Rape reported on campus earlier in the week

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads agree source is present. The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the unit that received the report.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The Rollins College Campus Safety Department is named as the unit that received the report.
  2. present: The first sentence credits Campus Safety with receiving the rape report.
  3. present: Source is present because Campus Safety appears as the responding campus authority.
  4. present: The closing line lists Campus Safety with a phone number and email, identifying the sender.
  5. present: Rollins College appears in the department name that took the report.
  6. present: Campus Safety functions here as the listed campus public safety office.
  7. present: Who is sending is clear from Campus Safety as both intake office and contact.
  8. present: A named campus agency, Campus Safety, is the actor in the opening sentence.
  9. present: Recipients can tell the notice comes from Campus Safety, the named department.
  10. present: The text attributes report receipt to the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  11. present: Naming Campus Safety satisfies the who is sending test for a campus authority.
  12. present: The only agency in the body is Campus Safety, which received the report.
  13. present: The notice is voiced through Campus Safety, which received the rape report.
  14. present: A campus public safety department is identified as taking the Clery notice.
  15. present: Rollins College Campus Safety Department received a report names the source up front.
  16. present: The email campussafety@rollins.edu at the end brands the issuing office.
  17. present: Source is the named department taking the timely notification.
  18. present: Timely Notification plus Campus Safety together identify the issuing campus office.
  19. present: The college names its Campus Safety Department as the office that took the report.
  20. present: Source is present: the Rollins College Campus Safety Department.
  21. present: A named campus safety unit identifies who is responding.
  22. present: The handling office is stated as Campus Safety throughout the notice.
  23. present: Campus Safety appears as the official unit receiving the on campus rape report.
  24. present: Readers are pointed to Campus Safety as the authority to contact, which identifies the source.
  25. present: The department that received the report is Campus Safety, a named public safety office.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Unanimous agreement that rape and non-consensual sexual contact name a specific hazard rather than a generic incident.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The header names sexual assault and rape, specific crimes rather than a generic incident.
  2. present: Non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape specifies the hazard rather than a vague emergency.
  3. present: Sexual contact without consent names a concrete offense, not merely an emergency or situation.
  4. present: The message titles the event Sexual Assault and Rape, which are specific threat types.
  5. present: Hazard is present because rape and non-consensual sexual contact are both named.
  6. present: One student engaged in sexual contact without consent, which names the offense plainly.
  7. present: What the threat is is answered as rape, stated in the title and the body.
  8. present: Non generic wording appears: rape, not incident or situation alone.
  9. present: The crime type is rape, further labeled non-consensual sexual contact.
  10. present: Header and body both specify rape as the reported offense.
  11. present: A report of rape is a defined interpersonal crime, not a vague label.
  12. present: Sexual contact with another student without consent names a particular assault.
  13. present: Naming rape satisfies the specific threat requirement.
  14. present: The text classifies the event as sexual assault in the form of rape.
  15. present: Hazard is rape, stated as the reason for the timely notification.
  16. present: The report concerns non-consensual sexual contact, a concrete hostile act.
  17. present: Rape is the listed Clery crime, not a generic incident word used alone.
  18. present: Campus Safety received a report of rape, which names the hazard.
  19. present: Non-consensual sexual contact is a specific conduct description, not a placeholder emergency.
  20. present: The notice is about rape between two Rollins students, a named crime.
  21. present: Hazard coding is met by rape in the headline and narrative.
  22. present: The threat is rape by one Rollins student against another, which is specific.
  23. present: Received a report of non-consensual sexual contact in the form of rape, a defined offense.
  24. present: The body explains the assault as sexual contact without consent.
  25. present: A specific sexual crime, rape, is stated rather than a generic situation.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 reads find location in the phrase on campus, which the rubric treats as a place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The rape is placed on campus, which the rubric treats as a location.
  2. present: Location is on campus, stated in the first narrative sentence.
  3. present: On campus answers where the reported rape occurred.
  4. present: The campus itself is named as the place of the rape.
  5. present: The text places the incident on campus rather than off campus or unnamed.
  6. present: Geography is the campus, which counts as a place under the rubric.
  7. present: Readers are told the event occurred on campus.
  8. present: Location coding is met by the phrase on campus.
  9. present: Place is given as on campus rather than an unnamed off site area.
  10. present: The phrase occurred on campus is an explicit location.
  11. present: Where the rape happened is on campus.
  12. present: A campus-wide place cue, on campus, is the setting.
  13. present: The notice sites the rape on campus.
  14. present: On campus is a concrete place phrase, which satisfies location.
  15. present: The first sentence locates the rape on campus.
  16. present: Named place: on campus.
  17. present: The crime is tied to campus as a whole.
  18. present: Location is present because on campus is an allowed place cue.
  19. present: The text says the rape occurred on campus.
  20. present: On campus is enough geography for the location element.
  21. present: The report is geographically anchored on campus.
  22. present: Campus is the only geographic identifier and the rubric accepts it.
  23. present: Where the conduct happened is on campus, a named setting.
  24. present: Campus geography is identified with the words on campus.
  25. present: The location element is met by naming campus as the site.
• Guidanceabsent2/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no protective instruction: contacting Campus Safety for additional information is a tips request. A minority treats that phone line as guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No sentence tells recipients to avoid campus, lock doors, or take other protective action.
  2. absent: Contact Campus Safety if you have additional information is a request for tips, not guidance.
  3. absent: Care, resources, and reporting options are for the reporting party, not a public protective action.
  4. present: The close tells readers to contact Campus Safety at 407-646-2999, an action similar to calling police.
  5. absent: Being provided with care describes help for the victim, not an instruction to the audience.
  6. absent: There is no shelter, evacuate, stay away, or remain indoors language.
  7. absent: The body reports a past rape case and never instructs the audience to protect themselves.
  8. absent: Timely Notification is a product label, not an instruction to lock doors or leave.
  9. absent: Nothing directs people to avoid any building, monitor updates, or stay inside.
  10. absent: Recipients are not told to stay inside, leave, or secure their rooms.
  11. absent: Guidance is absent: the text has no instruction telling people what to do to stay safe.
  12. absent: Please contact Campus Safety is a tips line, which is not a protective action.
  13. absent: The reporting party has been identified is status, not a directive to the public.
  14. absent: Providing care to the reporting party is responder work, not guidance to recipients.
  15. absent: The notice never says call 911, evacuate, or lock doors.
  16. absent: Asking for additional information is a request for tips, not protective guidance.
  17. absent: No protective action for the campus community is stated.
  18. absent: Follow instructions, seek shelter, and similar verbs do not appear.
  19. absent: Readers are not told to avoid any building or watch for anyone.
  20. absent: The phone number is offered only if you have additional information, a tips ask.
  21. absent: The email contact is for extra information, not a safety instruction.
  22. present: Please contact Campus Safety at the listed number tells people to call the department, which can count as guidance.
  23. absent: Stating that a threat cannot be confirmed is not an instruction to act.
  24. absent: Guidance fails because the only ask is to share additional information, not to take cover or leave.
  25. absent: Protective action for the public is missing, and only a tips contact is offered.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Broad agreement that September 15, 2024 and earlier this week satisfy time.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: September 15, 2024 appears as the header date.
  2. present: Earlier this week is a recency cue attached to the September 15, 2024 report.
  3. present: On September 15, 2024 dates the report to Campus Safety.
  4. present: Recency is present through at this time plus earlier this week.
  5. present: A calendar date plus earlier this week satisfy the time element.
  6. present: The timely notification carries the date September 15, 2024.
  7. present: Earlier this week is a recency phrase for when the rape occurred.
  8. present: A specific day, September 15, 2024, is given for the report.
  9. present: Time is present via the printed September 15, 2024 dateline.
  10. present: At this time is a recency cue attached to the threat assessment sentence.
  11. present: Earlier this week supplies when the rape occurred relative to the notice.
  12. present: Dated references include the header and the report day, both September 15, 2024.
  13. present: A calendar date stamps both the timely notification and the underlying report.
  14. present: The first sentence dates the report On September 15, 2024.
  15. present: Time coding is met by September 15, 2024, earlier this week, and at this time.
  16. present: When is answered with a September date, earlier this week, and at this time.
  17. present: The rape is placed earlier this week relative to September 15, 2024.
  18. present: The header date September 15, 2024 satisfies when.
  19. present: Dated language includes September 15, 2024 as the day Campus Safety was notified.
  20. present: Recency and calendar time are both present in the notice.
  21. present: The notice is not timeless: it names September 15, 2024 and earlier this week.
  22. present: September 15, 2024 functions as a time stamp for both the notice and the report.
  23. present: The phrase earlier this week is a clear recency window.
  24. present: Time is not missing: a date, earlier this week, and at this time are in the text.
  25. present: The September date and earlier this week meet the when or recency test.
• Impactabsent4/25

