Power outage closes campus two days

To check this alert, SuperGrok Heavy 4.5 (an AI) read it in full 25 separate times, independently. Each read decided whether the message answers each of the six questions and gave a short reason. A final reviewer then weighed all 25 and wrote the plain-English verdict you see when you open a row. The score (for example 22/25) is how many reads agreed; the 25 individual reads are tucked underneath if you want to check them.

• Sourcepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Institutional branding appears via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…", which marks the sender.

  Who is sending the alert and who is responding. People act faster on a message from a clearly identifiable, credible sender, such as a named department, the police, or a branded alert system, than on an anonymous notice. A branded signature counts.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Institutional branding appears via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…", which marks the sender.
  2. present: The notice identifies who is speaking through "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  3. present: Source is present because "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" names the issuing campus or alert brand.
  4. present: A campus or alert signature ("Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…") supplies the authority line.
  5. present: Sender identity is clear from the wording "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  6. present: The alert tags an official issuer with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  7. present: Who is sending this is stated through "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  8. present: Branded language "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" functions as the source element.
  9. present: Campus naming in "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" tells recipients the origin of the message.
  10. present: An official voice is established by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  11. present: The opening or body includes "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" as institutional source.
  12. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is enough to code source present under the branding rule.
  13. present: Recipients can tell the sender from "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  14. present: Source scores present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is an authority marker.
  15. present: The university or college is referenced as "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  16. present: Alert-system or school labeling ("Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…") covers source.
  17. present: Issuing body is identifiable from "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  18. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" operates as a branded signature for source.
  19. present: The text attributes the message via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  20. present: Source present: campus authority language "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  21. present: Readers see "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" and know which campus is speaking.
  22. present: Official sender cue "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is explicit in the text.
  23. present: Source is coded yes based on "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  24. present: The phrase "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" identifies the responding institution.
  25. present: Authority is named through the fragment "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
• Hazardpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Hazard is specific: the text names "power outage".

  What the threat actually is. A complete warning names the specific danger, such as a shooter, a fire, a tornado, or a gas leak, rather than a vague emergency, because people decide what to do based on what they are facing.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Hazard is specific: the text names "power outage".
  2. present: A concrete threat appears as "power outage".
  3. present: The what of the emergency is "power outage", not a vague incident label.
  4. present: "power outage" satisfies hazard by naming the condition or threat.
  5. present: Readers learn the hazard type from "power outage".
  6. present: Hazard present via the explicit phrase "power outage".
  7. present: The threat is particularized as "power outage".
  8. present: Coding H=1 because "power outage" is a named hazard.
  9. present: Specific danger language: "power outage".
  10. present: The alert states the problem as "power outage".
  11. present: Hazard element met by "power outage".
  12. present: "power outage" is more than a generic emergency word.
  13. present: Threat identity is clear from "power outage".
  14. present: The message pins the hazard to "power outage".
  15. present: Named condition "power outage" counts as hazard.
  16. present: H is present: "power outage" tells what is wrong.
  17. present: Concrete hazard wording includes "power outage".
  18. present: The incident type is given as "power outage".
  19. present: "power outage" is the stated threat or weather/system hazard.
  20. present: Hazard codes yes on "power outage".
  21. present: Specifics beat generics here: "power outage".
  22. present: The text's hazard signal is "power outage".
  23. present: What happened is labeled "power outage".
  24. present: Hazard present with the phrase "power outage".
  25. present: Threat naming succeeds through "power outage".
• Locationpresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Location is given through "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".

  Where the threat is. Saying whether danger is in a specific building, a part of campus, or area-wide lets people judge their own proximity and choose a safe direction. Without a where, a warning is hard to act on precisely.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Location is given through "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  2. present: Place is specified as "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  3. present: Where is answered by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  4. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" functions as the location element.
  5. present: The alert situates the event with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  6. present: Geographic or campus place: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  7. present: L=1 because "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" names where this applies.
  8. present: Recipients are told the place via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  9. present: Location present in the phrase "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  10. present: A campus or building reference "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" covers location.
  11. present: The where cue is "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  12. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" identifies the affected area.
  13. present: Place naming succeeds with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  14. present: Location codes yes on "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  15. present: Site detail appears as "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  16. present: The message anchors place with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  17. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is enough location under the rubric.
  18. present: Affected place language: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  19. present: L is present via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  20. present: Campus geography is marked by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  21. present: Where this matters is "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  22. present: The text localizes to "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  23. present: Location element met by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  24. present: Place is not left blank: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  25. present: Spatial reference "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" supports L=1.
• Guidancepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Guidance is the instruction "CLOSED".

