Brawley buildings A and B lose power; classes stay in session

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes treat SDSU Imperial Valley and Facilities Services as source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: SDSU Imperial Valley, Brawley names the campus as the speaker of the outage.
  2. present: Facilities Services is named as the responding authority.
  3. present: Source is present because SDSU Imperial Valley is identified.
  4. present: The campus name SDSU Imperial Valley functions as a sender.
  5. present: Facilities Services is a named campus unit.
  6. present: The message names SDSU Imperial Valley as the affected and issuing campus.
  7. present: A named university site is the source cue.
  8. present: Readers can see SDSU is the institution talking.
  9. present: The campus name is printed in the first clause.
  10. present: Source is satisfied by SDSU Imperial Valley, Brawley.
  11. present: The first tokens name SDSU Imperial Valley.
  12. present: Facilities Services is on site, identifying the authority.
  13. present: Issuing authority is the SDSU Imperial Valley campus.
  14. present: The text does not hide the institution; it leads with SDSU Imperial Valley.
  15. present: A named campus, SDSU Imperial Valley, is the source.
  16. present: Source present: SDSU Imperial Valley, Brawley.
  17. present: The university site name appears in the first clause.
  18. present: Sender identity is the SDSU Imperial Valley campus name.
  19. present: The product names SDSU as the institution.
  20. present: Opening campus name is enough to mark who is talking.
  21. present: The alert carries a campus name rather than an unsigned body.
  22. present: Source is the SDSU Imperial Valley tag.
  23. present: Named sender is present in SDSU Imperial Valley, Brawley.
  24. present: The SMS identifies SDSU Imperial Valley as the site and speaker.
  25. present: A branded campus name supplies the source element.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Every pass marks the power outage as a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a power outage, a specific utility hazard.
  2. present: Hazard is lost power at two buildings.
  3. present: A power outage at buildings A and B is the threat.
  4. present: The text is not a generic emergency; it names lost power.
  5. present: Lost power is the hazard.
  6. present: Hazard present because a power outage is named.
  7. present: The threat is a power loss.
  8. present: Readers are told Brawley lost power.
  9. present: Specific hazard wording is lost power.
  10. present: It is a utility-failure hazard.
  11. present: The SMS names lost power.
  12. present: Hazard is the stated power outage.
  13. present: A named outage is the threat language.
  14. present: The SMS specifies lost power.
  15. present: Lost power at building A and building B is the hazard statement.
  16. present: The product tells you what happened: lost power.
  17. present: A concrete utility failure is named.
  18. present: Hazard is present in the lost power wording.
  19. present: The alert identifies a power outage.
  20. present: A power outage is a specific hazard.
  21. present: The body names the outage.
  22. present: Threat content is the power loss, stated directly.
  23. present: The SMS says lost power, which is the hazard.
  24. present: A defined utility hazard is given.
  25. present: Hazard satisfied by the lost power clause.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Brawley buildings A and B are named places.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: SDSU Imperial Valley, Brawley and buildings A and B are named places.
  2. present: Location is Brawley buildings A and B.
  3. present: Specific buildings and a campus site are given.
  4. present: Brawley building A and building B locate the outage.
  5. present: Location present: Brawley buildings A and B.
  6. present: Readers are told where: Brawley A and B.
  7. present: Named campus buildings are the location.
  8. present: The sites are building A and building B at Brawley.
  9. present: Place is explicit in campus and building names.
  10. present: Location is not generic; it is Brawley A and B.
  11. present: The bulletin locates the outage at Brawley buildings A and B.
  12. present: Building names satisfy location.
  13. present: Brawley is a geographic cue, and so are A and B.
  14. present: The scene is identified as Brawley A and B.
  15. present: Location is named facilities.
  16. present: Both buildings are place cues.
  17. present: Place is Brawley buildings A and B.
  18. present: The first sentence names Brawley and both buildings.
  19. present: Specific facilities are named.
  20. present: Location present via Brawley A and B.
  21. present: The building names are enough for location.