  Final assessment

  Most reads find no impact because rape names the crime without severity wording. A few read without consent or an unconfirmed community threat as harm cues.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Rape names the offense without extra severity words such as dangerous or life threatening.
  2. absent: No sentence states injury, trauma, or other consequences the rape could cause.
  3. present: Without consent implies a violation of the other student, a stated kind of harm.
  4. absent: Impact is absent because naming rape does not by itself describe what it could do.
  5. absent: There is no could be deadly, may cause injury, or similar consequence language.
  6. absent: Non-consensual sexual contact describes the conduct, not the harm it could produce.
  7. absent: Cannot confirm if there is an ongoing threat leaves risk open but does not state a consequence.
  8. absent: The message does not warn of injury, danger, or further attacks.
  9. absent: Naming a crime does not by itself convey how serious the effects are.
  10. absent: Impact fails because only the crime name and campus appear, with no consequence clause.
  11. absent: There is no life threatening, may cause injury, or destructive wording.
  12. present: Ongoing threat to the campus community is severity language even though it is unconfirmed.
  13. absent: Care and resources for the reporting party do not equal a statement of what rape could do.
  14. absent: The notice never says the rape could injure anyone or endanger others.
  15. absent: Due to limited information explains uncertainty, not a consequence of the hazard.
  16. absent: Impact is not present: there is no stated consequence beyond the crime's name.
  17. absent: Providing care does not equal stating the hazard's potential effects.
  18. absent: Reporting options for the victim add case handling, not a harm or severity clause.
  19. absent: The text does not call the rape dangerous, damaging, or life threatening.
  20. present: Engaged in sexual contact without consent is a harm cue toward the other student.
  21. absent: No explicit statement of what the rape could do to people is given beyond the crime name.
  22. present: Cannot confirm an ongoing threat to the campus community still flags possible community harm.
  23. absent: The word threat appears, but only as something that cannot be confirmed, not as stated impact.
  24. absent: Limited information is about investigative uncertainty, not the hazard's effects.
  25. absent: Impact coding fails: the hazard is named without a separate consequence or seriousness phrase.