Northeast-side outage already restored at posting

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes treat the university, SDSU, and Facilities Services as source.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: The notice names SDSU as the site and Facilities Services as the assessing unit.
  2. present: University is the speaker and SDSU is the named campus.
  3. present: Facilities Services team members are identified as the on-site responders.
  4. present: The sender is the university speaking about SDSU and Imperial Valley.
  5. present: SDSU appears as the branded campus name in the opening clause.
  6. present: The product is an official university notice about SDSU conditions.
  7. present: Facilities Services is the named campus unit assessing impacts.
  8. present: The text speaks as the university and names SDSU twice.
  9. present: Imperial Valley locations in Brawley and Calexico are SDSU sites named by the sender.
  10. present: The branded SDSU Alert archive body names SDSU as the affected campus.
  11. present: A university voice plus Facilities Services identifies the source.
  12. present: SDSU is the institution named as both site and non-impacted Imperial Valley.
  13. present: The opening The university is aware frames an official SDSU sender.
  14. present: Faculty and staff guidance is issued by the university about SDSU.
  15. present: The notice is an SDSU Urgent product naming SDSU and Facilities Services.
  16. present: Campus identity is SDSU, spoken in the university first person.
  17. present: The sender distinguishes SDSU from SDSU Imperial Valley.
  18. present: Facilities Services is the campus shop named as on site.
  19. present: The branded campus SDSU is the subject of the university notice.
  20. present: Official university wording names SDSU and its Imperial Valley locations.
  21. present: The product is SDSU Urgent copy with Facilities Services as the unit.
  22. present: University plus SDSU plus Facilities Services establish the sender.
  23. present: The archive page is an SDSU Alert body naming the campus.
  24. present: SDSU is the named institution; the university is the speaker.
  25. present: On-site Facilities Services plus SDSU branding mark the official source.
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Every pass marks the unplanned power outage as the hazard.

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: It names an unplanned power outage, a specific utility hazard.
  2. present: The hazard is an unplanned power outage at SDSU.
  3. present: Power outage is the named emergency condition.
  4. present: Unplanned power outage is the concrete hazard.
  5. present: The product reports a power outage already restored.
  6. present: Utility loss of power is the hazard described.
  7. present: An unplanned outage is the event being announced.
  8. present: The text names a power outage impacting buildings.
  9. present: Hazard language is unplanned power outage.
  10. present: The notice is about a campus power outage.
  11. present: Power has now been restored still names the outage hazard.
  12. present: The incident type in the text is a power outage.
  13. present: Unplanned plus power outage is a specific utility event.
  14. present: Buildings losing power is the hazard.
  15. present: The body reports an outage just after 2 p.m.
  16. present: A campus-wide utility interruption is the hazard.
  17. present: The named threat is loss of electrical power.
  18. present: Outage is the hazard word used throughout.
  19. present: The product is an outage notice, not a crime or weather warning.
  20. present: Unplanned power outage is explicit hazard language.
  21. present: The event is electrical service interruption.
  22. present: Power outage at SDSU is the hazard stated.
  23. present: The text concerns an unplanned electrical outage.
  24. present: Hazard is utility power loss on the northeast side.
  25. present: The body centers on an unplanned campus power outage.
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Northeast side of campus is the location; Imperial Valley is excluded.

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Northeast side of campus is a location phrase; Brawley and Calexico are named as not impacted.
  2. present: Buildings on the northeast side of campus are the affected place.
  3. present: The outage is located at SDSU, not Imperial Valley.
  4. present: Northeast side of campus is the spatial cue.
  5. present: SDSU is the site; Imperial Valley locations are excluded.
  6. present: Brawley and Calexico are named places that are not affected.
  7. present: The location is the San Diego campus northeast side.
  8. present: Buildings on the northeast side is a campus place.
  9. present: The text locates the outage at SDSU versus Imperial Valley.
  10. present: Northeast side plus SDSU plus Brawley and Calexico are place names.
  11. present: Campus buildings on the northeast side are the locus.
  12. present: The product names SDSU as the outage site.
  13. present: Imperial Valley locations in Brawley and Calexico are explicit places.
  14. present: Northeast side of campus is more specific than the whole university.
  15. present: The affected area is northeast-campus buildings.
  16. present: Location language includes SDSU and two Imperial Valley cities.
  17. present: The outage is at SDSU is a location clause.
  18. present: Northeast side is the campus sector named.
  19. present: Named places: SDSU, northeast side, Brawley, Calexico.
  20. present: The spatial frame is San Diego campus buildings, not IV.
  21. present: Buildings on the northeast side is the affected footprint.
  22. present: SDSU versus Imperial Valley is a location distinction.
  23. present: The text places the event on the northeast side of campus.
  24. present: Campus buildings are the location of the outage.
  25. present: Northeast-side SDSU buildings are the named site.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Report any ongoing issues to AssetWorks is treated as guidance.

