Partial gas-line outage isolated; science buildings lose lab gas

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes treat SDSU Facilities Services as source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Opens with SDSU Facilities Services, which names the issuing unit.
  2. present: SDSU Facilities Services identifies the responding authority.
  3. present: Source is present because SDSU Facilities Services is named.
  4. present: A university unit signature sits at the start of the notice.
  5. present: SDSU Facilities Services is a sender tag.
  6. present: The message names SDSU Facilities Services as the source.
  7. present: A named campus department is the source cue.
  8. present: Readers can see SDSU Facilities Services is talking.
  9. present: The department name is printed in the first clause.
  10. present: Source is satisfied by SDSU Facilities Services.
  11. present: The first tokens name SDSU Facilities Services.
  12. present: Facilities Services is the named authority.
  13. present: Issuing authority is SDSU Facilities Services.
  14. present: The text does not hide the sender; it leads with SDSU Facilities Services.
  15. present: A named university department is the source.
  16. present: Source present: SDSU Facilities Services.
  17. present: The university unit name appears in the first clause.
  18. present: Sender identity is SDSU Facilities Services.
  19. present: The product names SDSU as the institution via Facilities Services.
  20. present: Opening department name is enough to mark who is talking.
  21. present: The alert carries a campus unit name rather than an unsigned body.
  22. present: Source is the SDSU Facilities Services tag.
  23. present: Named sender is present in SDSU Facilities Services.
  24. present: The notice identifies SDSU Facilities Services as the speaker.
  25. present: A branded campus unit supplies the source element.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Every pass marks the gas-line outage and isolated leak as a specific hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names a partial gas line outage and a gas leak, a specific hazard.
  2. present: Hazard is a gas-line outage and isolated leak.
  3. present: A partial gas line outage is the threat.
  4. present: The text is not a generic emergency; it names a gas leak.
  5. present: A gas leak isolated during repair is the hazard.
  6. present: Hazard present because a gas leak is named.
  7. present: The threat is a gas-line outage.
  8. present: Readers are told there is a partial gas line outage.
  9. present: Specific hazard wording is gas leak and gas line outage.
  10. present: It is a utility-failure hazard.
  11. present: The notice names a gas leak.
  12. present: Hazard is the stated gas-line outage.
  13. present: A named leak is the threat language.
  14. present: The notice specifies a gas leak.
  15. present: A partial gas line outage impacting listed buildings is the hazard statement.
  16. present: The product tells you what is happening: a gas-line outage.
  17. present: A concrete utility failure is named.
  18. present: Hazard is present in the gas leak wording.
  19. present: The alert identifies a gas-line outage.
  20. present: A gas leak is a specific hazard.
  21. present: The body names the leak.
  22. present: Threat content is the gas outage, stated directly.
  23. present: The notice says a gas leak has been isolated, which is the hazard.
  24. present: A defined utility hazard is given.
  25. present: Hazard satisfied by the gas-line outage clause.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  A list of named science and engineering buildings is the location.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Lot 16, SDSU Garage, Building A, HazMat Building, and several science halls are named places.
  2. present: Location is a list of named buildings.
  3. present: Specific buildings are given.
  4. present: Engineering and Life Sciences buildings locate the outage.
  5. present: Location present: listed science and engineering buildings.
  6. present: Readers are told where: a named set of halls.
  7. present: Named campus buildings are the location.
  8. present: The sites include Geology Mathematics Computer Science and Engineering.
  9. present: Place is explicit in many building names.
  10. present: Location is not generic campus; it is a building list.
  11. present: The bulletin locates the outage at listed buildings.
  12. present: Building names satisfy location.
  13. present: Lot 16 is a geographic cue, and so are the halls.
  14. present: The scene is identified as named buildings.
  15. present: Location is named facilities.
  16. present: Each listed building is a place cue.
  17. present: Place is the listed science complex.
  18. present: The first sentence names the buildings.
  19. present: Specific facilities are named.
  20. present: Location present via the building list.
  21. present: The hall names are enough for location.
  22. present: Engineering and Chemical Sciences appear in the first sentence.
  23. present: Named structures are the location element.
  24. present: The place words are a list of building names.
  25. present: Location is satisfied by the building list.
• Guidanceabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  The first product is a no-risk status report with no protective instruction.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: there is no risk to the community is status, not a protective action.
  2. absent: The notice does not tell people to evacuate, shelter, or avoid.
  3. absent: No instruction such as stay away appears.
  4. absent: Guidance is absent from the first product.
  5. absent: Recipients are not told what to do.
  6. absent: No protective action is given.
  7. absent: The product does not order a shelter or evacuation.
  8. absent: I find no do-this instruction.
  9. absent: Avoid, shelter, and leave are all missing.
  10. absent: Guidance fails because no action is directed at the audience.
  11. absent: The alert describes the outage without telling people how to act.
  12. absent: no risk to the community is information, not guidance.
  13. absent: Guidance is not satisfied by a status report.
  14. absent: Crews on site is responder action, not guidance.
  15. absent: The notice does not say stay out or reenter.
  16. absent: I code guidance absent.
  17. absent: There is no required action language.
  18. absent: The audience is not instructed.
  19. absent: No protective verb is aimed at the reader.
  20. absent: Status-only wording is not guidance.
  21. absent: The first alert is descriptive, not directive.
  22. absent: No call to action is present.
  23. absent: Guidance missing from the first product.
  24. absent: The text does not tell people to take a protective step.
  25. absent: I do not treat no risk as an instruction.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  already on site is treated as a recency cue.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: already on site marks the response as now.
  2. present: already is a recency cue.
  3. present: A time cue is already on site.
  4. present: Time present via already.
  5. present: The word already is a when marker.
  6. present: Recency is already on site.
  7. present: Time is the already clause.
  8. present: The bulletin says crews are already on site.
  9. present: already is a time element.
  10. present: The when is now, via already.
  11. present: A present-tense already is the time mark.
  12. present: Clock is in the archive stamp, not the body; already remains.
  13. present: Time is the already phrase.
  14. present: The narrative includes already as recency.
  15. present: already on site is time.
  16. present: The when is a present-tense repair.
  17. present: A recency adverb is the time element.
  18. present: Time satisfied by already.
  19. present: The repair is described as already underway.
  20. present: already is explicit recency.
  21. present: The bulletin timestamps the response as already happening.
  22. present: No clock in the body, but already is enough for time.
  23. present: The already clause is a time mark.
  24. present: Time is not missing if already counts.
  25. present: already on site is a clear now cue.
• Impactabsent5/25

