City water outage on San Diego campus; later restored

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes treat SDSU as source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Opens with SDSU has received a report, naming the university as the speaker.
  2. present: SDSU is named as the institution issuing the notice.
  3. present: Source is present because SDSU is identified.
  4. present: A university name sits at the start of the notice.
  5. present: SDSU is a sender tag.
  6. present: The message names SDSU as the source.
  7. present: A named campus is the source cue.
  8. present: Readers can see SDSU is talking.
  9. present: The campus name is printed in the first clause.
  10. present: Source is satisfied by SDSU.
  11. present: The first tokens name SDSU.
  12. present: The university is in contact with the City, identifying SDSU as actor.
  13. present: Issuing authority is SDSU.
  14. present: The text does not hide the sender; it leads with SDSU.
  15. present: A named university is the source.
  16. present: Source present: SDSU.
  17. present: The university name appears in the first clause.
  18. present: Sender identity is SDSU.
  19. present: The product names SDSU as the institution.
  20. present: Opening campus name is enough to mark who is talking.
  21. present: The alert carries a campus name rather than an unsigned body.
  22. present: Source is the SDSU tag.
  23. present: Named sender is present in SDSU.
  24. present: The notice identifies SDSU as the speaker.
  25. present: A branded campus name supplies the source element.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Every pass marks the unplanned water outage as a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names an unplanned water outage, a specific utility hazard.
  2. present: Hazard is a water outage on the San Diego campus.
  3. present: An unplanned water outage is the threat.
  4. present: The text is not a generic emergency; it names a water outage.
  5. present: A water outage is the hazard.
  6. present: Hazard present because a water outage is named.
  7. present: The threat is a water outage.
  8. present: Readers are told there is a water outage.
  9. present: Specific hazard wording is water outage.
  10. present: It is a utility-failure hazard.
  11. present: The notice names a water outage.
  12. present: Hazard is the stated water outage.
  13. present: A named outage is the threat language.
  14. present: The notice specifies a water outage.
  15. present: An unplanned water outage impacting parts of campus is the hazard statement.
  16. present: The product tells you what is happening: a water outage.
  17. present: A concrete utility failure is named.
  18. present: Hazard is present in the water outage wording.
  19. present: The alert identifies a water outage.
  20. present: A water outage is a specific hazard.
  21. present: The body names the outage.
  22. present: Threat content is the water outage, stated directly.
  23. present: The notice says a water outage, which is the hazard.
  24. present: A defined utility hazard is given.
  25. present: Hazard satisfied by the water outage clause.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  The San Diego campus is a named place.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: parts of campus in San Diego, SDSU Imperial Valley, and SDSU Mission Valley are named places.
  2. present: Location is the San Diego campus.
  3. present: Specific campuses are given.
  4. present: San Diego campus locates the outage.
  5. present: Location present: San Diego campus.
  6. present: Readers are told where: San Diego, not Imperial Valley or Mission Valley.
  7. present: Named campuses are the location.
  8. present: The site is parts of campus in San Diego.
  9. present: Place is explicit in campus names.
  10. present: Location is not generic; it is San Diego campus.
  11. present: The bulletin locates the outage on the San Diego campus.
  12. present: Campus names satisfy location.
  13. present: San Diego is a geographic cue.
  14. present: The scene is identified as San Diego campus.
  15. present: Location is named campuses.
  16. present: Snapdragon Stadium is also a place cue.
  17. present: Place is San Diego campus.
  18. present: The first sentence names San Diego.
  19. present: Specific campuses are named.
  20. present: Location present via San Diego campus.
  21. present: The campus name is enough for location.
  22. present: San Diego appears in the first sentence.
  23. present: Named campuses are the location element.
  24. present: The place words are San Diego campus.
  25. present: Location is satisfied by San Diego campus.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The first product is a status report with no protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: Information: Urgent.sdsu.edu is a pointer, not a protective action.
  2. absent: The notice does not tell people to evacuate, shelter, or avoid.
  3. absent: No instruction such as stay away appears.
  4. absent: Guidance is absent from the first product.
  5. absent: Recipients are not told what to do.
  6. absent: No protective action is given.
  7. absent: The product does not order a shelter or evacuation.
  8. absent: I find no do-this instruction.
  9. absent: Avoid, shelter, and leave are all missing.
  10. absent: Guidance fails because no action is directed at the audience.
  11. absent: The alert describes the outage without telling people how to act.
  12. absent: A status report is not guidance.
  13. absent: Guidance is not satisfied by an information URL.
  14. absent: City contact is responder action, not guidance.
  15. absent: The notice does not say stay out or conserve water.
  16. absent: I code guidance absent.
  17. absent: There is no required action language.
  18. absent: The audience is not instructed.
  19. absent: No protective verb is aimed at the reader.
  20. absent: Status-only wording is not guidance.
  21. absent: The first alert is descriptive, not directive.
  22. absent: No call to action is present.
  23. absent: Guidance missing from the first product.
  24. absent: The text does not tell people to take a protective step.
  25. absent: I do not treat an information URL as an instruction.
• Timeabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The first product body contains no clock, date, or now language.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No clock time appears in the first product body.
  2. absent: The text has no recency word such as today or now.
  3. absent: Time is absent from the first transmitted words.
  4. absent: There is no timestamp language inside the first product.
  5. absent: No date or hour is spoken in the first body.
  6. absent: The notice does not say now or immediately.
  7. absent: I find no time cue in the first product.
  8. absent: When is missing from the first body.
  9. absent: No as of phrase is present.
  10. absent: The product is silent on clock time.
  11. absent: Nothing in the first wording conveys recency.
  12. absent: Time fails; the archive 2:29 stamp is not part of the body.
  13. absent: No temporal adverb or clock appears in the first product.
  14. absent: The alert does not say the outage is happening now in those words.
  15. absent: Date and time language are not in the first quoted text.
  16. absent: There is no until-further-notice horizon.
  17. absent: I cannot mark Time present without a when cue in the first words.
  18. absent: The first body contains no time element.
  19. absent: Recency is not stated as a clock or date.
  20. absent: No hour, day, or now is written in the first product.
  21. absent: Time is coded absent for lack of any when language.
  22. absent: The first transmitted text is timeless: no clock, no date.
  23. absent: Nothing like immediately or as of is used.
  24. absent: The wording does not tell you when this applies.
  25. absent: No temporal marker survives in the first product.
• Impactabsent5/25