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Faculty and staff are encouraged to report any ongoing issues is guidance.
  2. present: Report ongoing issues to the AssetWorks URL is an action request.
  3. present: The notice tells faculty and staff to report lingering problems.
  4. present: Encouraged to report any ongoing issues is explicit guidance.
  5. present: The AssetWorks cloud link is the reporting channel given.
  6. present: Guidance is to report issues online after restore.
  7. present: Faculty and staff receive a report-issues instruction.
  8. present: The product directs people to sdsu.assetworks.cloud.
  9. present: Report any ongoing issues is the protective action.
  10. present: The URL is offered as the way to report problems.
  11. present: Encouraged to report is a recommended action.
  12. present: Staff and faculty are told how to flag remaining impacts.
  13. present: The guidance is a reporting request, not shelter or evacuate.
  14. present: AssetWorks is the named reporting destination.
  15. present: Ongoing issues should be reported, per the notice.
  16. present: The body includes a report-issues instruction with a URL.
  17. present: Faculty and staff are the audience of the guidance.
  18. present: The recommended action is to report lingering outage effects.
  19. present: A reporting URL is the guidance payload.
  20. present: Encouraged to report any ongoing issues to a campus portal.
  21. present: The instruction is report issues, not stay away.
  22. present: Guidance exists as a report-any-issues line.
  23. present: The notice asks for reports of remaining building impacts.
  24. present: People are directed to a Facilities reporting form.
  25. present: Report ongoing issues is the only action asked.
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Just after 2 p.m. on July 25 is a clear time element.

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Just after 2 p.m. on July 25 is a time cue.
  2. present: July 25 plus just after 2 p.m. timestamps the outage.
  3. present: The archive stamp 2:38 p.m. matches a timed product; the body says just after 2 p.m.
  4. present: On July 25 is an explicit date in the text.
  5. present: Just after 2 p.m. is a clock time.
  6. present: The outage time is just after 2 p.m. on July 25.
  7. present: July 25 is named in the sentence.
  8. present: A 2 p.m. time of day is present.
  9. present: The body dates the report to July 25.
  10. present: Just after 2 p.m. is a temporal phrase.
  11. present: The notice includes both a date and a time of day.
  12. present: July 25 anchors the incident day.
  13. present: 2 p.m. is the reported start window.
  14. present: The text says just after 2 p.m. on July 25.
  15. present: A calendar date and a clock time both appear.
  16. present: The outage is timed to just after 2 p.m.
  17. present: July 25 is the incident date in the product.
  18. present: Time language is just after 2 p.m. on July 25.
  19. present: The sentence includes on July 25 as a date stamp.
  20. present: 2 p.m. is a specific hour mentioned.
  21. present: The event time is afternoon on July 25.
  22. present: Just after 2 p.m. marks when the outage was reported.
  23. present: The product names July 25 as the day.
  24. present: A timed outage just after 2 p.m. is stated.
  25. present: Date July 25 and time just after 2 p.m. are both present.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  All 25 passes find no stated harm to people.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No injury language is used.
  2. absent: The text does not name hurt people or deaths.
  3. absent: No victim, injury, or medical wording appears.
  4. absent: Impact is on buildings and power, not named persons harmed.
  5. absent: There is no statement of human injury.
  6. absent: No casualties are described.
  7. absent: The notice is silent on injuries.
  8. absent: People are addressed as faculty and staff, not as victims.
  9. absent: No identity of a harmed person is given.
  10. absent: Harm-to-people language is absent.
  11. absent: The restore notice does not mention injuries.
  12. absent: No patient, fatality, or wounded wording.
  13. absent: Impact on buildings is not personal harm.
  14. absent: The text has no injury or death claim.
  15. absent: No named victim appears.
  16. absent: Human harm is not asserted.
  17. absent: The product omits injury information.
  18. absent: No medical or casualty language.
  19. absent: Identity or impact on a person as harmed is missing.
  20. absent: The notice does not describe injuries.
  21. absent: No one is named as hurt.
  22. absent: There is no impact-on-people injury line.
  23. absent: Building impacts are possible; no person is named hurt.
  24. absent: The text lacks injury or fatality content.
  25. absent: No personal-harm identity element is present.