  The protective action to take. A clear, specific instruction, such as shelter in place, evacuate, avoid the area, or run-hide-fight, drives faster and more correct protective behavior than describing the threat alone.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Guidance is the instruction "CLOSED".
  2. present: Protective action appears as "CLOSED".
  3. present: Recipients are told to act via "CLOSED".
  4. present: "CLOSED" is a direct what-to-do line.
  5. present: G=1 because "CLOSED" instructs the audience.
  6. present: The alert directs action with "CLOSED".
  7. present: Guidance present: "CLOSED".
  8. present: A clear instruction is "CLOSED".
  9. present: What to do is stated as "CLOSED".
  10. present: "CLOSED" counts as protective guidance.
  11. present: Action language "CLOSED" meets guidance.
  12. present: The message tells people "CLOSED".
  13. present: Guidance codes yes on "CLOSED".
  14. present: Operational direction: "CLOSED".
  15. present: Instructional content includes "CLOSED".
  16. present: "CLOSED" is audience-facing guidance.
  17. present: G is present via the cue "CLOSED".
  18. present: Protective or operational order "CLOSED" is explicit.
  19. present: The text's guidance signal is "CLOSED".
  20. present: Recipients receive the directive "CLOSED".
  21. present: What-to-do element satisfied by "CLOSED".
  22. present: "CLOSED" tells the public how to respond or operate.
  23. present: Guidance met through "CLOSED".
  24. present: Action instruction present: "CLOSED".
  25. present: The alert's order to the audience is "CLOSED".
• Timepresent25/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 present. Time is marked by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".

  When the message applies. A timestamp, the word now or immediately, or a phrase like until further notice tells the reader whether the danger is current and how quickly to act.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. present: Time is marked by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  2. present: A temporal cue appears as "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  3. present: When is answered with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  4. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" supplies timing or recency.
  5. present: T=1 because "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is a time reference.
  6. present: Clock or calendar language: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  7. present: The alert times the event with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  8. present: Temporal detail "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is present.
  9. present: Time element met by "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  10. present: Recipients see timing via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  11. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" counts as the time cue.
  12. present: When-language includes "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  13. present: T codes yes on "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  14. present: A schedule or day marker "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" appears.
  15. present: Timing is explicit: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  16. present: The text anchors time with "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  17. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is enough for the time element.
  18. present: Recency or clock cue "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" is stated.
  19. present: T is present via "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  20. present: Date or hour language "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" supports T=1.
  21. present: Temporal reference: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  22. present: The when signal is "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  23. present: Time present through "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…".
  24. present: "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" tells recipients the relevant when.
  25. present: Schedule wording "Our campus is CLOSED due to a power out…" meets time.
• Impactabsent0/25

  Final assessment

  Majority 25/25 absent. No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.

  What the hazard could do to the people in its path. Beyond naming the threat, a complete warning conveys its potential consequences or severity, such as that a tornado can level buildings or that a leak could be explosive, so recipients grasp how much danger they are in. Research on warning message content finds that a concrete impact statement helps people personalize their risk and act sooner.

  See all 25 individual reads

  1. absent: No consequence or severity language appears beyond naming a hazard.
  2. absent: Impact is absent: the text does not say what the threat could do.
  3. absent: Nothing states danger level, injuries, or disruptive effect.
  4. absent: I=0 because severity or harm is not conveyed.
  5. absent: Hazard may be named, but impact language is missing.
  6. absent: The alert omits consequence wording.
  7. absent: Impact fails the harm-or-severity test.
  8. absent: Readers are not told stakes or effects.
  9. absent: No life-safety or operational impact phrase is present.
  10. absent: Impact element codes absent.
  11. absent: Without consequence language, I is zero.
  12. absent: Severity is left unstated.
  13. absent: The text stops short of impact.
  14. absent: Harm potential is not described.
  15. absent: I fails on bare description without effects.
  16. absent: No dangerous/closed/injury-style impact cue appears.
  17. absent: Impact not established by the wording.
  18. absent: Consequence detail is missing.
  19. absent: The message lacks severity framing.
  20. absent: I is absent under the impact rule.
  21. absent: Stakes for people or property are not stated.
  22. absent: No disruption or harm language is included.
  23. absent: Impact cannot be coded present here.
  24. absent: Effect-on-campus language is omitted.
  25. absent: Severity/consequence element fails.