  Final assessment

  Most passes find no stated harm; the text says no risk to the community.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: The text says there is no risk to the community.
  2. absent: No injury language is used.
  3. absent: Impact as harm is denied.
  4. absent: No deadly wording appears.
  5. absent: An isolated leak is presented as contained.
  6. absent: I do not infer injury the notice denies.
  7. absent: No one is described as hurt.
  8. absent: Impact fails because the product says no risk.
  9. absent: Severity of harm is denied.
  10. absent: The bulletin is a no-risk status, not an impact statement.
  11. absent: Nothing says people are in danger.
  12. absent: Impact is not satisfied when the text says no risk.
  13. absent: No injury count is given.
  14. absent: I code impact absent.
  15. absent: The text stops at no risk to the community.
  16. absent: No life-threatening language is present as a claim.
  17. absent: Service loss is a utility state, not impact under the rubric.
  18. absent: The alert does not say the situation is dangerous.
  19. absent: no risk is the opposite of impact.
  20. absent: A no-risk isolated-leak notice is not impact under the rubric.
  21. present: Lost domestic water and lab gas is a stated functional impact.
  22. present: I read a multi-building outage as impact.
  23. present: Impacting the following buildings is impact language.
  24. present: The outage will impact services is a stated consequence.
  25. present: A gas leak, even isolated, is a stated event with implied harm potential.