Rape in a residence hall by a known non-affiliate

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. Rollins College Campus Safety Department and the Office of Title IX are named authorities.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the unit that received the Title IX report.
  2. present: Office of Title IX is identified as the office that reported the rape to Campus Safety.
  3. present: Campus Safety is the contact at 407-646-2999 and campussafety@rollins.edu, a sender tag.
  4. present: Who is speaking is the Campus Safety Department, named in the opening sentence.
  5. present: Rollins College Campus Safety Department plus the Office of Title IX identify the authorities.
  6. present: Source is present: Campus Safety received the report and invites further contact.
  7. present: The notice is voiced by Campus Safety, which assesses ongoing threat and lists its phone line.
  8. present: A named campus department, Campus Safety, is the actor throughout.
  9. present: Title IX and Campus Safety are both specified agencies in the intake chain.
  10. present: The email campussafety@rollins.edu identifies the issuing campus safety office.
  11. present: Naming the Rollins College Campus Safety Department satisfies source.
  12. present: Please contact Campus Safety names the official sender and intake point.
  13. present: The first sentence credits Campus Safety as the receiving authority.
  14. present: Office of Title IX is a named campus office feeding the timely notification.
  15. present: Campus Safety Department is the agency that states there is no ongoing threat.
  16. present: Sender identity comes from Rollins College Campus Safety in the report line and the closing.
  17. present: Two campus units are named: Campus Safety and Title IX.
  18. present: The handling office is Campus Safety, listed with a phone number and email.
  19. present: Who issued it is the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  20. present: Campus Safety is the named department providing care language and the contact block.
  21. present: A branded departmental address, campussafety@rollins.edu, marks the source.
  22. present: The text names Campus Safety and Title IX rather than leaving the sender anonymous.
  23. present: Rollins College appears in the department title that received the December 9 report.
  24. present: Source coding is met by Campus Safety as the investigating and contacting office.
  25. present: The authority is the Campus Safety Department, stated up front.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous that rape and non-consensual sexual contact name a specific hazard, not a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header names Sexual Assault, Non-Consensual Sexual Contact, and Rape.
  2. present: Rape is a specific crime, not a generic incident or situation.
  3. present: Non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape specifies the hazard.
  4. present: The body reports sexual contact with a Rollins student without consent.
  5. present: A report of rape that occurred in Elizabeth Hall names the threat.
  6. present: Hazard is rape, stated in the title and the first paragraph.
  7. present: Non-consensual sexual contact is a specific offense description.
  8. present: The message names rape rather than hiding behind the word emergency.
  9. present: Sexual assault in the header is a concrete Clery crime.
  10. present: Without consent plus rape together name the sexual violence hazard.
  11. present: The threat is identified as rape, a specific act.
  12. present: Title IX reported non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape.
  13. present: Naming rape meets the specific threat test.
  14. present: The crime is sexual assault, further specified as rape.
  15. present: A known non-Rollins affiliate engaged in sexual contact without consent is a named hazard.
  16. present: Header and narrative both specify rape rather than a vague situation.
  17. present: The phrase in the form of rape is an explicit hazard name.
  18. present: Sexual assault and rape are specific threats listed at the top.
  19. present: This is not generic wording, the offense is rape.
  20. present: Non-consensual sexual contact names what occurred.
  21. present: The timely notification is for rape, a defined crime.
  22. present: Hazard is present because rape and non-consensual contact are both stated.
  23. present: The report concerns rape in Elizabeth Hall, a specific named threat.
  24. present: Sexual contact without consent is a concrete crime, not an unspecified emergency.
  25. present: The text names rape as the reported offense.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location in Elizabeth Hall.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The rape is placed in Elizabeth Hall.
  2. present: Location is Elizabeth Hall, named in the first narrative sentence.
  3. present: A specific building, Elizabeth Hall, is the site.
  4. present: That occurred in Elizabeth Hall is an explicit place phrase.
  5. present: Where: Elizabeth Hall.
  6. present: The sexual assault is sited in Elizabeth Hall.
  7. present: Elizabeth Hall is a named on-campus location.
  8. present: The early morning rape is geographically tied to Elizabeth Hall.
  9. present: Place is given as Elizabeth Hall, not an unnamed area.
  10. present: Readers are told the crime happened in Elizabeth Hall.
  11. present: A hall name, Elizabeth Hall, locates the incident.
  12. present: Location is present: Elizabeth Hall.
  13. present: The building Elizabeth Hall answers where.
  14. present: Campus geography is specified as Elizabeth Hall.
  15. present: In Elizabeth Hall appears as the occurrence site.
  16. present: The report is anchored at Elizabeth Hall.
  17. present: Named place: Elizabeth Hall.
  18. present: The text locates non-consensual contact in Elizabeth Hall.
  19. present: Elizabeth Hall is the scene of the December 9 rape.
  20. present: A residence hall building name supplies location.
  21. present: Location coding is met by Elizabeth Hall.
  22. present: The incident occurred in Elizabeth Hall in the early morning hours.
  23. present: Where the rape happened is Elizabeth Hall.
  24. present: The notice names Elizabeth Hall as the place.
  25. present: Elizabeth Hall is a concrete campus building, satisfying location.
• Guidanceabsent3/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no protective instruction: the Campus Safety number is a tips line, and victim care is not audience guidance. A few treat the contact line as call the police guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No avoid, lock, evacuate, or stay away instruction is given to recipients.