  22. present: Brawley and buildings A and B appear in the first sentence.
  23. present: Named structures are the location element.
  24. present: The place words are Brawley and two building letters.
  25. present: Location is satisfied by Brawley A and B.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The first product is a status report with no protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Classes are still in session is status, not a protective action.
  2. absent: The SMS does not tell people to evacuate, shelter, or avoid.
  3. absent: No instruction such as stay away appears.
  4. absent: Guidance is absent from the first product.
  5. absent: Recipients are not told what to do.
  6. absent: No protective action is given.
  7. absent: The product does not order a shelter or evacuation.
  8. absent: I find no do-this instruction.
  9. absent: Avoid, shelter, and leave are all missing.
  10. absent: Guidance fails because no action is directed at the audience.
  11. absent: The alert describes the outage without telling people how to act.
  12. absent: Classes still in session is information, not guidance.
  13. absent: Guidance is not satisfied by a status report.
  14. absent: Facilities on site is responder action, not guidance.
  15. absent: The SMS does not say stay out or reenter.
  16. absent: I code guidance absent.
  17. absent: There is no required action language.
  18. absent: The audience is not instructed.
  19. absent: No protective verb is aimed at the reader.
  20. absent: Status-only wording is not guidance.
  21. absent: The first alert is descriptive, not directive.
  22. absent: No call to action is present.
  23. absent: Guidance missing from the first product.
  24. absent: The text does not tell people to take a protective step.
  25. absent: I do not treat classes in session as an instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  This morning is treated as a recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: This morning is a recency cue.
  2. present: This morning marks the outage as today.
  3. present: A time cue is This morning.
  4. present: Time present via This morning.
  5. present: The phrase This morning is a when marker.
  6. present: Recency is This morning.
  7. present: Time is the This morning clause.
  8. present: The bulletin says This morning, SDSU Imperial Valley lost power.
  9. present: This morning is a time element.
  10. present: The when is this morning.
  11. present: A present-day This morning is the time mark.
  12. present: Clock is absent; This morning remains.
  13. present: Time is the This morning phrase.
  14. present: The narrative includes This morning as recency.
  15. present: This morning is time.
  16. present: The when is a same-day morning outage.
  17. present: A recency phrase is the time element.
  18. present: Time satisfied by This morning.
  19. present: The outage is described as This morning.
  20. present: This morning is explicit recency.
  21. present: The bulletin timestamps the event as this morning.
  22. present: No clock, but This morning is enough for time.
  23. present: The This morning clause is a time mark.
  24. present: Time is not missing if This morning counts.
  25. present: This morning is a clear when cue.
• Impactabsent5/25

  Final assessment

  Most passes find no stated harm to people.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No injury language is used.
  2. absent: The text does not say anyone was harmed.
  3. absent: Impact as harm to people is absent.
  4. absent: No deadly wording appears.
  5. absent: A power outage is the utility state, not a stated injury.
  6. absent: I do not infer injury the SMS does not speak.
  7. absent: No one is described as hurt.
  8. absent: Impact fails because no personal-harm outcome is written.
  9. absent: Severity of harm is not claimed.
  10. absent: The bulletin is a utility status, not an impact statement.
  11. absent: Nothing says people are in danger.
  12. absent: Impact is not satisfied by naming an outage alone.
  13. absent: No injury count is given.
  14. absent: I code impact absent.
  15. absent: The text stops at lost power and classes in session.
  16. absent: No life-threatening language is present.
  17. absent: Lost power is a service state, not impact under the rubric.
  18. absent: The alert does not say the situation is dangerous.
  19. absent: No impact verb such as threaten appears.
  20. absent: An outage notice is not impact unless harm is stated.
  21. present: Lost power at two buildings is a stated functional impact.
  22. present: I read a building outage as impact.
  23. present: Two buildings losing power is a consequence.
  24. present: Lost power is a stated result.
  25. present: A campus outage is impact language.