexual contact without consent.
  5. present: A Title IX report of fondling in Elizabeth Hall names the threat.
  6. present: Hazard is fondling, stated in the title block and again in the narrative.
  7. present: Non-consensual sexual contact is a specific offense, not an unspecified situation.
  8. present: The message names fondling rather than hiding behind emergency.
  9. present: Sexual assault in the header is a concrete crime type.
  10. present: Without consent plus fondling together name the sexual violence hazard.
  11. present: The threat is identified as fondling, a defined Clery sex offense.
  12. present: Title IX reported non-consensual sexual contact in the form of fondling.
  13. present: Naming fondling meets the specific threat test.
  14. present: The crime is sexual assault, further specified as fondling.
  15. present: A non-Rollins affiliate engaged in sexual contact without consent is a named hazard.
  16. present: Header and body both specify fondling, not a vague situation.
  17. present: The phrase in the form of fondling is an explicit hazard name.
  18. present: Sexual assault and fondling are specific threats listed at the top.
  19. present: This is not generic wording, the offense is fondling.
  20. present: Non-consensual sexual contact names what occurred.
  21. present: The timely notification is for fondling, a defined crime.
  22. present: Hazard is present because fondling and non-consensual contact are both stated.
  23. present: The report concerns fondling in Elizabeth Hall, a specific named threat.
  24. present: Sexual contact without consent is a concrete crime, not an unspecified emergency.
  25. present: The text names fondling as the reported offense.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location in Elizabeth Hall.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The fondling is placed in Elizabeth Hall.
  2. present: The November 10 events are sited in Elizabeth Hall.
  3. present: A named residence hall, Elizabeth Hall, is the scene.
  4. present: That occurred in Elizabeth Hall on November 10, 2024 supplies place.
  5. present: Where is answered: Elizabeth Hall.
  6. present: The non-consensual contact is geographically tied to Elizabeth Hall.
  7. present: Elizabeth Hall is a concrete campus building name.
  8. present: Place is Elizabeth Hall, not an unnamed area.
  9. present: Readers learn the offense happened in Elizabeth Hall.
  10. present: A hall name, Elizabeth Hall, locates the November 10 report.
  11. present: Location is present: Elizabeth Hall.
  12. present: The building Elizabeth Hall answers where.
  13. present: Campus geography is specified as Elizabeth Hall.
  14. present: In Elizabeth Hall appears as the occurrence site.
  15. present: The report is anchored at Elizabeth Hall.
  16. present: Named place: Elizabeth Hall.
  17. present: The text locates the sexual contact in Elizabeth Hall.
  18. present: Elizabeth Hall is the scene of the November 10 fondling.
  19. present: A residence hall building name supplies location.
  20. present: Location coding is met by Elizabeth Hall.
  21. present: The incident occurred in Elizabeth Hall on November 10, 2024.
  22. present: Where the fondling happened is Elizabeth Hall.
  23. present: The notice names Elizabeth Hall as the place.
  24. present: Elizabeth Hall is a concrete campus building, satisfying location.
  25. present: Occurrence in Elizabeth Hall is an explicit location phrase.
• Guidanceabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no protective instruction. Contacting Campus Safety with additional information is a tips request. A minority treats that number as guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Readers are never told to avoid Elizabeth Hall, lock a door, or take other protective action.
  2. absent: If you have any additional information, please contact Campus Safety is a tips request.
  3. absent: Victim care and proper offices language describes help for the reporting party, not public guidance.
  4. absent: Both parties have been identified is status, not an instruction to lock down or leave.
  5. present: The closing number 407-646-2999 tells recipients to call Campus Safety, akin to call 911.
  6. absent: No shelter, evacuate, remain indoors, or stay away wording is aimed at readers.
  7. absent: The no ongoing threat line is a risk finding, not a protective action order.
  8. absent: Guidance is missing: the community is briefed, not told how to protect itself.
  9. absent: Connected with the proper offices on campus is about the reporting party only.
  10. absent: Nothing instructs students to lock rooms, leave, or monitor for updates.
  11. absent: Please contact for additional information is witness intake, not run hide fight.
  12. absent: Responder work (identification, care, threat assessment) is not guidance to recipients.
  13. absent: No protective action verb is directed at the people reading the notice.
  14. present: Emailing campussafety@rollins.edu is framed as the action to take if the reader knows more.