  2. absent: Contact Campus Safety if you have additional information is a tips request, not protective guidance.
  3. absent: Care and resources for the reporting party describe aid to one person, not a public action.
  4. present: The close tells people to contact Campus Safety at 407-646-2999, which is an action instruction.
  5. absent: We do not have a reason to believe there is an ongoing threat is a status line, not guidance.
  6. absent: Connected with the proper offices is about the victim, not the audience.
  7. absent: Recipients are not told to lock doors, remain inside, or avoid Elizabeth Hall.
  8. absent: Guidance is absent: the community is informed, not directed to take a protective step.
  9. absent: Parties have been identified is investigative status, not an instruction.
  10. absent: Nothing says shelter, leave, or monitor for updates.
  11. absent: Please contact for additional information is witness reporting, not run hide fight or stay away.
  12. absent: The rubric excludes responder activity, and care plus threat assessment are responder activity.
  13. present: Emailing campussafety@rollins.edu is presented as what readers should do if they know more.
  14. absent: No protective action verb is aimed at the people reading the notice.
  15. absent: The message never tells students to take shelter or avoid a building.
  16. absent: Additional information should be called in, which is not a safety maneuver for the public.
  17. absent: Being provided with care is not guidance to recipients.
  18. absent: There is no lock down, evacuate, or avoid the area line.
  19. absent: Readers get facts and a tips number, not an order to protect themselves.
  20. absent: Ongoing threat language explains risk status and does not tell anyone what to do.
  21. absent: Guidance fails because no protective action is directed at the campus audience.
  22. present: Call or email Campus Safety is a directed action comparable to the rubric's call 911 example.
  23. absent: The text does not instruct people to stay inside, leave, or stay away.
  24. absent: Identifying parties and offering victim care are not instructions to the community.
  25. absent: Protective guidance is missing, and only a request for extra information appears.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that December 10, December 9, early morning hours, and at this time satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The notice is dated December 10, 2024, and the rape is dated December 9, 2024.
  2. present: Early morning hours of December 9, 2024 is a date plus a time of day window.
  3. present: December 10, 2024 appears as the product date.
  4. present: On December 9, 2024 opens the report sentence with a date.
  5. present: At this time is a recency cue in the ongoing threat sentence.
  6. present: Two calendar dates plus early morning hours satisfy when.
  7. present: Time is present: December 9, 2024, early morning.
  8. present: The department received the report on December 9, 2024.
  9. present: Early morning hours is a clock window style time reference.
  10. present: Dated language includes December 10, 2024 in the header block.
  11. present: Recency is marked by at this time regarding campus threat.
  12. present: The incident day is December 9, 2024.
  13. present: When is answered by early morning hours of December 9, 2024.
  14. present: Multiple date stamps appear in the header and body.
  15. present: December 9, 2024 is stated twice, as receive date and occurrence date.
  16. present: Time coding is met by December dates and the early morning qualifier.
  17. present: The phrase in the early morning hours conveys when during the day.
  18. present: A specific day, December 9, 2024, locates the rape in time.
  19. present: The warning itself is dated December 10, 2024.
  20. present: At this time plus the December 9 date give recency and a calendar mark.
  21. present: Recipients can tell the event is the early morning of December 9, 2024.
  22. present: Time is not missing: dates and morning hours are written out.
  23. present: On December 9, 2024, Campus Safety received a report is a dated sentence.
  24. present: The early morning hours of December 9, 2024 meet the when test.
  25. present: Header date December 10, 2024 and incident date December 9, 2024 both count.
• Impactabsent5/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because naming rape restates the hazard. A few treat ongoing threat to campus safety or the crime itself as implied harm.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Rape names the crime, and the rubric says naming the hazard alone does not satisfy impact.
  2. absent: No dangerous, life threatening, or may cause injury language appears.
  3. absent: We do not have a reason to believe there is an ongoing threat denies current risk rather than stating consequences.
  4. absent: Impact is absent: sexual assault is the hazard name, not a severity clause.
  5. absent: Care and resources describe support, not what the rape could do to people.
  6. present: Rape is a crime whose name strongly implies severe bodily harm to the victim.
  7. absent: Without consent restates the offense rather than describing injury or danger.
  8. absent: There is no explicit statement of injury, death, or other outcomes.
  9. present: Ongoing threat to campus safety is impact language, even though it is negated here.
  10. absent: Naming non-consensual sexual contact does not add a consequence sentence.
  11. absent: The message never says the assault was dangerous or could injure others.
  12. absent: Parties identified is investigative status, not a harm statement.
  13. absent: Impact fails because no severity wording accompanies the crime name.
  14. absent: The text reports a rape and a no threat finding, not what the hazard could do.
  15. present: An ongoing threat to campus safety, even as a denied condition, names potential community harm.
  16. absent: Consequences such as injury are not stated.
  17. absent: Sexual assault in the header is still the hazard label, which is not enough for impact.
  18. present: Non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape clearly implies physical violation harm.
  19. absent: No life threatening or could be deadly phrase is used.
  20. absent: The notice is silent on outcomes beyond naming rape.
  21. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime name.
  22. absent: Appropriate level of care does not describe the hazard's effects on the public.
  23. absent: The rubric requires more than the word rape, and no extra severity words appear.
  24. absent: A no ongoing threat sentence is a status update, not a statement of what rape could do.
  25. present: Threat to campus safety is a harm to people formulation, so impact is conveyed.