  Final assessment

  Most passes find no stated harm to people.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No injury language is used.
  2. absent: The text does not say anyone was harmed.
  3. absent: Impact as harm to people is absent.
  4. absent: No deadly wording appears.
  5. absent: A water outage is the utility state, not a stated injury.
  6. absent: I do not infer injury the notice does not speak.
  7. absent: No one is described as hurt.
  8. absent: Impact fails because no personal-harm outcome is written.
  9. absent: Severity of harm is not claimed.
  10. absent: The bulletin is a utility status, not an impact statement.
  11. absent: Nothing says people are in danger.
  12. absent: Impact is not satisfied by naming an outage alone.
  13. absent: No injury count is given.
  14. absent: I code impact absent.
  15. absent: The text stops at a water outage report.
  16. absent: No life-threatening language is present.
  17. absent: A water outage is a service state, not impact under the rubric.
  18. absent: The alert does not say the situation is dangerous.
  19. absent: No impact verb such as threaten appears.
  20. absent: An outage notice is not impact unless harm is stated.
  21. present: Impacting parts of campus is a stated functional impact.
  22. present: I read a campus water outage as impact.
  23. present: A water outage impacting campus is a consequence.
  24. present: Unplanned outage is a stated disruption.
  25. present: Campus-wide water loss is impact language.