  15. absent: The message never tells students to take shelter or avoid a building.
  16. absent: Phoning in additional information is not a safety maneuver for the public.
  17. absent: Being provided with care is not guidance to the campus audience.
  18. absent: There is no lockdown, evacuate, or avoid the area line.
  19. absent: Readers get facts and a tips number, not an order to protect themselves.
  20. present: Call or email Campus Safety is a directed action comparable to the rubric example call 911.
  21. absent: Guidance fails because no protective action is directed at the campus audience.
  22. absent: The text does not instruct people to stay inside, leave, or stay away.
  23. absent: Identifying both parties and offering victim care are not instructions to the community.
  24. absent: Protective guidance is missing, and only a request for extra information appears.
  25. absent: Working the case and connecting the reporting party to offices is responder activity, not public guidance.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that December 5, December 4, November 10, 2024, and at this time satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The product line is dated December 5, 2024.
  2. present: Campus Safety received the report on December 4, 2024, a clear date.
  3. present: The fondling itself is dated November 10, 2024.
  4. present: At this time marks recency in the no ongoing threat sentence.
  5. present: Three dates appear: November 10, December 4, and December 5, 2024.
  6. present: On December 4, 2024 opens the intake sentence with a date.
  7. present: Time is present through the November 10, 2024 occurrence date.
  8. present: December 5, 2024 stamps the timely notification.
  9. present: The incident date November 10, 2024 and the receive date December 4, 2024 both count.
  10. present: Recency is present in the phrase at this time.
  11. present: Calendar marks include December 5, 2024 under the crime header.
  12. present: When during the timeline is given by November 10, 2024.
  13. present: Multiple 2024 dates in the header and body satisfy time.
  14. present: On December 4, 2024, the department received a report is a dated sentence.
  15. present: Time coding is met by November 10 plus the December intake and product dates.
  16. present: The phrase on November 10, 2024 conveys when the fondling occurred.
  17. present: A lag is visible: incident November 10, report received December 4, notice December 5.
  18. present: The warning itself is dated December 5, 2024.
  19. present: At this time plus November 10, 2024 give recency and a calendar mark.
  20. present: Recipients can tell the event is dated November 10, 2024.
  21. present: Time is not missing: three dates are written out.
  22. present: December 4, 2024 as the receive date is a when cue.
  23. present: November 10, 2024 meets the when test for the underlying offense.
  24. present: Header date December 5, 2024 and incident date November 10, 2024 both count.
  25. present: Dated language runs from November 10 through December 5, 2024.
• Impactabsent4/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because fondling names the offense without severity language. A few treat threat to campus safety or the assault itself as implied harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Fondling names the sex offense without added severity words such as dangerous.
  2. present: Fondling of a student without consent implies bodily harm to that person.
  3. absent: No injury, life threatening, or may cause harm clause appears.
  4. absent: We do not have a reason to believe there is an ongoing threat denies risk rather than stating consequences.
  5. absent: Impact is absent because sexual assault and fondling are hazard names, not severity language.
  6. absent: Appropriate level of care describes support, not what fondling could do to people.
  7. absent: Without consent restates the crime rather than describing injury or danger.
  8. present: Threat to campus safety, even when denied, is a harm to people formulation.
  9. absent: There is no explicit statement of injury, death, or other outcomes.
  10. absent: Naming fondling does not by itself describe what the hazard could do.
  11. absent: The message never says the contact was dangerous or could injure others.
  12. absent: Both parties identified is investigative status, not a harm statement.
  13. absent: Impact fails because no severity wording accompanies the crime name.
  14. absent: The text reports fondling and a no threat finding, not what the hazard could do.
  15. absent: Consequences such as injury are not stated.
  16. absent: Sexual assault in the header remains a hazard label, which is not enough for impact.
  17. present: Non-consensual sexual contact in the form of fondling clearly implies physical violation harm.
  18. absent: No life threatening or could be deadly phrase is used.
  19. absent: The notice is silent on outcomes beyond naming fondling.
  20. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime name.
  21. absent: Appropriate level of care does not describe the hazard's effects on the public.
  22. present: An ongoing threat to campus safety names potential community harm even as it is ruled out.
  23. absent: The rubric requires more than the word fondling, and no extra severity words appear.
  24. absent: A no ongoing threat sentence is a status update, not a statement of what fondling could do.
  25. absent: Without words like dangerous or may cause harm, impact is not met.